Cargando…
Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents
PURPOSE: To investigate a method to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents, given that the stent length may lead to exacerbation of urinary symptoms if the stent crosses the bladder midline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the position of the distal curl of the ureter...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30516929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0620 |
_version_ | 1783407667250724864 |
---|---|
author | Taguchi, Makoto Yoshida, Kenji Sugi, Motohiko Kinoshita, Hidefumi Matsuda, Tadashi |
author_facet | Taguchi, Makoto Yoshida, Kenji Sugi, Motohiko Kinoshita, Hidefumi Matsuda, Tadashi |
author_sort | Taguchi, Makoto |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To investigate a method to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents, given that the stent length may lead to exacerbation of urinary symptoms if the stent crosses the bladder midline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the position of the distal curl of the ureteral stent using kidney/ureter/bladder (KUB) radiographs after ureteroscopic lithotripsy in 165 patients who underwent placement of 24- or 26-cm ureteral stents. According to the KUB findings, we categorized the position of the distal curl of the ureteral stent into two groups. In Group 1, the stents did not cross the midline (appropriate length); in Group 2, the stents crossed the midline (inappropriate length). We assessed several patient parameters (sex, height, body mass index, and stone side) and the index of ureteral length using KUB radiographs (“C-P”) and computed tomography (CT, “P-V”). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the most significant factors affecting the position of ureteral stents. We also calculated the cutoff points of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of C-P and P-V for the position of ureteral stents. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis showed that C-P was the most significant factor affecting the position of ureteral stents (p < 0.001) in patients with 24- and 26-cm ureteral stents. Comparison of the ROC curves of C-P and P-V showed that C-P was superior to P-V (p < 0.01) in patients with 24- and 26-cm stents. CONCLUSION: The use of KUB radiographs was effective and simple in determining the appropriate length of ureteral stents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6442190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64421902019-04-05 Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents Taguchi, Makoto Yoshida, Kenji Sugi, Motohiko Kinoshita, Hidefumi Matsuda, Tadashi Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To investigate a method to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents, given that the stent length may lead to exacerbation of urinary symptoms if the stent crosses the bladder midline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the position of the distal curl of the ureteral stent using kidney/ureter/bladder (KUB) radiographs after ureteroscopic lithotripsy in 165 patients who underwent placement of 24- or 26-cm ureteral stents. According to the KUB findings, we categorized the position of the distal curl of the ureteral stent into two groups. In Group 1, the stents did not cross the midline (appropriate length); in Group 2, the stents crossed the midline (inappropriate length). We assessed several patient parameters (sex, height, body mass index, and stone side) and the index of ureteral length using KUB radiographs (“C-P”) and computed tomography (CT, “P-V”). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the most significant factors affecting the position of ureteral stents. We also calculated the cutoff points of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of C-P and P-V for the position of ureteral stents. RESULTS: The multivariate analysis showed that C-P was the most significant factor affecting the position of ureteral stents (p < 0.001) in patients with 24- and 26-cm ureteral stents. Comparison of the ROC curves of C-P and P-V showed that C-P was superior to P-V (p < 0.01) in patients with 24- and 26-cm stents. CONCLUSION: The use of KUB radiographs was effective and simple in determining the appropriate length of ureteral stents. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6442190/ /pubmed/30516929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0620 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Taguchi, Makoto Yoshida, Kenji Sugi, Motohiko Kinoshita, Hidefumi Matsuda, Tadashi Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents |
title | Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents |
title_full | Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents |
title_fullStr | Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents |
title_full_unstemmed | Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents |
title_short | Simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents |
title_sort | simplified method using kidney / ureter / bladder x-ray to determine the appropriate length of ureteral stents |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30516929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0620 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taguchimakoto simplifiedmethodusingkidneyureterbladderxraytodeterminetheappropriatelengthofureteralstents AT yoshidakenji simplifiedmethodusingkidneyureterbladderxraytodeterminetheappropriatelengthofureteralstents AT sugimotohiko simplifiedmethodusingkidneyureterbladderxraytodeterminetheappropriatelengthofureteralstents AT kinoshitahidefumi simplifiedmethodusingkidneyureterbladderxraytodeterminetheappropriatelengthofureteralstents AT matsudatadashi simplifiedmethodusingkidneyureterbladderxraytodeterminetheappropriatelengthofureteralstents |