Cargando…
A provider feedback intervention to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in a Swiss academic general practice
Colorectal cancer (CRC) cancer screening uptake is low in our diverse, outpatient teaching clinic. A state-level public screening programme was recently launched that provides faecal immunochemical tests or screening colonoscopy to all citizens aged 50–69 years via mailed invitations, with the possi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30997416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000452 |
_version_ | 1783407414791372800 |
---|---|
author | Mota, Pau Auer, Reto Gouveia, Alexandre Selby, Kevin |
author_facet | Mota, Pau Auer, Reto Gouveia, Alexandre Selby, Kevin |
author_sort | Mota, Pau |
collection | PubMed |
description | Colorectal cancer (CRC) cancer screening uptake is low in our diverse, outpatient teaching clinic. A state-level public screening programme was recently launched that provides faecal immunochemical tests or screening colonoscopy to all citizens aged 50–69 years via mailed invitations, with the possibility of earlier, opportunistic inclusion. Mailed outreach is expected to be rolled out over the next 5 years. In the interim, we aimed to increase CRC screening by accelerating the inclusion of patients into the programme by implementing a provider feedback programme with residents. We used billing reports to define the eligible target population and monthly lists of included patients to track progress. All residents received a standard intervention that provided basic training and communication tools facilitating shared decision making in CRC screening decisions. We then developed and implemented the intervention over 3 Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles in 2 of 4 groups of residents, each with 7 residents and approximately 250 eligible patients. The intervention consisted of individualised reports on the proportion of each resident’s patients that had been included in the screening programme and the names of patients who had not yet been included. The first group that received the intervention had included 58 of 232 eligible patients (25%) at 8 months after the feedback intervention and the second group 51 of 249 eligible patients (20%) at 4 months. In comparison, the 2 groups with only the standard intervention had included 32 of 252 (13%) and 27 of 260 (10%) of their patients, respectively, at 11 months after the baseline intervention. These results suggest that provider feedback to medical residents can promote resident self-awareness and increase the proportion of patients included in a public programme when provided in addition to educational interventions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6440588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64405882019-04-17 A provider feedback intervention to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in a Swiss academic general practice Mota, Pau Auer, Reto Gouveia, Alexandre Selby, Kevin BMJ Open Qual BMJ Quality Improvement report Colorectal cancer (CRC) cancer screening uptake is low in our diverse, outpatient teaching clinic. A state-level public screening programme was recently launched that provides faecal immunochemical tests or screening colonoscopy to all citizens aged 50–69 years via mailed invitations, with the possibility of earlier, opportunistic inclusion. Mailed outreach is expected to be rolled out over the next 5 years. In the interim, we aimed to increase CRC screening by accelerating the inclusion of patients into the programme by implementing a provider feedback programme with residents. We used billing reports to define the eligible target population and monthly lists of included patients to track progress. All residents received a standard intervention that provided basic training and communication tools facilitating shared decision making in CRC screening decisions. We then developed and implemented the intervention over 3 Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles in 2 of 4 groups of residents, each with 7 residents and approximately 250 eligible patients. The intervention consisted of individualised reports on the proportion of each resident’s patients that had been included in the screening programme and the names of patients who had not yet been included. The first group that received the intervention had included 58 of 232 eligible patients (25%) at 8 months after the feedback intervention and the second group 51 of 249 eligible patients (20%) at 4 months. In comparison, the 2 groups with only the standard intervention had included 32 of 252 (13%) and 27 of 260 (10%) of their patients, respectively, at 11 months after the baseline intervention. These results suggest that provider feedback to medical residents can promote resident self-awareness and increase the proportion of patients included in a public programme when provided in addition to educational interventions. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6440588/ /pubmed/30997416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000452 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | BMJ Quality Improvement report Mota, Pau Auer, Reto Gouveia, Alexandre Selby, Kevin A provider feedback intervention to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in a Swiss academic general practice |
title | A provider feedback intervention to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in a Swiss academic general practice |
title_full | A provider feedback intervention to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in a Swiss academic general practice |
title_fullStr | A provider feedback intervention to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in a Swiss academic general practice |
title_full_unstemmed | A provider feedback intervention to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in a Swiss academic general practice |
title_short | A provider feedback intervention to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in a Swiss academic general practice |
title_sort | provider feedback intervention to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in a swiss academic general practice |
topic | BMJ Quality Improvement report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30997416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000452 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT motapau aproviderfeedbackinterventiontoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeninginaswissacademicgeneralpractice AT auerreto aproviderfeedbackinterventiontoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeninginaswissacademicgeneralpractice AT gouveiaalexandre aproviderfeedbackinterventiontoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeninginaswissacademicgeneralpractice AT selbykevin aproviderfeedbackinterventiontoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeninginaswissacademicgeneralpractice AT motapau providerfeedbackinterventiontoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeninginaswissacademicgeneralpractice AT auerreto providerfeedbackinterventiontoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeninginaswissacademicgeneralpractice AT gouveiaalexandre providerfeedbackinterventiontoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeninginaswissacademicgeneralpractice AT selbykevin providerfeedbackinterventiontoincreaseuptakeofcolorectalcancerscreeninginaswissacademicgeneralpractice |