Cargando…
Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol
BACKGROUND: Waiting lists should be managed as fairly as possible to ensure that patients with greater or more urgent needs receive services first. Patient prioritization refers to the process of ranking referrals in a certain order based on various criteria with the aim of improving fairness and eq...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x |
_version_ | 1783407518213472256 |
---|---|
author | Déry, Julien Ruiz, Angel Routhier, François Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Côté, André Ait-Kadi, Daoud Bélanger, Valérie Deslauriers, Simon Lamontagne, Marie-Eve |
author_facet | Déry, Julien Ruiz, Angel Routhier, François Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Côté, André Ait-Kadi, Daoud Bélanger, Valérie Deslauriers, Simon Lamontagne, Marie-Eve |
author_sort | Déry, Julien |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Waiting lists should be managed as fairly as possible to ensure that patients with greater or more urgent needs receive services first. Patient prioritization refers to the process of ranking referrals in a certain order based on various criteria with the aim of improving fairness and equity in the delivery of care. Despite the widespread use of patient prioritization tools (PPTs) in healthcare services, the existing literature on this subject has mainly focused on emergency settings. Evidence has not been synthesized with respect to all the non-emergency services. METHODS: This review aims to perform a systematic synthesis of published evidence concerning (1) prioritization tools’ characteristics, (2) their metrological properties, and (3) their effect measures across non-emergency services. Five electronic databases will be searched (Cochrane Library, Ovid/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL). Eligibility criteria guiding data selection will be (1) qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods empirical studies; (2) patient prioritization in any non-emergency setting; and (3) discussing characteristic, metrological properties, or effect measures. Data will be sought to report tool’s format, description, population, setting, purpose, criteria, developer, metrological properties, and outcome measures. Two reviewers will independently screen, select, and extract data. Data will be synthesized with sequential exploratory design method. We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) to assess the quality of articles included in the review. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide much-needed knowledge regarding patient prioritization tools. The results will benefit clinicians, decision-makers, and researchers by giving them a better understanding of the methods used to prioritize patients in clinical settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018107205 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6441215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64412152019-04-11 Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol Déry, Julien Ruiz, Angel Routhier, François Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Côté, André Ait-Kadi, Daoud Bélanger, Valérie Deslauriers, Simon Lamontagne, Marie-Eve Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Waiting lists should be managed as fairly as possible to ensure that patients with greater or more urgent needs receive services first. Patient prioritization refers to the process of ranking referrals in a certain order based on various criteria with the aim of improving fairness and equity in the delivery of care. Despite the widespread use of patient prioritization tools (PPTs) in healthcare services, the existing literature on this subject has mainly focused on emergency settings. Evidence has not been synthesized with respect to all the non-emergency services. METHODS: This review aims to perform a systematic synthesis of published evidence concerning (1) prioritization tools’ characteristics, (2) their metrological properties, and (3) their effect measures across non-emergency services. Five electronic databases will be searched (Cochrane Library, Ovid/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and CINAHL). Eligibility criteria guiding data selection will be (1) qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods empirical studies; (2) patient prioritization in any non-emergency setting; and (3) discussing characteristic, metrological properties, or effect measures. Data will be sought to report tool’s format, description, population, setting, purpose, criteria, developer, metrological properties, and outcome measures. Two reviewers will independently screen, select, and extract data. Data will be synthesized with sequential exploratory design method. We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) to assess the quality of articles included in the review. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will provide much-needed knowledge regarding patient prioritization tools. The results will benefit clinicians, decision-makers, and researchers by giving them a better understanding of the methods used to prioritize patients in clinical settings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018107205 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6441215/ /pubmed/30927927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Déry, Julien Ruiz, Angel Routhier, François Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Côté, André Ait-Kadi, Daoud Bélanger, Valérie Deslauriers, Simon Lamontagne, Marie-Eve Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol |
title | Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol |
title_full | Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol |
title_short | Patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol |
title_sort | patient prioritization tools and their effectiveness in non-emergency healthcare services: a systematic review protocol |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30927927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0992-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deryjulien patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol AT ruizangel patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol AT routhierfrancois patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol AT gagnonmariepierre patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol AT coteandre patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol AT aitkadidaoud patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol AT belangervalerie patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol AT deslaurierssimon patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol AT lamontagnemarieeve patientprioritizationtoolsandtheireffectivenessinnonemergencyhealthcareservicesasystematicreviewprotocol |