Cargando…

Rep and UvrD Antagonize One Another at Stalled Replication Forks and This Is Exacerbated by SSB

[Image: see text] The Rep and UvrD DNA helicases are proposed to act at stalled DNA replication forks to facilitate replication restart when RNA polymerase stalls forks. To clarify the role of these DNA helicases in fork rescue, we used a coupled spectrophotometric ATPase assay to determine how they...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xiaoyi, Seet, Jiun Xiang, Shi, Yi, Bianco, Piero R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02375
_version_ 1783407629630963712
author Liu, Xiaoyi
Seet, Jiun Xiang
Shi, Yi
Bianco, Piero R.
author_facet Liu, Xiaoyi
Seet, Jiun Xiang
Shi, Yi
Bianco, Piero R.
author_sort Liu, Xiaoyi
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The Rep and UvrD DNA helicases are proposed to act at stalled DNA replication forks to facilitate replication restart when RNA polymerase stalls forks. To clarify the role of these DNA helicases in fork rescue, we used a coupled spectrophotometric ATPase assay to determine how they act on model fork substrates. For both enzymes, activity is low on regressed fork structures, suggesting that they act prior to the regression step that generates a Holliday junction. In fact, the preferred cofactors for both enzymes are forks with a gap in the nascent leading strand, consistent with the 3′–5′ direction of translocation. Surprisingly, for Rep, this specificity is altered in the presence of stoichiometric amounts of a single-strand DNA-binding protein (SSB) relative to a fork with a gap in the nascent lagging strand. Even though Rep and UvrD are similar in structure, elevated concentrations of SSB inhibit Rep, but they have little to no effect on UvrD. Furthermore, Rep and UvrD antagonize one another at a fork. This is surprising given that these helicases have been shown to form a heterodimer and are proposed to act together to rescue an RNA polymerase-stalled fork. Consequently, the results herein indicate that although Rep and UvrD can act on similar fork substrates, they cannot function on the same fork simultaneously.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6441946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64419462019-04-02 Rep and UvrD Antagonize One Another at Stalled Replication Forks and This Is Exacerbated by SSB Liu, Xiaoyi Seet, Jiun Xiang Shi, Yi Bianco, Piero R. ACS Omega [Image: see text] The Rep and UvrD DNA helicases are proposed to act at stalled DNA replication forks to facilitate replication restart when RNA polymerase stalls forks. To clarify the role of these DNA helicases in fork rescue, we used a coupled spectrophotometric ATPase assay to determine how they act on model fork substrates. For both enzymes, activity is low on regressed fork structures, suggesting that they act prior to the regression step that generates a Holliday junction. In fact, the preferred cofactors for both enzymes are forks with a gap in the nascent leading strand, consistent with the 3′–5′ direction of translocation. Surprisingly, for Rep, this specificity is altered in the presence of stoichiometric amounts of a single-strand DNA-binding protein (SSB) relative to a fork with a gap in the nascent lagging strand. Even though Rep and UvrD are similar in structure, elevated concentrations of SSB inhibit Rep, but they have little to no effect on UvrD. Furthermore, Rep and UvrD antagonize one another at a fork. This is surprising given that these helicases have been shown to form a heterodimer and are proposed to act together to rescue an RNA polymerase-stalled fork. Consequently, the results herein indicate that although Rep and UvrD can act on similar fork substrates, they cannot function on the same fork simultaneously. American Chemical Society 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6441946/ /pubmed/30949615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02375 Text en Copyright © 2019 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Liu, Xiaoyi
Seet, Jiun Xiang
Shi, Yi
Bianco, Piero R.
Rep and UvrD Antagonize One Another at Stalled Replication Forks and This Is Exacerbated by SSB
title Rep and UvrD Antagonize One Another at Stalled Replication Forks and This Is Exacerbated by SSB
title_full Rep and UvrD Antagonize One Another at Stalled Replication Forks and This Is Exacerbated by SSB
title_fullStr Rep and UvrD Antagonize One Another at Stalled Replication Forks and This Is Exacerbated by SSB
title_full_unstemmed Rep and UvrD Antagonize One Another at Stalled Replication Forks and This Is Exacerbated by SSB
title_short Rep and UvrD Antagonize One Another at Stalled Replication Forks and This Is Exacerbated by SSB
title_sort rep and uvrd antagonize one another at stalled replication forks and this is exacerbated by ssb
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b02375
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxiaoyi repanduvrdantagonizeoneanotheratstalledreplicationforksandthisisexacerbatedbyssb
AT seetjiunxiang repanduvrdantagonizeoneanotheratstalledreplicationforksandthisisexacerbatedbyssb
AT shiyi repanduvrdantagonizeoneanotheratstalledreplicationforksandthisisexacerbatedbyssb
AT biancopieror repanduvrdantagonizeoneanotheratstalledreplicationforksandthisisexacerbatedbyssb