Cargando…
The Optimizing-Risk-Communication (OptRisk) randomized trial – impact of decision-aid-based consultation on adherence and perception of cardiovascular risk
BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is a well-established approach to increasing patient participation in medical decisions. Increasingly, using lifetime-risk or time-to-event (TTE) formats has been suggested, as these might have advantages in comparison with a 10-year risk prognosis, particularly fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30988601 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S197545 |
_version_ | 1783407563009687552 |
---|---|
author | Adarkwah, Charles Christian Jegan, Nikita Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika Kühne, Felicitas Siebert, Uwe Popert, Uwe Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert Kürwitz, Sarah |
author_facet | Adarkwah, Charles Christian Jegan, Nikita Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika Kühne, Felicitas Siebert, Uwe Popert, Uwe Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert Kürwitz, Sarah |
author_sort | Adarkwah, Charles Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is a well-established approach to increasing patient participation in medical decisions. Increasingly, using lifetime-risk or time-to-event (TTE) formats has been suggested, as these might have advantages in comparison with a 10-year risk prognosis, particularly for younger patients, whose lifetime risk for some events may be considerably greater than their 10-year risk. In this study, a randomized trial, the most popular 10-year risk illustration in the decision-aid software Arriba (emoticons), is compared with a newly developed TTE illustration, which is based on a Markov model. The study compares the effect of these two methods of presenting cardiovascular risk to patients on their subsequent adherence to intervention. METHODS: A total of 294 patients were interviewed 3 months after they had had a consultation with their GP on cardiovascular risk prevention. Adherence to behavioral change or medication intervention was measured as the primary outcome. The latter was expressed as a generated score. Furthermore, different secondary outcomes were measured, ie, patient perception of risk and self-rated importance of avoiding a cardiovascular event, as well as patient numeracy, which was used as a proxy for patient health literacy. RESULTS: Overall, no significant difference in patient adherence was found depending on risk representation. In the emoticon group, the number of interventions had a significant impact on the adherence score (P=0.025). Perception of risk was significantly higher in patients counseled with the TTE risk display, whereas the importance of avoiding a cardiovascular event was rated equally highly in both groups and actually increased over time. CONCLUSION: The TTE format is an appropriate means for counseling patients. Adherence is a very complex construct, which cannot be fully explained by our findings. The study results support our call for considering TTE illustrations as a valuable alternative to current decision-support tools covering cardiovascular prevention. Nevertheless, further research is needed to shed light on patient motivation and adherence with regard to cardiovascular risk prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register and at the WHO International Clinical Trials Register Platform (ICTRP, ID DRKS00004933); registered February 2, 2016 (retrospectively registered). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6441552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64415522019-04-15 The Optimizing-Risk-Communication (OptRisk) randomized trial – impact of decision-aid-based consultation on adherence and perception of cardiovascular risk Adarkwah, Charles Christian Jegan, Nikita Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika Kühne, Felicitas Siebert, Uwe Popert, Uwe Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert Kürwitz, Sarah Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making is a well-established approach to increasing patient participation in medical decisions. Increasingly, using lifetime-risk or time-to-event (TTE) formats has been suggested, as these might have advantages in comparison with a 10-year risk prognosis, particularly for younger patients, whose lifetime risk for some events may be considerably greater than their 10-year risk. In this study, a randomized trial, the most popular 10-year risk illustration in the decision-aid software Arriba (emoticons), is compared with a newly developed TTE illustration, which is based on a Markov model. The study compares the effect of these two methods of presenting cardiovascular risk to patients on their subsequent adherence to intervention. METHODS: A total of 294 patients were interviewed 3 months after they had had a consultation with their GP on cardiovascular risk prevention. Adherence to behavioral change or medication intervention was measured as the primary outcome. The latter was expressed as a generated score. Furthermore, different secondary outcomes were measured, ie, patient perception of risk and self-rated importance of avoiding a cardiovascular event, as well as patient numeracy, which was used as a proxy for patient health literacy. RESULTS: Overall, no significant difference in patient adherence was found depending on risk representation. In the emoticon group, the number of interventions had a significant impact on the adherence score (P=0.025). Perception of risk was significantly higher in patients counseled with the TTE risk display, whereas the importance of avoiding a cardiovascular event was rated equally highly in both groups and actually increased over time. CONCLUSION: The TTE format is an appropriate means for counseling patients. Adherence is a very complex construct, which cannot be fully explained by our findings. The study results support our call for considering TTE illustrations as a valuable alternative to current decision-support tools covering cardiovascular prevention. Nevertheless, further research is needed to shed light on patient motivation and adherence with regard to cardiovascular risk prevention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register and at the WHO International Clinical Trials Register Platform (ICTRP, ID DRKS00004933); registered February 2, 2016 (retrospectively registered). Dove Medical Press 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6441552/ /pubmed/30988601 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S197545 Text en © 2019 Adarkwah et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Adarkwah, Charles Christian Jegan, Nikita Heinzel-Gutenbrunner, Monika Kühne, Felicitas Siebert, Uwe Popert, Uwe Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert Kürwitz, Sarah The Optimizing-Risk-Communication (OptRisk) randomized trial – impact of decision-aid-based consultation on adherence and perception of cardiovascular risk |
title | The Optimizing-Risk-Communication (OptRisk) randomized trial – impact of decision-aid-based consultation on adherence and perception of cardiovascular risk |
title_full | The Optimizing-Risk-Communication (OptRisk) randomized trial – impact of decision-aid-based consultation on adherence and perception of cardiovascular risk |
title_fullStr | The Optimizing-Risk-Communication (OptRisk) randomized trial – impact of decision-aid-based consultation on adherence and perception of cardiovascular risk |
title_full_unstemmed | The Optimizing-Risk-Communication (OptRisk) randomized trial – impact of decision-aid-based consultation on adherence and perception of cardiovascular risk |
title_short | The Optimizing-Risk-Communication (OptRisk) randomized trial – impact of decision-aid-based consultation on adherence and perception of cardiovascular risk |
title_sort | optimizing-risk-communication (optrisk) randomized trial – impact of decision-aid-based consultation on adherence and perception of cardiovascular risk |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30988601 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S197545 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adarkwahcharleschristian theoptimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT jegannikita theoptimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT heinzelgutenbrunnermonika theoptimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT kuhnefelicitas theoptimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT siebertuwe theoptimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT popertuwe theoptimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT donnerbanzhoffnorbert theoptimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT kurwitzsarah theoptimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT adarkwahcharleschristian optimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT jegannikita optimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT heinzelgutenbrunnermonika optimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT kuhnefelicitas optimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT siebertuwe optimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT popertuwe optimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT donnerbanzhoffnorbert optimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk AT kurwitzsarah optimizingriskcommunicationoptriskrandomizedtrialimpactofdecisionaidbasedconsultationonadherenceandperceptionofcardiovascularrisk |