Cargando…

Visual tools to assess the plausibility of algorithm-identified infectious disease clusters: an application to mumps data from the Netherlands dating from January 2009 to June 2016

INTRODUCTION: With growing amounts of data available, identification of clusters of persons linked to each other by transmission of an infectious disease increasingly relies on automated algorithms. We propose cluster finding to be a two-step process: first, possible transmission clusters are identi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soetens, Loes, Backer, Jantien A., Hahné, Susan, van Binnendijk, Rob, Gouma, Sigrid, Wallinga, Jacco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30914076
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.12.1800331
_version_ 1783407413379989504
author Soetens, Loes
Backer, Jantien A.
Hahné, Susan
van Binnendijk, Rob
Gouma, Sigrid
Wallinga, Jacco
author_facet Soetens, Loes
Backer, Jantien A.
Hahné, Susan
van Binnendijk, Rob
Gouma, Sigrid
Wallinga, Jacco
author_sort Soetens, Loes
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: With growing amounts of data available, identification of clusters of persons linked to each other by transmission of an infectious disease increasingly relies on automated algorithms. We propose cluster finding to be a two-step process: first, possible transmission clusters are identified using a cluster algorithm, second, the plausibility that the identified clusters represent genuine transmission clusters is evaluated. AIM: To introduce visual tools to assess automatically identified clusters. METHODS: We developed tools to visualise: (i) clusters found in dimensions of time, geographical location and genetic data; (ii) nested sub-clusters within identified clusters; (iii) intra-cluster pairwise dissimilarities per dimension; (iv) intra-cluster correlation between dimensions. We applied our tools to notified mumps cases in the Netherlands with available disease onset date (January 2009 – June 2016), geographical information (location of residence), and pathogen sequence data (n = 112). We compared identified clusters to clusters reported by the Netherlands Early Warning Committee (NEWC). RESULTS: We identified five mumps clusters. Three clusters were considered plausible. One was questionable because, in phylogenetic analysis, genetic sequences related to it segregated in two groups. One was implausible with no smaller nested clusters, high intra-cluster dissimilarities on all dimensions, and low intra-cluster correlation between dimensions. The NEWC reports concurred with our findings: the plausible/questionable clusters corresponded to reported outbreaks; the implausible cluster did not. CONCLUSION: Our tools for assessing automatically identified clusters allow outbreak investigators to rapidly spot plausible transmission clusters for mumps and other human-to-human transmissible diseases. This fast information processing potentially reduces workload.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6440581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64405812019-08-08 Visual tools to assess the plausibility of algorithm-identified infectious disease clusters: an application to mumps data from the Netherlands dating from January 2009 to June 2016 Soetens, Loes Backer, Jantien A. Hahné, Susan van Binnendijk, Rob Gouma, Sigrid Wallinga, Jacco Euro Surveill Research INTRODUCTION: With growing amounts of data available, identification of clusters of persons linked to each other by transmission of an infectious disease increasingly relies on automated algorithms. We propose cluster finding to be a two-step process: first, possible transmission clusters are identified using a cluster algorithm, second, the plausibility that the identified clusters represent genuine transmission clusters is evaluated. AIM: To introduce visual tools to assess automatically identified clusters. METHODS: We developed tools to visualise: (i) clusters found in dimensions of time, geographical location and genetic data; (ii) nested sub-clusters within identified clusters; (iii) intra-cluster pairwise dissimilarities per dimension; (iv) intra-cluster correlation between dimensions. We applied our tools to notified mumps cases in the Netherlands with available disease onset date (January 2009 – June 2016), geographical information (location of residence), and pathogen sequence data (n = 112). We compared identified clusters to clusters reported by the Netherlands Early Warning Committee (NEWC). RESULTS: We identified five mumps clusters. Three clusters were considered plausible. One was questionable because, in phylogenetic analysis, genetic sequences related to it segregated in two groups. One was implausible with no smaller nested clusters, high intra-cluster dissimilarities on all dimensions, and low intra-cluster correlation between dimensions. The NEWC reports concurred with our findings: the plausible/questionable clusters corresponded to reported outbreaks; the implausible cluster did not. CONCLUSION: Our tools for assessing automatically identified clusters allow outbreak investigators to rapidly spot plausible transmission clusters for mumps and other human-to-human transmissible diseases. This fast information processing potentially reduces workload. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2019-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6440581/ /pubmed/30914076 http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.12.1800331 Text en This article is copyright of the authors or their affiliated institutions, 2019. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) Licence. You may share and adapt the material, but must give appropriate credit to the source, provide a link to the licence, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Soetens, Loes
Backer, Jantien A.
Hahné, Susan
van Binnendijk, Rob
Gouma, Sigrid
Wallinga, Jacco
Visual tools to assess the plausibility of algorithm-identified infectious disease clusters: an application to mumps data from the Netherlands dating from January 2009 to June 2016
title Visual tools to assess the plausibility of algorithm-identified infectious disease clusters: an application to mumps data from the Netherlands dating from January 2009 to June 2016
title_full Visual tools to assess the plausibility of algorithm-identified infectious disease clusters: an application to mumps data from the Netherlands dating from January 2009 to June 2016
title_fullStr Visual tools to assess the plausibility of algorithm-identified infectious disease clusters: an application to mumps data from the Netherlands dating from January 2009 to June 2016
title_full_unstemmed Visual tools to assess the plausibility of algorithm-identified infectious disease clusters: an application to mumps data from the Netherlands dating from January 2009 to June 2016
title_short Visual tools to assess the plausibility of algorithm-identified infectious disease clusters: an application to mumps data from the Netherlands dating from January 2009 to June 2016
title_sort visual tools to assess the plausibility of algorithm-identified infectious disease clusters: an application to mumps data from the netherlands dating from january 2009 to june 2016
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30914076
http://dx.doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.12.1800331
work_keys_str_mv AT soetensloes visualtoolstoassesstheplausibilityofalgorithmidentifiedinfectiousdiseaseclustersanapplicationtomumpsdatafromthenetherlandsdatingfromjanuary2009tojune2016
AT backerjantiena visualtoolstoassesstheplausibilityofalgorithmidentifiedinfectiousdiseaseclustersanapplicationtomumpsdatafromthenetherlandsdatingfromjanuary2009tojune2016
AT hahnesusan visualtoolstoassesstheplausibilityofalgorithmidentifiedinfectiousdiseaseclustersanapplicationtomumpsdatafromthenetherlandsdatingfromjanuary2009tojune2016
AT vanbinnendijkrob visualtoolstoassesstheplausibilityofalgorithmidentifiedinfectiousdiseaseclustersanapplicationtomumpsdatafromthenetherlandsdatingfromjanuary2009tojune2016
AT goumasigrid visualtoolstoassesstheplausibilityofalgorithmidentifiedinfectiousdiseaseclustersanapplicationtomumpsdatafromthenetherlandsdatingfromjanuary2009tojune2016
AT wallingajacco visualtoolstoassesstheplausibilityofalgorithmidentifiedinfectiousdiseaseclustersanapplicationtomumpsdatafromthenetherlandsdatingfromjanuary2009tojune2016