Cargando…
Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula
After removal of a dental implant or extraction of a tooth in the upper jaw, the closure of an oroantral fistula (OAF) or oroantral communication (OAC) can be a difficult problem confronting the dentist and surgeon working in the oral and maxillofacial region. Oroantral communication (OAC) acts as a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-019-0165-7 |
_version_ | 1783407580715941888 |
---|---|
author | Parvini, Puria Obreja, Karina Begic, Amira Schwarz, Frank Becker, Jürgen Sader, Robert Salti, Loutfi |
author_facet | Parvini, Puria Obreja, Karina Begic, Amira Schwarz, Frank Becker, Jürgen Sader, Robert Salti, Loutfi |
author_sort | Parvini, Puria |
collection | PubMed |
description | After removal of a dental implant or extraction of a tooth in the upper jaw, the closure of an oroantral fistula (OAF) or oroantral communication (OAC) can be a difficult problem confronting the dentist and surgeon working in the oral and maxillofacial region. Oroantral communication (OAC) acts as a pathological pathway for bacteria and can cause infection of the antrum, which further obstructs the healing process as it is an unnatural communication between the oral cavity and the maxillary sinus. There are different ways to perform the surgical closure of the OAC. The decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula is influenced by many factors. Consequently, it requires a combination of knowledge, experience, and information gathering. Previous narrative research has focused on assessments and comparisons of various surgical techniques for the closure of OAC/OAF. Thus, the decision-making process has not yet been described comprehensively. The present study aims to illustrate all the factors that have to be considered in the management of OACs and OAFs that determine optimal treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6441669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64416692019-04-17 Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula Parvini, Puria Obreja, Karina Begic, Amira Schwarz, Frank Becker, Jürgen Sader, Robert Salti, Loutfi Int J Implant Dent Review After removal of a dental implant or extraction of a tooth in the upper jaw, the closure of an oroantral fistula (OAF) or oroantral communication (OAC) can be a difficult problem confronting the dentist and surgeon working in the oral and maxillofacial region. Oroantral communication (OAC) acts as a pathological pathway for bacteria and can cause infection of the antrum, which further obstructs the healing process as it is an unnatural communication between the oral cavity and the maxillary sinus. There are different ways to perform the surgical closure of the OAC. The decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula is influenced by many factors. Consequently, it requires a combination of knowledge, experience, and information gathering. Previous narrative research has focused on assessments and comparisons of various surgical techniques for the closure of OAC/OAF. Thus, the decision-making process has not yet been described comprehensively. The present study aims to illustrate all the factors that have to be considered in the management of OACs and OAFs that determine optimal treatment. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6441669/ /pubmed/30931487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-019-0165-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Parvini, Puria Obreja, Karina Begic, Amira Schwarz, Frank Becker, Jürgen Sader, Robert Salti, Loutfi Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula |
title | Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula |
title_full | Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula |
title_fullStr | Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula |
title_full_unstemmed | Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula |
title_short | Decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula |
title_sort | decision-making in closure of oroantral communication and fistula |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40729-019-0165-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parvinipuria decisionmakinginclosureoforoantralcommunicationandfistula AT obrejakarina decisionmakinginclosureoforoantralcommunicationandfistula AT begicamira decisionmakinginclosureoforoantralcommunicationandfistula AT schwarzfrank decisionmakinginclosureoforoantralcommunicationandfistula AT beckerjurgen decisionmakinginclosureoforoantralcommunicationandfistula AT saderrobert decisionmakinginclosureoforoantralcommunicationandfistula AT saltiloutfi decisionmakinginclosureoforoantralcommunicationandfistula |