Cargando…
Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion
Innovation in agriculture is pervasive. However, in spite of the success stories of twentieth century plant breeding, the twenty-first century has ushered in a set of challenges that solutions from the past century are unlikely to address. However, sustained research and the amalgamation of a number...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30830581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5 |
_version_ | 1783407452114386944 |
---|---|
author | Lassoued, Rim Macall, Diego Maximiliano Hesseln, Hayley Phillips, Peter W. B. Smyth, Stuart J. |
author_facet | Lassoued, Rim Macall, Diego Maximiliano Hesseln, Hayley Phillips, Peter W. B. Smyth, Stuart J. |
author_sort | Lassoued, Rim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Innovation in agriculture is pervasive. However, in spite of the success stories of twentieth century plant breeding, the twenty-first century has ushered in a set of challenges that solutions from the past century are unlikely to address. However, sustained research and the amalgamation of a number of disciplines has resulted in new breeding techniques (NBTs), such as genome editing, which offer the promise of new opportunities to resolve some of the issues. Here we present the results of an expert survey on the added potential benefits of genome-edited crops compared to those developed through genetic modification (GM) and conventional breeding. Overall, survey results reveal a consensus among experts on the enhanced agronomic performance and product quality of genome-edited crops over alternatives. The majority of experts indicated that the regulations for health and safety, followed by export markets, consumers, and the media play a major role in determining where and how NBTs, including genome editing, will be developed and used in agriculture. Further research is needed to gauge expert opinion after the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling establishing that site-specific mutagenic breeding technologies are to be regulated in the same fashion as GM crops, regardless of whether foreign DNA is present in the final variety. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6440930 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64409302019-04-15 Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion Lassoued, Rim Macall, Diego Maximiliano Hesseln, Hayley Phillips, Peter W. B. Smyth, Stuart J. Transgenic Res Original Paper Innovation in agriculture is pervasive. However, in spite of the success stories of twentieth century plant breeding, the twenty-first century has ushered in a set of challenges that solutions from the past century are unlikely to address. However, sustained research and the amalgamation of a number of disciplines has resulted in new breeding techniques (NBTs), such as genome editing, which offer the promise of new opportunities to resolve some of the issues. Here we present the results of an expert survey on the added potential benefits of genome-edited crops compared to those developed through genetic modification (GM) and conventional breeding. Overall, survey results reveal a consensus among experts on the enhanced agronomic performance and product quality of genome-edited crops over alternatives. The majority of experts indicated that the regulations for health and safety, followed by export markets, consumers, and the media play a major role in determining where and how NBTs, including genome editing, will be developed and used in agriculture. Further research is needed to gauge expert opinion after the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling establishing that site-specific mutagenic breeding technologies are to be regulated in the same fashion as GM crops, regardless of whether foreign DNA is present in the final variety. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-04 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6440930/ /pubmed/30830581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lassoued, Rim Macall, Diego Maximiliano Hesseln, Hayley Phillips, Peter W. B. Smyth, Stuart J. Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion |
title | Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion |
title_full | Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion |
title_fullStr | Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion |
title_short | Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion |
title_sort | benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440930/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30830581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lassouedrim benefitsofgenomeeditedcropsexpertopinion AT macalldiegomaximiliano benefitsofgenomeeditedcropsexpertopinion AT hesselnhayley benefitsofgenomeeditedcropsexpertopinion AT phillipspeterwb benefitsofgenomeeditedcropsexpertopinion AT smythstuartj benefitsofgenomeeditedcropsexpertopinion |