Cargando…

Comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) on early renal function in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative urea, creatinine, Hb, eGFR values of patients who had undergone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ergin, Giray, Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan, Kıraç, Mustafa, Kilinc, Muhammet Fatih, Köprü, Burak, Keseroglu, Bugra Bilge, Hoscan, Mustafa Burak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29757580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0103
_version_ 1783407656786984960
author Ergin, Giray
Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan
Kıraç, Mustafa
Kilinc, Muhammet Fatih
Köprü, Burak
Keseroglu, Bugra Bilge
Hoscan, Mustafa Burak
author_facet Ergin, Giray
Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan
Kıraç, Mustafa
Kilinc, Muhammet Fatih
Köprü, Burak
Keseroglu, Bugra Bilge
Hoscan, Mustafa Burak
author_sort Ergin, Giray
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) on early renal function in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative urea, creatinine, Hb, eGFR values of patients who had undergone RALP and RRP with prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis were recorded in our clinic. The percentages of change in these values are calculated. Preoperative and postoperative urea, creatinine, Hb and eGFR changes were compared with each other. Student-t test was used for intergroup comparison, and paired sample t test was used to compare changes between preoperative and postoperative values of the same group. RESULTS: There were 160 and 93 patients in the RALP and RRP group, respectively. In the RALP group, postoperative urea and creatinine increased significantly compared to preoperative baseline values while eGFR was decreased (p = 0.0001, p = 0.001, p = 0.0001, respectively). Except for Hb in the RRP group, the changes in these values were statistically insignificant (p = 0.50, p = 0.75, p = 0.30, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We should be more careful when we perform RALP in patients at risk of impaired renal function despite being a minimally invasive surgical method with superior visual characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6442145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64421452019-04-05 Comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy Ergin, Giray Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan Kıraç, Mustafa Kilinc, Muhammet Fatih Köprü, Burak Keseroglu, Bugra Bilge Hoscan, Mustafa Burak Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) on early renal function in this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative urea, creatinine, Hb, eGFR values of patients who had undergone RALP and RRP with prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis were recorded in our clinic. The percentages of change in these values are calculated. Preoperative and postoperative urea, creatinine, Hb and eGFR changes were compared with each other. Student-t test was used for intergroup comparison, and paired sample t test was used to compare changes between preoperative and postoperative values of the same group. RESULTS: There were 160 and 93 patients in the RALP and RRP group, respectively. In the RALP group, postoperative urea and creatinine increased significantly compared to preoperative baseline values while eGFR was decreased (p = 0.0001, p = 0.001, p = 0.0001, respectively). Except for Hb in the RRP group, the changes in these values were statistically insignificant (p = 0.50, p = 0.75, p = 0.30, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We should be more careful when we perform RALP in patients at risk of impaired renal function despite being a minimally invasive surgical method with superior visual characteristics. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6442145/ /pubmed/29757580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0103 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ergin, Giray
Doluoglu, Omer Gokhan
Kıraç, Mustafa
Kilinc, Muhammet Fatih
Köprü, Burak
Keseroglu, Bugra Bilge
Hoscan, Mustafa Burak
Comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
title Comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
title_full Comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
title_short Comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
title_sort comparison of renal function after robot - assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29757580
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0103
work_keys_str_mv AT ergingiray comparisonofrenalfunctionafterrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyversusretropubicradicalprostatectomy
AT doluogluomergokhan comparisonofrenalfunctionafterrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyversusretropubicradicalprostatectomy
AT kıracmustafa comparisonofrenalfunctionafterrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyversusretropubicradicalprostatectomy
AT kilincmuhammetfatih comparisonofrenalfunctionafterrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyversusretropubicradicalprostatectomy
AT kopruburak comparisonofrenalfunctionafterrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyversusretropubicradicalprostatectomy
AT keseroglubugrabilge comparisonofrenalfunctionafterrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyversusretropubicradicalprostatectomy
AT hoscanmustafaburak comparisonofrenalfunctionafterrobotassistedlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyversusretropubicradicalprostatectomy