Cargando…
Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications
Exosomes have received significant attention for their role in pathobiological processes and are being explored as a tool for disease diagnosis and management. Consequently, various isolation methods based on different principles have been developed for exosome isolation. Here we compared the effica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30926864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41800-2 |
_version_ | 1783407478493413376 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Girijesh Kumar Khan, Mohammad Aslam Zubair, Haseeb Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar Khushman, Moh’d Singh, Seema Singh, Ajay Pratap |
author_facet | Patel, Girijesh Kumar Khan, Mohammad Aslam Zubair, Haseeb Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar Khushman, Moh’d Singh, Seema Singh, Ajay Pratap |
author_sort | Patel, Girijesh Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Exosomes have received significant attention for their role in pathobiological processes and are being explored as a tool for disease diagnosis and management. Consequently, various isolation methods based on different principles have been developed for exosome isolation. Here we compared the efficacy of four kits from Invitrogen, 101Bio, Wako and iZON along with conventional ultracentrifugation-based method for exosome yield, purity and quality. Cell culture supernatant was used as an abundant source of exosomes, and exosome quantity, size-distribution, zeta-potential, marker-expression and RNA/protein quality were determined. The Invitrogen kit gave the highest yield but the preparation showed broader size-distribution likely due to microvesicle co-precipitation and had the least dispersion stability. Other preparations showed <150 nm size range and good stability. Preparation from iZON column; however, had a broader size-distribution in the lower size range suggestive of some impurities of non-vesicular aggregates. RNA quality from all preparations was comparable; however, proteins from Invitrogen method-based exosomal preparation showed polyethylene glycol (PEG) contamination in mass spectrometry. Chemical impurities from the precipitant could also be the cause of toxicity of Invitrogen method-based exosomal preparation in biological growth measurement assay. Together, these findings should serve as a guide to choose and further optimize exosome isolation methods for their desired downstream applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6441044 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64410442019-04-04 Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications Patel, Girijesh Kumar Khan, Mohammad Aslam Zubair, Haseeb Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar Khushman, Moh’d Singh, Seema Singh, Ajay Pratap Sci Rep Article Exosomes have received significant attention for their role in pathobiological processes and are being explored as a tool for disease diagnosis and management. Consequently, various isolation methods based on different principles have been developed for exosome isolation. Here we compared the efficacy of four kits from Invitrogen, 101Bio, Wako and iZON along with conventional ultracentrifugation-based method for exosome yield, purity and quality. Cell culture supernatant was used as an abundant source of exosomes, and exosome quantity, size-distribution, zeta-potential, marker-expression and RNA/protein quality were determined. The Invitrogen kit gave the highest yield but the preparation showed broader size-distribution likely due to microvesicle co-precipitation and had the least dispersion stability. Other preparations showed <150 nm size range and good stability. Preparation from iZON column; however, had a broader size-distribution in the lower size range suggestive of some impurities of non-vesicular aggregates. RNA quality from all preparations was comparable; however, proteins from Invitrogen method-based exosomal preparation showed polyethylene glycol (PEG) contamination in mass spectrometry. Chemical impurities from the precipitant could also be the cause of toxicity of Invitrogen method-based exosomal preparation in biological growth measurement assay. Together, these findings should serve as a guide to choose and further optimize exosome isolation methods for their desired downstream applications. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6441044/ /pubmed/30926864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41800-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Patel, Girijesh Kumar Khan, Mohammad Aslam Zubair, Haseeb Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar Khushman, Moh’d Singh, Seema Singh, Ajay Pratap Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications |
title | Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications |
title_full | Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications |
title_short | Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications |
title_sort | comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30926864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41800-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelgirijeshkumar comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications AT khanmohammadaslam comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications AT zubairhaseeb comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications AT srivastavasanjeevkumar comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications AT khushmanmohd comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications AT singhseema comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications AT singhajaypratap comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications |