Cargando…

Implant of ATOMS(®) system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence: results of a single centre

PURPOSE: The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ATOMS(®) system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence (SUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients treated at our institution for postoperative male SUI with ATOMS(®) impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giammò, Alessandro, Ammirati, Enrico, Tullio, Annarita, Bodo, Gianni, Manassero, Alberto, Gontero, Paolo, Carone, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30521175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0171
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ATOMS(®) system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence (SUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients treated at our institution for postoperative male SUI with ATOMS(®) implant. We excluded patients with low bladder compliance (< 20 mL / cmH(2)O), uncontrolled detrusor overactivity, detrusor underactivity (BCI < 100), urethral or bladder neck stricture and low cystometric capacity (< 200 mL). RESULTS: From October 2014 to July 2017 we treated 52 patients, mean age 73.6 years. Most of them (92.3%) had undergone radical prostatectomy, 3.85% simple open prostatectomy, 3.85% TURP; 28.8% of patients had undergone urethral surgery, 11.5% adjuvant radiotherapy; 57.7% had already undergone surgical treatment for urinary incontinence. The average24 hours pad test was 411.6 g (180 – 1100). The mean follow-up was 20.1 months (8.1 – 41.5) 30.8% of patients were dry, 59.6% improved ≥ 50%, 7.7% improved < 50% and 1.9% unchanged. In total 73.1% reached social continence. There was a significant reduction of the 24 hours pad test and ICIQ - UI SF scores (p < 0.01). In the postoperative follow-up we detected complications in 8 patients (19%): 5 cases of displacement of the scrotal port, in 2 cases catheterization difficulties, one case of epididimitis and concomitant superficial wound infection; no prosthesis infection, nor explants. Radiotherapy, previous urethral surgery,previous incontinence surgery were not statistically related to social continence rates (p 0.65;p 0.11;p 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: The ATOMS(®) system is an effective and safe surgical treatment of mild and moderate male postoperative SUI with durable results in the short term.