Cargando…
A martius flap in the treatment of iatrogenic distal urogenital fistula
INTRODUCTION: Distal urogenital fistulas (DUF) are usually iatrogenic and are uncommon in Europe. They occur in the urethra or near the bladder neck, and can be caused by vaginal hysterectomy, para-urethral cyst surgery, or erosion of the bladder or urethra from tension-free slings or meshes. The ps...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30088723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0444 |
_version_ | 1783407660970803200 |
---|---|
author | Ignjatovic, Ivan Basic, Dragoslav Potic, Milan Dinic, Ljubomir Skakic, Aleksandar |
author_facet | Ignjatovic, Ivan Basic, Dragoslav Potic, Milan Dinic, Ljubomir Skakic, Aleksandar |
author_sort | Ignjatovic, Ivan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Distal urogenital fistulas (DUF) are usually iatrogenic and are uncommon in Europe. They occur in the urethra or near the bladder neck, and can be caused by vaginal hysterectomy, para-urethral cyst surgery, or erosion of the bladder or urethra from tension-free slings or meshes. The psychological and physical health consequences of DUF are devastating because most patients consider themselves “healthy” before surgery. Incontinence can appear after successful DUF closure due to previously occult incontinence or urethral incompetence. Additional surgery for incontinence is sometimes necessary to achieve satisfactory outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Martius flap was used in 23 patients between 2000 and 2015. Patient age range was 38-75 years (mean, 58.7). DUF was due to gynecologic surgery for benign disease (15 / 23; 65.2%), mesh / sling erosion (2 / 23; 8.7%), and malignancy (6 / 23; 26.1%). The follow-up period was one year. RESULTS: DUF was closed in 22 patients (95.6%). Satisfaction and complete dryness was achieved in 16 patients (69.6%) after the first procedure. Postoperative complications were: postoperative hematoma in 1 (4.4%), primary failure in 1 (4.4%), overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in 3 (13.2%) and postoperative incontinence in 6 (26.4%) patients. A fascial sling was placed in patients with incontinence. All patients were dry after the secondary surgery. Anticholinergics were used for the treatment of OAB syndrome. Discomfort at the flap harvesting site was of minor importance. Finally, 22 out of 23 patients (95.6%) were satisfied. CONCLUSION: A Martius flap and additional fascial sling could be successfully used to optimize DUF treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6442163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64421632019-04-05 A martius flap in the treatment of iatrogenic distal urogenital fistula Ignjatovic, Ivan Basic, Dragoslav Potic, Milan Dinic, Ljubomir Skakic, Aleksandar Int Braz J Urol Video Section INTRODUCTION: Distal urogenital fistulas (DUF) are usually iatrogenic and are uncommon in Europe. They occur in the urethra or near the bladder neck, and can be caused by vaginal hysterectomy, para-urethral cyst surgery, or erosion of the bladder or urethra from tension-free slings or meshes. The psychological and physical health consequences of DUF are devastating because most patients consider themselves “healthy” before surgery. Incontinence can appear after successful DUF closure due to previously occult incontinence or urethral incompetence. Additional surgery for incontinence is sometimes necessary to achieve satisfactory outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Martius flap was used in 23 patients between 2000 and 2015. Patient age range was 38-75 years (mean, 58.7). DUF was due to gynecologic surgery for benign disease (15 / 23; 65.2%), mesh / sling erosion (2 / 23; 8.7%), and malignancy (6 / 23; 26.1%). The follow-up period was one year. RESULTS: DUF was closed in 22 patients (95.6%). Satisfaction and complete dryness was achieved in 16 patients (69.6%) after the first procedure. Postoperative complications were: postoperative hematoma in 1 (4.4%), primary failure in 1 (4.4%), overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in 3 (13.2%) and postoperative incontinence in 6 (26.4%) patients. A fascial sling was placed in patients with incontinence. All patients were dry after the secondary surgery. Anticholinergics were used for the treatment of OAB syndrome. Discomfort at the flap harvesting site was of minor importance. Finally, 22 out of 23 patients (95.6%) were satisfied. CONCLUSION: A Martius flap and additional fascial sling could be successfully used to optimize DUF treatment. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6442163/ /pubmed/30088723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0444 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Video Section Ignjatovic, Ivan Basic, Dragoslav Potic, Milan Dinic, Ljubomir Skakic, Aleksandar A martius flap in the treatment of iatrogenic distal urogenital fistula |
title | A martius flap in the treatment of iatrogenic distal urogenital fistula |
title_full | A martius flap in the treatment of iatrogenic distal urogenital fistula |
title_fullStr | A martius flap in the treatment of iatrogenic distal urogenital fistula |
title_full_unstemmed | A martius flap in the treatment of iatrogenic distal urogenital fistula |
title_short | A martius flap in the treatment of iatrogenic distal urogenital fistula |
title_sort | martius flap in the treatment of iatrogenic distal urogenital fistula |
topic | Video Section |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30088723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0444 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ignjatovicivan amartiusflapinthetreatmentofiatrogenicdistalurogenitalfistula AT basicdragoslav amartiusflapinthetreatmentofiatrogenicdistalurogenitalfistula AT poticmilan amartiusflapinthetreatmentofiatrogenicdistalurogenitalfistula AT dinicljubomir amartiusflapinthetreatmentofiatrogenicdistalurogenitalfistula AT skakicaleksandar amartiusflapinthetreatmentofiatrogenicdistalurogenitalfistula AT ignjatovicivan martiusflapinthetreatmentofiatrogenicdistalurogenitalfistula AT basicdragoslav martiusflapinthetreatmentofiatrogenicdistalurogenitalfistula AT poticmilan martiusflapinthetreatmentofiatrogenicdistalurogenitalfistula AT dinicljubomir martiusflapinthetreatmentofiatrogenicdistalurogenitalfistula AT skakicaleksandar martiusflapinthetreatmentofiatrogenicdistalurogenitalfistula |