Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials
Pioglitazone, the only thiazolidinedione drug in clinical practice is under scrutiny due to reported adverse effects, it’s unique insulin sensitising action provides rationale to remain as a therapeutic option for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We conducted a systematic review and meta-an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30926892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41854-2 |
_version_ | 1783407474688131072 |
---|---|
author | Alam, Fahmida Islam, Md. Asiful Mohamed, Mafauzy Ahmad, Imran Kamal, Mohammad Amjad Donnelly, Richard Idris, Iskandar Gan, Siew Hua |
author_facet | Alam, Fahmida Islam, Md. Asiful Mohamed, Mafauzy Ahmad, Imran Kamal, Mohammad Amjad Donnelly, Richard Idris, Iskandar Gan, Siew Hua |
author_sort | Alam, Fahmida |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pioglitazone, the only thiazolidinedione drug in clinical practice is under scrutiny due to reported adverse effects, it’s unique insulin sensitising action provides rationale to remain as a therapeutic option for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pioglitazone monotherapy with monotherapies of other oral antidiabetic drugs for assessing its efficacy and safety in T2DM patients. Mean changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and mean changes in fasting blood sugar (FBS) level, body weight (BW) and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Safety outcomes were changes in lipid parameters, blood pressure and incidences of adverse events. Metafor package of R software and RevMan software based on random-effects model were used for analyses. We included 16 randomised controlled trials. Pioglitazone monotherapy showed equivalent efficacy as comparators in reducing HbA1c by 0.05% (95% CI: −0.21 to 0.11) and greater efficacy in reducing FBS level by 0.24 mmol/l (95% CI: −0.48 to −0.01). Pioglitazone showed similar efficacy as comparators in reducing HOMA-IR (WMD: 0.05, 95% CI: −0.49 to 0.59) and increasing high-density lipoprotein level (WMD: 0.02 mmol/l, 95% CI: −0.06 to 0.10). Improved blood pressure (WMD: −1.05 mmHg, 95% CI: −4.29 to 2.19) and triglycerides level (WMD: −0.71 mmol/l, 95% CI: −1.70 to 0.28) were also observed with pioglitazone monotherapy. There was a significant association of pioglitazone with increased BW (WMD: 2.06 kg, 95% CI: 1.11 to 3.01) and risk of oedema (RR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.48 to 3.31), though the risk of hypoglycaemia was absolutely lower (RR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.80). Meta-analysis supported pioglitazone as an effective treatment option for T2DM patients to ameliorate hyperglycaemia, adverse lipid metabolism and blood pressure. Pioglitazone is suggested to prescribe following individual patient’s needs. It can be a choice of drug for insulin resistant T2DM patients having dyslipidaemia, hypertension or history of cardiovascular disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6441028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64410282019-04-04 Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Alam, Fahmida Islam, Md. Asiful Mohamed, Mafauzy Ahmad, Imran Kamal, Mohammad Amjad Donnelly, Richard Idris, Iskandar Gan, Siew Hua Sci Rep Article Pioglitazone, the only thiazolidinedione drug in clinical practice is under scrutiny due to reported adverse effects, it’s unique insulin sensitising action provides rationale to remain as a therapeutic option for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pioglitazone monotherapy with monotherapies of other oral antidiabetic drugs for assessing its efficacy and safety in T2DM patients. Mean changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and mean changes in fasting blood sugar (FBS) level, body weight (BW) and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Safety outcomes were changes in lipid parameters, blood pressure and incidences of adverse events. Metafor package of R software and RevMan software based on random-effects model were used for analyses. We included 16 randomised controlled trials. Pioglitazone monotherapy showed equivalent efficacy as comparators in reducing HbA1c by 0.05% (95% CI: −0.21 to 0.11) and greater efficacy in reducing FBS level by 0.24 mmol/l (95% CI: −0.48 to −0.01). Pioglitazone showed similar efficacy as comparators in reducing HOMA-IR (WMD: 0.05, 95% CI: −0.49 to 0.59) and increasing high-density lipoprotein level (WMD: 0.02 mmol/l, 95% CI: −0.06 to 0.10). Improved blood pressure (WMD: −1.05 mmHg, 95% CI: −4.29 to 2.19) and triglycerides level (WMD: −0.71 mmol/l, 95% CI: −1.70 to 0.28) were also observed with pioglitazone monotherapy. There was a significant association of pioglitazone with increased BW (WMD: 2.06 kg, 95% CI: 1.11 to 3.01) and risk of oedema (RR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.48 to 3.31), though the risk of hypoglycaemia was absolutely lower (RR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.80). Meta-analysis supported pioglitazone as an effective treatment option for T2DM patients to ameliorate hyperglycaemia, adverse lipid metabolism and blood pressure. Pioglitazone is suggested to prescribe following individual patient’s needs. It can be a choice of drug for insulin resistant T2DM patients having dyslipidaemia, hypertension or history of cardiovascular disease. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6441028/ /pubmed/30926892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41854-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Alam, Fahmida Islam, Md. Asiful Mohamed, Mafauzy Ahmad, Imran Kamal, Mohammad Amjad Donnelly, Richard Idris, Iskandar Gan, Siew Hua Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of pioglitazone monotherapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30926892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41854-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alamfahmida efficacyandsafetyofpioglitazonemonotherapyintype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT islammdasiful efficacyandsafetyofpioglitazonemonotherapyintype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT mohamedmafauzy efficacyandsafetyofpioglitazonemonotherapyintype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT ahmadimran efficacyandsafetyofpioglitazonemonotherapyintype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT kamalmohammadamjad efficacyandsafetyofpioglitazonemonotherapyintype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT donnellyrichard efficacyandsafetyofpioglitazonemonotherapyintype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT idrisiskandar efficacyandsafetyofpioglitazonemonotherapyintype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT gansiewhua efficacyandsafetyofpioglitazonemonotherapyintype2diabetesmellitusasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |