Cargando…

Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion

Innovation in agriculture is pervasive. However, in spite of the success stories of twentieth century plant breeding, the twenty-first century has ushered in a set of challenges that solutions from the past century are unlikely to address. However, sustained research and the amalgamation of a number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lassoued, Rim, Macall, Diego Maximiliano, Hesseln, Hayley, Phillips, Peter W. B., Smyth, Stuart J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30830581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5
_version_ 1783407452114386944
author Lassoued, Rim
Macall, Diego Maximiliano
Hesseln, Hayley
Phillips, Peter W. B.
Smyth, Stuart J.
author_facet Lassoued, Rim
Macall, Diego Maximiliano
Hesseln, Hayley
Phillips, Peter W. B.
Smyth, Stuart J.
author_sort Lassoued, Rim
collection PubMed
description Innovation in agriculture is pervasive. However, in spite of the success stories of twentieth century plant breeding, the twenty-first century has ushered in a set of challenges that solutions from the past century are unlikely to address. However, sustained research and the amalgamation of a number of disciplines has resulted in new breeding techniques (NBTs), such as genome editing, which offer the promise of new opportunities to resolve some of the issues. Here we present the results of an expert survey on the added potential benefits of genome-edited crops compared to those developed through genetic modification (GM) and conventional breeding. Overall, survey results reveal a consensus among experts on the enhanced agronomic performance and product quality of genome-edited crops over alternatives. The majority of experts indicated that the regulations for health and safety, followed by export markets, consumers, and the media play a major role in determining where and how NBTs, including genome editing, will be developed and used in agriculture. Further research is needed to gauge expert opinion after the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling establishing that site-specific mutagenic breeding technologies are to be regulated in the same fashion as GM crops, regardless of whether foreign DNA is present in the final variety. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6440930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64409302019-04-15 Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion Lassoued, Rim Macall, Diego Maximiliano Hesseln, Hayley Phillips, Peter W. B. Smyth, Stuart J. Transgenic Res Original Paper Innovation in agriculture is pervasive. However, in spite of the success stories of twentieth century plant breeding, the twenty-first century has ushered in a set of challenges that solutions from the past century are unlikely to address. However, sustained research and the amalgamation of a number of disciplines has resulted in new breeding techniques (NBTs), such as genome editing, which offer the promise of new opportunities to resolve some of the issues. Here we present the results of an expert survey on the added potential benefits of genome-edited crops compared to those developed through genetic modification (GM) and conventional breeding. Overall, survey results reveal a consensus among experts on the enhanced agronomic performance and product quality of genome-edited crops over alternatives. The majority of experts indicated that the regulations for health and safety, followed by export markets, consumers, and the media play a major role in determining where and how NBTs, including genome editing, will be developed and used in agriculture. Further research is needed to gauge expert opinion after the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling establishing that site-specific mutagenic breeding technologies are to be regulated in the same fashion as GM crops, regardless of whether foreign DNA is present in the final variety. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-04 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6440930/ /pubmed/30830581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lassoued, Rim
Macall, Diego Maximiliano
Hesseln, Hayley
Phillips, Peter W. B.
Smyth, Stuart J.
Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion
title Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion
title_full Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion
title_fullStr Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion
title_short Benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion
title_sort benefits of genome-edited crops: expert opinion
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30830581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00118-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lassouedrim benefitsofgenomeeditedcropsexpertopinion
AT macalldiegomaximiliano benefitsofgenomeeditedcropsexpertopinion
AT hesselnhayley benefitsofgenomeeditedcropsexpertopinion
AT phillipspeterwb benefitsofgenomeeditedcropsexpertopinion
AT smythstuartj benefitsofgenomeeditedcropsexpertopinion