Cargando…

Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents

PURPOSE: To investigate a method to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents, given that the stent length may lead to exacerbation of urinary symptoms if the stent crosses the bladder midline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the position of the distal curl of the ureter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taguchi, Makoto, Yoshida, Kenji, Sugi, Motohiko, Kinoshita, Hidefumi, Matsuda, Tadashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30516929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0620
_version_ 1783407667250724864
author Taguchi, Makoto
Yoshida, Kenji
Sugi, Motohiko
Kinoshita, Hidefumi
Matsuda, Tadashi
author_facet Taguchi, Makoto
Yoshida, Kenji
Sugi, Motohiko
Kinoshita, Hidefumi
Matsuda, Tadashi
author_sort Taguchi, Makoto
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate a method to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents, given that the stent length may lead to exacerbation of urinary symptoms if the stent crosses the bladder midline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the position of the distal curl of the ureteral stent using kidney/ureter/bladder (KUB) radiographs after ureteroscopic lithotripsy in 165 patients who underwent placement of 24- or 26-cm ureteral stents. According to the KUB findings, we categorized the position of the distal curl of the ureteral stent into two groups. In Group 1, the stents did not cross the midline (appropriate length); in Group 2, the stents crossed the midline (inappropriate length). We assessed several patient parameters (sex, height, body mass index, and stone side) and the index of ureteral length using KUB radiographs (“C-P”) and computed tomography (CT, “P-V”). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the most significant factors affecting the position of ureteral stents. We also calculated the cutoff points of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of C-P and P-V for the position of ureteral stents. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis showed that C-P was the most significant factor affecting the position of ureteral stents (p < 0.001) in patients with 24- and 26-cm ureteral stents. Comparison of the ROC curves of C-P and P-V showed that C-P was superior to P-V (p < 0.01) in patients with 24- and 26-cm stents. CONCLUSION: The use of KUB radiographs was effective and simple in determining the appropriate length of ureteral stents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6442190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64421902019-04-05 Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents Taguchi, Makoto Yoshida, Kenji Sugi, Motohiko Kinoshita, Hidefumi Matsuda, Tadashi Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate a method to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents, given that the stent length may lead to exacerbation of urinary symptoms if the stent crosses the bladder midline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the position of the distal curl of the ureteral stent using kidney/ureter/bladder (KUB) radiographs after ureteroscopic lithotripsy in 165 patients who underwent placement of 24- or 26-cm ureteral stents. According to the KUB findings, we categorized the position of the distal curl of the ureteral stent into two groups. In Group 1, the stents did not cross the midline (appropriate length); in Group 2, the stents crossed the midline (inappropriate length). We assessed several patient parameters (sex, height, body mass index, and stone side) and the index of ureteral length using KUB radiographs (“C-P”) and computed tomography (CT, “P-V”). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the most significant factors affecting the position of ureteral stents. We also calculated the cutoff points of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of C-P and P-V for the position of ureteral stents. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis showed that C-P was the most significant factor affecting the position of ureteral stents (p < 0.001) in patients with 24- and 26-cm ureteral stents. Comparison of the ROC curves of C-P and P-V showed that C-P was superior to P-V (p < 0.01) in patients with 24- and 26-cm stents. CONCLUSION: The use of KUB radiographs was effective and simple in determining the appropriate length of ureteral stents. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6442190/ /pubmed/30516929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0620 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Taguchi, Makoto
Yoshida, Kenji
Sugi, Motohiko
Kinoshita, Hidefumi
Matsuda, Tadashi
Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents
title Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents
title_full Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents
title_fullStr Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents
title_full_unstemmed Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents
title_short Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents
title_sort simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30516929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0620
work_keys_str_mv AT taguchimakoto simplifiedmethodusingkidneyureterbladderxraytodeterminetheappropriatelengthofureteralstents
AT yoshidakenji simplifiedmethodusingkidneyureterbladderxraytodeterminetheappropriatelengthofureteralstents
AT sugimotohiko simplifiedmethodusingkidneyureterbladderxraytodeterminetheappropriatelengthofureteralstents
AT kinoshitahidefumi simplifiedmethodusingkidneyureterbladderxraytodeterminetheappropriatelengthofureteralstents
AT matsudatadashi simplifiedmethodusingkidneyureterbladderxraytodeterminetheappropriatelengthofureteralstents