Cargando…
Artificial sphincter “BR - SL - AS 904” in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: efficacy, practicality and safety in a prospective and multicenter study
PURPOSE: The objective of the present study is to test the efficiency and practicality of a new artificial sphincter “BR - SL - AS – 904” in the control of urinary incontinence in post - PR patients and to evaluate their complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with incontinence after o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30325613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0128 |
_version_ | 1783407661438468096 |
---|---|
author | Lima, Salvador Vilar Correia de Barros, Evandilson Guenes Campos Vilar, Fabio de Oliveira Pinto, Flavia Cristina Morone Barros, Thomé Décio Pinheiro Truzzi, José Carlos de Toledo, Luiz Gustavo M. Kanasiro, Francisco Amaro, João Luiz |
author_facet | Lima, Salvador Vilar Correia de Barros, Evandilson Guenes Campos Vilar, Fabio de Oliveira Pinto, Flavia Cristina Morone Barros, Thomé Décio Pinheiro Truzzi, José Carlos de Toledo, Luiz Gustavo M. Kanasiro, Francisco Amaro, João Luiz |
author_sort | Lima, Salvador Vilar Correia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The objective of the present study is to test the efficiency and practicality of a new artificial sphincter “BR - SL - AS – 904” in the control of urinary incontinence in post - PR patients and to evaluate their complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with incontinence after one year of radical prostatectomy were included prospectively. All patients underwent artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) implant “BR - SL - AS – 904” according to established technique. Independent variables such as free urinary flow, PAD weight test, ICIQ - SF score and urinary symptoms through the IPSS score were compared in different follow-up moments. RESULTS: Patients submitted to AUS implantation did not present trans - operative or post - operative complications related to the surgical act such as: infection, hematoma, erosion or urinary retention. Device was inert to the body during the follow-up, showing an excellent adaptation of the patients, besides the easy handling. The mean age was 68.20 years 40% of the patients had systemic arterial hypertension, 6.7% diabetes mellitus, 6.7% were hypertensive and diabetic, 13.4% were hypertensive, had diabetes and hypercholesterolemia and 26.7% patients had no comorbidities. It was evidenced that the urinary flow peak during the follow-up remained stable. Decreased averages and median PAD weight test were 135.19 to 75.72 and 106.00 to 23.50, respectively. The IPSS score decreased and the quality of life increased (12.33 to 3.40 and 2.50 to 3.20 respectively). The ICQF - SF questionnaire score also showed a decrease, ranging from 16, 71 to 7.33. CONCLUSION: The artificial sphincter implant “BR - SL - AS 904” was reproducible, safe and effective in the control of urinary incontinence in post - PR patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6442165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64421652019-04-05 Artificial sphincter “BR - SL - AS 904” in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: efficacy, practicality and safety in a prospective and multicenter study Lima, Salvador Vilar Correia de Barros, Evandilson Guenes Campos Vilar, Fabio de Oliveira Pinto, Flavia Cristina Morone Barros, Thomé Décio Pinheiro Truzzi, José Carlos de Toledo, Luiz Gustavo M. Kanasiro, Francisco Amaro, João Luiz Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: The objective of the present study is to test the efficiency and practicality of a new artificial sphincter “BR - SL - AS – 904” in the control of urinary incontinence in post - PR patients and to evaluate their complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with incontinence after one year of radical prostatectomy were included prospectively. All patients underwent artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) implant “BR - SL - AS – 904” according to established technique. Independent variables such as free urinary flow, PAD weight test, ICIQ - SF score and urinary symptoms through the IPSS score were compared in different follow-up moments. RESULTS: Patients submitted to AUS implantation did not present trans - operative or post - operative complications related to the surgical act such as: infection, hematoma, erosion or urinary retention. Device was inert to the body during the follow-up, showing an excellent adaptation of the patients, besides the easy handling. The mean age was 68.20 years 40% of the patients had systemic arterial hypertension, 6.7% diabetes mellitus, 6.7% were hypertensive and diabetic, 13.4% were hypertensive, had diabetes and hypercholesterolemia and 26.7% patients had no comorbidities. It was evidenced that the urinary flow peak during the follow-up remained stable. Decreased averages and median PAD weight test were 135.19 to 75.72 and 106.00 to 23.50, respectively. The IPSS score decreased and the quality of life increased (12.33 to 3.40 and 2.50 to 3.20 respectively). The ICQF - SF questionnaire score also showed a decrease, ranging from 16, 71 to 7.33. CONCLUSION: The artificial sphincter implant “BR - SL - AS 904” was reproducible, safe and effective in the control of urinary incontinence in post - PR patients. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6442165/ /pubmed/30325613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0128 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lima, Salvador Vilar Correia de Barros, Evandilson Guenes Campos Vilar, Fabio de Oliveira Pinto, Flavia Cristina Morone Barros, Thomé Décio Pinheiro Truzzi, José Carlos de Toledo, Luiz Gustavo M. Kanasiro, Francisco Amaro, João Luiz Artificial sphincter “BR - SL - AS 904” in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: efficacy, practicality and safety in a prospective and multicenter study |
title | Artificial sphincter “BR - SL - AS 904” in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: efficacy, practicality and safety in a prospective and multicenter study |
title_full | Artificial sphincter “BR - SL - AS 904” in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: efficacy, practicality and safety in a prospective and multicenter study |
title_fullStr | Artificial sphincter “BR - SL - AS 904” in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: efficacy, practicality and safety in a prospective and multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial sphincter “BR - SL - AS 904” in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: efficacy, practicality and safety in a prospective and multicenter study |
title_short | Artificial sphincter “BR - SL - AS 904” in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: efficacy, practicality and safety in a prospective and multicenter study |
title_sort | artificial sphincter “br - sl - as 904” in the treatment of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: efficacy, practicality and safety in a prospective and multicenter study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30325613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0128 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limasalvadorvilarcorreia artificialsphincterbrslas904inthetreatmentofurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomyefficacypracticalityandsafetyinaprospectiveandmulticenterstudy AT debarrosevandilsonguenescampos artificialsphincterbrslas904inthetreatmentofurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomyefficacypracticalityandsafetyinaprospectiveandmulticenterstudy AT vilarfabiodeoliveira artificialsphincterbrslas904inthetreatmentofurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomyefficacypracticalityandsafetyinaprospectiveandmulticenterstudy AT pintoflaviacristinamorone artificialsphincterbrslas904inthetreatmentofurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomyefficacypracticalityandsafetyinaprospectiveandmulticenterstudy AT barrosthomedeciopinheiro artificialsphincterbrslas904inthetreatmentofurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomyefficacypracticalityandsafetyinaprospectiveandmulticenterstudy AT truzzijosecarlos artificialsphincterbrslas904inthetreatmentofurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomyefficacypracticalityandsafetyinaprospectiveandmulticenterstudy AT detoledoluizgustavom artificialsphincterbrslas904inthetreatmentofurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomyefficacypracticalityandsafetyinaprospectiveandmulticenterstudy AT kanasirofrancisco artificialsphincterbrslas904inthetreatmentofurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomyefficacypracticalityandsafetyinaprospectiveandmulticenterstudy AT amarojoaoluiz artificialsphincterbrslas904inthetreatmentofurinaryincontinenceafterradicalprostatectomyefficacypracticalityandsafetyinaprospectiveandmulticenterstudy |