Cargando…

Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: Waiting lists should be managed as fairly as possible to ensure that patients with greater or more urgent needs receive services first. Patient prioritization refers to the process of ranking referrals in a certain order based on various criteria with the aim of improving fairness and eq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Déry, Julien, Ruiz, Angel, Routhier, François, Gagnon, Marie-Pierre, Côté, André, Ait-Kadi, Daoud, Bélanger, Valérie, Deslauriers, Simon, Lamontagne, Marie-Eve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x
_version_ 1783407518213472256
author Déry, Julien
Ruiz, Angel
Routhier, François
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Côté, André
Ait-Kadi, Daoud
Bélanger, Valérie
Deslauriers, Simon
Lamontagne, Marie-Eve
author_facet Déry, Julien
Ruiz, Angel
Routhier, François
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Côté, André
Ait-Kadi, Daoud
Bélanger, Valérie
Deslauriers, Simon
Lamontagne, Marie-Eve
author_sort Déry, Julien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Waiting lists should be managed as fairly as possible to ensure that patients with greater or more urgent needs receive services first. Patient prioritization refers to the process of ranking referrals in a certain order based on various criteria with the aim of improving fairness and equity in the delivery of care. Despite the widespread use of patient prioritization tools (PPTs) in healthcare services, the existing literature on this subject has mainly focused on emergency settings. Evidence has not been synthesized with respect to all the non-emergency services. METHODS: This review aims to perform a systematic synthesis of published evidence concerning (1) prioritization tools’ characteristics, (2) their metrological properties, and (3) their effect measures across non-emergency services. Five electronic databases will be searched (Cochrane Library, Ovid/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL). Eligibility criteria guiding data selection will be (1) qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods empirical studies; (2) patient prioritization in any non-emergency setting; and (3) discussing characteristic, metrological properties, or effect measures. Data will be sought to report tool’s format, description, population, setting, purpose, criteria, developer, metrological properties, and outcome measures. Two reviewers will independently screen, select, and extract data. Data will be synthesized with sequential exploratory design method. We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) to assess the quality of articles included in the review. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide much-needed knowledge regarding patient prioritization tools. The results will benefit clinicians, decision-makers, and researchers by giving them a better understanding of the methods used to prioritize patients in clinical settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018107205 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6441215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64412152019-04-11 Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol Déry, Julien Ruiz, Angel Routhier, François Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Côté, André Ait-Kadi, Daoud Bélanger, Valérie Deslauriers, Simon Lamontagne, Marie-Eve Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Waiting lists should be managed as fairly as possible to ensure that patients with greater or more urgent needs receive services first. Patient prioritization refers to the process of ranking referrals in a certain order based on various criteria with the aim of improving fairness and equity in the delivery of care. Despite the widespread use of patient prioritization tools (PPTs) in healthcare services, the existing literature on this subject has mainly focused on emergency settings. Evidence has not been synthesized with respect to all the non-emergency services. METHODS: This review aims to perform a systematic synthesis of published evidence concerning (1) prioritization tools’ characteristics, (2) their metrological properties, and (3) their effect measures across non-emergency services. Five electronic databases will be searched (Cochrane Library, Ovid/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL). Eligibility criteria guiding data selection will be (1) qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods empirical studies; (2) patient prioritization in any non-emergency setting; and (3) discussing characteristic, metrological properties, or effect measures. Data will be sought to report tool’s format, description, population, setting, purpose, criteria, developer, metrological properties, and outcome measures. Two reviewers will independently screen, select, and extract data. Data will be synthesized with sequential exploratory design method. We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) to assess the quality of articles included in the review. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide much-needed knowledge regarding patient prioritization tools. The results will benefit clinicians, decision-makers, and researchers by giving them a better understanding of the methods used to prioritize patients in clinical settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018107205 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6441215/ /pubmed/30927927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Déry, Julien
Ruiz, Angel
Routhier, François
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
Côté, André
Ait-Kadi, Daoud
Bélanger, Valérie
Deslauriers, Simon
Lamontagne, Marie-Eve
Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol
title Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol
title_full Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol
title_short Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol
title_sort patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x
work_keys_str_mv AT deryjulien patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT ruizangel patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT routhierfrancois patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT gagnonmariepierre patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT coteandre patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT aitkadidaoud patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT belangervalerie patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT deslaurierssimon patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol
AT lamontagnemarieeve patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol