Cargando…

Left atrial volume quantification using coronary calcium score scan: Feasibility, reliability and reproducibility analysis of a standardized approach()

BACKGROUND: Left atrial volume (LAV) is an independent prognosticator of cardiovascular events. We investigated whether LAV could be accurately and reliably measured using coronary calcium score (CAC) scan. METHODS: We retrospectively selected consecutive patients that underwent coronary CT angiogra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cardona, Andrea, Trovato, Vincenzo, Nagaraja, Haikady N., Raman, Subha V., Harfi, Thura T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100351
_version_ 1783407593829433344
author Cardona, Andrea
Trovato, Vincenzo
Nagaraja, Haikady N.
Raman, Subha V.
Harfi, Thura T.
author_facet Cardona, Andrea
Trovato, Vincenzo
Nagaraja, Haikady N.
Raman, Subha V.
Harfi, Thura T.
author_sort Cardona, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Left atrial volume (LAV) is an independent prognosticator of cardiovascular events. We investigated whether LAV could be accurately and reliably measured using coronary calcium score (CAC) scan. METHODS: We retrospectively selected consecutive patients that underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and CAC scans. A standardized approach to calculate LAV on images was implemented. The measurements of the LAV on CAC scans and CCTA were performed one to three weeks apart in a random fashion by two readers blinded to the results of each other. The LAV measurements from CAC scan were compared to those from CCTA using correlation analysis. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of LAV measurement using CAC scan was evaluated. RESULTS: Final analysis included one hundred subjects, mean age 52 ± 12 years, 48% male. There was a trend of a marginally larger, albeit not clinically significant, mean LAV calculated using CAC scan compared to that using CCTA: 74.3 vs. 71.0 mL: p < 0.001; for reader 1, and 71.7 vs. 71.2 mL p = 0.06 for reader 2, respectively. LAV using CAC scan and CCTA were highly correlated (R = 0.954, p < 0.001 for reader1 and R = 0.945, p < 0.001 for reader 2). There was high reproducibility within each reader with ICC of 0.951 and 0.989 for readers 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.001). Finally, there was high inter-observer agreement as indicated by R of 0.97 and ICC of 0.96 (p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of LAV from CAC scan using the proposed standardized approach is feasible, highly reliable and reproducible as compared to CCTA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6441762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64417622019-04-11 Left atrial volume quantification using coronary calcium score scan: Feasibility, reliability and reproducibility analysis of a standardized approach() Cardona, Andrea Trovato, Vincenzo Nagaraja, Haikady N. Raman, Subha V. Harfi, Thura T. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper BACKGROUND: Left atrial volume (LAV) is an independent prognosticator of cardiovascular events. We investigated whether LAV could be accurately and reliably measured using coronary calcium score (CAC) scan. METHODS: We retrospectively selected consecutive patients that underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and CAC scans. A standardized approach to calculate LAV on images was implemented. The measurements of the LAV on CAC scans and CCTA were performed one to three weeks apart in a random fashion by two readers blinded to the results of each other. The LAV measurements from CAC scan were compared to those from CCTA using correlation analysis. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of LAV measurement using CAC scan was evaluated. RESULTS: Final analysis included one hundred subjects, mean age 52 ± 12 years, 48% male. There was a trend of a marginally larger, albeit not clinically significant, mean LAV calculated using CAC scan compared to that using CCTA: 74.3 vs. 71.0 mL: p < 0.001; for reader 1, and 71.7 vs. 71.2 mL p = 0.06 for reader 2, respectively. LAV using CAC scan and CCTA were highly correlated (R = 0.954, p < 0.001 for reader1 and R = 0.945, p < 0.001 for reader 2). There was high reproducibility within each reader with ICC of 0.951 and 0.989 for readers 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.001). Finally, there was high inter-observer agreement as indicated by R of 0.97 and ICC of 0.96 (p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of LAV from CAC scan using the proposed standardized approach is feasible, highly reliable and reproducible as compared to CCTA. Elsevier 2019-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6441762/ /pubmed/30976656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100351 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cardona, Andrea
Trovato, Vincenzo
Nagaraja, Haikady N.
Raman, Subha V.
Harfi, Thura T.
Left atrial volume quantification using coronary calcium score scan: Feasibility, reliability and reproducibility analysis of a standardized approach()
title Left atrial volume quantification using coronary calcium score scan: Feasibility, reliability and reproducibility analysis of a standardized approach()
title_full Left atrial volume quantification using coronary calcium score scan: Feasibility, reliability and reproducibility analysis of a standardized approach()
title_fullStr Left atrial volume quantification using coronary calcium score scan: Feasibility, reliability and reproducibility analysis of a standardized approach()
title_full_unstemmed Left atrial volume quantification using coronary calcium score scan: Feasibility, reliability and reproducibility analysis of a standardized approach()
title_short Left atrial volume quantification using coronary calcium score scan: Feasibility, reliability and reproducibility analysis of a standardized approach()
title_sort left atrial volume quantification using coronary calcium score scan: feasibility, reliability and reproducibility analysis of a standardized approach()
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100351
work_keys_str_mv AT cardonaandrea leftatrialvolumequantificationusingcoronarycalciumscorescanfeasibilityreliabilityandreproducibilityanalysisofastandardizedapproach
AT trovatovincenzo leftatrialvolumequantificationusingcoronarycalciumscorescanfeasibilityreliabilityandreproducibilityanalysisofastandardizedapproach
AT nagarajahaikadyn leftatrialvolumequantificationusingcoronarycalciumscorescanfeasibilityreliabilityandreproducibilityanalysisofastandardizedapproach
AT ramansubhav leftatrialvolumequantificationusingcoronarycalciumscorescanfeasibilityreliabilityandreproducibilityanalysisofastandardizedapproach
AT harfithurat leftatrialvolumequantificationusingcoronarycalciumscorescanfeasibilityreliabilityandreproducibilityanalysisofastandardizedapproach