Cargando…
The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy
OBJECTIVE: Parameters predictive of biochemical or clinical recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy (RP) were determined as pre-treatment PSA value, pathologic tumor stage, tumor grade and presence of Positive Surgical Margin (PSM), extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion and the status...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30325603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0702 |
_version_ | 1783407654029230080 |
---|---|
author | Evren, Ismail Hacıislamoğlu, Ahmet Ekşi, Mithat Yavuzsan, Abdullah Hızır Baytekin, Fırat Çolakoğlu, Yunus Canoğlu, Didem Tugcu, Volkan |
author_facet | Evren, Ismail Hacıislamoğlu, Ahmet Ekşi, Mithat Yavuzsan, Abdullah Hızır Baytekin, Fırat Çolakoğlu, Yunus Canoğlu, Didem Tugcu, Volkan |
author_sort | Evren, Ismail |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Parameters predictive of biochemical or clinical recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy (RP) were determined as pre-treatment PSA value, pathologic tumor stage, tumor grade and presence of Positive Surgical Margin (PSM), extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion and the status of pelvic lymph nodes. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of additional features in patients undergoing RP in our clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 556 RP operations performed between 2009 and 2016 for prostate cancer at this clinic. Preoperative and postoperative data of the patients were retrospectively reviewed. RP specimens were examined by two pathologists specialized in this subject. Of these patients, 78 (14.02%) patients with PSM were included in the study. The pathology slides of these patients were reassessed. The length of PSM (mm), localization (apex, basis and posterolateral) and Gleason pattern at this margin was determined and statistical correlations with BCR were calculated. RESULTS: The mean follow-up after the RP of 41 patients included in the study was 37.4 ± 13.2 months. During the follow-up period of the patients, BCR was observed in 16 patients (39.02%). No statistically significant difference was observed in age and prostate volume between the groups with and without BCR development (p > 0.05). Preoperative PSA level was found to be statistically significantly higher in the group with BCR development compared to the group without recurrence (p = 0.004). In-group comparisons in each aforementioned Gleason score groups were performed in terms of BCR development and the preoperative Gleason score in the group with development of recurrence was found to be statistically significantly higher compared to the group without recurrence (p = 0.007). The length of the surgical margin was measured as 7.4 ± 4.4 mm in the BCR-developing group and 4.7 ± 3.8 mm in the no-BCR- developing group; it was statistically significantly higher in the group with development of recurrence (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Length and location of the PSM and the Gleason score detected in the PSM region could not predict biochemical recurrence according to the results of this present study. However high preoperative PSA value is an independent prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6442133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64421332019-04-05 The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy Evren, Ismail Hacıislamoğlu, Ahmet Ekşi, Mithat Yavuzsan, Abdullah Hızır Baytekin, Fırat Çolakoğlu, Yunus Canoğlu, Didem Tugcu, Volkan Int Braz J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: Parameters predictive of biochemical or clinical recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy (RP) were determined as pre-treatment PSA value, pathologic tumor stage, tumor grade and presence of Positive Surgical Margin (PSM), extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion and the status of pelvic lymph nodes. The aim of our study is to evaluate the effect of additional features in patients undergoing RP in our clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 556 RP operations performed between 2009 and 2016 for prostate cancer at this clinic. Preoperative and postoperative data of the patients were retrospectively reviewed. RP specimens were examined by two pathologists specialized in this subject. Of these patients, 78 (14.02%) patients with PSM were included in the study. The pathology slides of these patients were reassessed. The length of PSM (mm), localization (apex, basis and posterolateral) and Gleason pattern at this margin was determined and statistical correlations with BCR were calculated. RESULTS: The mean follow-up after the RP of 41 patients included in the study was 37.4 ± 13.2 months. During the follow-up period of the patients, BCR was observed in 16 patients (39.02%). No statistically significant difference was observed in age and prostate volume between the groups with and without BCR development (p > 0.05). Preoperative PSA level was found to be statistically significantly higher in the group with BCR development compared to the group without recurrence (p = 0.004). In-group comparisons in each aforementioned Gleason score groups were performed in terms of BCR development and the preoperative Gleason score in the group with development of recurrence was found to be statistically significantly higher compared to the group without recurrence (p = 0.007). The length of the surgical margin was measured as 7.4 ± 4.4 mm in the BCR-developing group and 4.7 ± 3.8 mm in the no-BCR- developing group; it was statistically significantly higher in the group with development of recurrence (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Length and location of the PSM and the Gleason score detected in the PSM region could not predict biochemical recurrence according to the results of this present study. However high preoperative PSA value is an independent prognostic factor for biochemical recurrence. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6442133/ /pubmed/30325603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0702 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Evren, Ismail Hacıislamoğlu, Ahmet Ekşi, Mithat Yavuzsan, Abdullah Hızır Baytekin, Fırat Çolakoğlu, Yunus Canoğlu, Didem Tugcu, Volkan The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy |
title | The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy |
title_full | The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy |
title_fullStr | The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy |
title_short | The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy |
title_sort | impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30325603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT evrenismail theimpactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT hacıislamogluahmet theimpactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT eksimithat theimpactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT yavuzsanabdullahhızır theimpactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT baytekinfırat theimpactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT colakogluyunus theimpactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT canogludidem theimpactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT tugcuvolkan theimpactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT evrenismail impactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT hacıislamogluahmet impactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT eksimithat impactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT yavuzsanabdullahhızır impactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT baytekinfırat impactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT colakogluyunus impactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT canogludidem impactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy AT tugcuvolkan impactofsinglepositivesurgicalmarginfeaturesonbiochemicalrecurrenceafterroboticradicalprostatectomy |