Cargando…
Implant of ATOMS(®) system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence: results of a single centre
PURPOSE: The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ATOMS(®) system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence (SUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients treated at our institution for postoperative male SUI with ATOMS(®) impl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30521175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0171 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ATOMS(®) system for the treatment of postoperative male stress urinary incontinence (SUI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients treated at our institution for postoperative male SUI with ATOMS(®) implant. We excluded patients with low bladder compliance (< 20 mL / cmH(2)O), uncontrolled detrusor overactivity, detrusor underactivity (BCI < 100), urethral or bladder neck stricture and low cystometric capacity (< 200 mL). RESULTS: From October 2014 to July 2017 we treated 52 patients, mean age 73.6 years. Most of them (92.3%) had undergone radical prostatectomy, 3.85% simple open prostatectomy, 3.85% TURP; 28.8% of patients had undergone urethral surgery, 11.5% adjuvant radiotherapy; 57.7% had already undergone surgical treatment for urinary incontinence. The average24 hours pad test was 411.6 g (180 – 1100). The mean follow-up was 20.1 months (8.1 – 41.5) 30.8% of patients were dry, 59.6% improved ≥ 50%, 7.7% improved < 50% and 1.9% unchanged. In total 73.1% reached social continence. There was a significant reduction of the 24 hours pad test and ICIQ - UI SF scores (p < 0.01). In the postoperative follow-up we detected complications in 8 patients (19%): 5 cases of displacement of the scrotal port, in 2 cases catheterization difficulties, one case of epididimitis and concomitant superficial wound infection; no prosthesis infection, nor explants. Radiotherapy, previous urethral surgery,previous incontinence surgery were not statistically related to social continence rates (p 0.65;p 0.11;p 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: The ATOMS(®) system is an effective and safe surgical treatment of mild and moderate male postoperative SUI with durable results in the short term. |
---|