Cargando…

Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications

Exosomes have received significant attention for their role in pathobiological processes and are being explored as a tool for disease diagnosis and management. Consequently, various isolation methods based on different principles have been developed for exosome isolation. Here we compared the effica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Girijesh Kumar, Khan, Mohammad Aslam, Zubair, Haseeb, Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar, Khushman, Moh’d, Singh, Seema, Singh, Ajay Pratap
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30926864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41800-2
_version_ 1783407478493413376
author Patel, Girijesh Kumar
Khan, Mohammad Aslam
Zubair, Haseeb
Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar
Khushman, Moh’d
Singh, Seema
Singh, Ajay Pratap
author_facet Patel, Girijesh Kumar
Khan, Mohammad Aslam
Zubair, Haseeb
Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar
Khushman, Moh’d
Singh, Seema
Singh, Ajay Pratap
author_sort Patel, Girijesh Kumar
collection PubMed
description Exosomes have received significant attention for their role in pathobiological processes and are being explored as a tool for disease diagnosis and management. Consequently, various isolation methods based on different principles have been developed for exosome isolation. Here we compared the efficacy of four kits from Invitrogen, 101Bio, Wako and iZON along with conventional ultracentrifugation-based method for exosome yield, purity and quality. Cell culture supernatant was used as an abundant source of exosomes, and exosome quantity, size-distribution, zeta-potential, marker-expression and RNA/protein quality were determined. The Invitrogen kit gave the highest yield but the preparation showed broader size-distribution likely due to microvesicle co-precipitation and had the least dispersion stability. Other preparations showed <150 nm size range and good stability. Preparation from iZON column; however, had a broader size-distribution in the lower size range suggestive of some impurities of non-vesicular aggregates. RNA quality from all preparations was comparable; however, proteins from Invitrogen method-based exosomal preparation showed polyethylene glycol (PEG) contamination in mass spectrometry. Chemical impurities from the precipitant could also be the cause of toxicity of Invitrogen method-based exosomal preparation in biological growth measurement assay. Together, these findings should serve as a guide to choose and further optimize exosome isolation methods for their desired downstream applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6441044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64410442019-04-04 Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications Patel, Girijesh Kumar Khan, Mohammad Aslam Zubair, Haseeb Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar Khushman, Moh’d Singh, Seema Singh, Ajay Pratap Sci Rep Article Exosomes have received significant attention for their role in pathobiological processes and are being explored as a tool for disease diagnosis and management. Consequently, various isolation methods based on different principles have been developed for exosome isolation. Here we compared the efficacy of four kits from Invitrogen, 101Bio, Wako and iZON along with conventional ultracentrifugation-based method for exosome yield, purity and quality. Cell culture supernatant was used as an abundant source of exosomes, and exosome quantity, size-distribution, zeta-potential, marker-expression and RNA/protein quality were determined. The Invitrogen kit gave the highest yield but the preparation showed broader size-distribution likely due to microvesicle co-precipitation and had the least dispersion stability. Other preparations showed <150 nm size range and good stability. Preparation from iZON column; however, had a broader size-distribution in the lower size range suggestive of some impurities of non-vesicular aggregates. RNA quality from all preparations was comparable; however, proteins from Invitrogen method-based exosomal preparation showed polyethylene glycol (PEG) contamination in mass spectrometry. Chemical impurities from the precipitant could also be the cause of toxicity of Invitrogen method-based exosomal preparation in biological growth measurement assay. Together, these findings should serve as a guide to choose and further optimize exosome isolation methods for their desired downstream applications. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6441044/ /pubmed/30926864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41800-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Patel, Girijesh Kumar
Khan, Mohammad Aslam
Zubair, Haseeb
Srivastava, Sanjeev Kumar
Khushman, Moh’d
Singh, Seema
Singh, Ajay Pratap
Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications
title Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications
title_full Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications
title_short Comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications
title_sort comparative analysis of exosome isolation methods using culture supernatant for optimum yield, purity and downstream applications
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30926864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41800-2
work_keys_str_mv AT patelgirijeshkumar comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications
AT khanmohammadaslam comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications
AT zubairhaseeb comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications
AT srivastavasanjeevkumar comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications
AT khushmanmohd comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications
AT singhseema comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications
AT singhajaypratap comparativeanalysisofexosomeisolationmethodsusingculturesupernatantforoptimumyieldpurityanddownstreamapplications