Cargando…

Validation of the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire in an Australian general practice cohort: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is spirometry, but there are barriers to its use in primary care. AIMS: To externally validate the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ) as a diagnostic tool in patients at increased risk in Australian gene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stanley, Anthony J, Hasan, Iqbal, Crockett, Alan J, van Schayck, Onno CP, Zwar, Nicholas A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24570082
http://dx.doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00015
_version_ 1783407686300205056
author Stanley, Anthony J
Hasan, Iqbal
Crockett, Alan J
van Schayck, Onno CP
Zwar, Nicholas A
author_facet Stanley, Anthony J
Hasan, Iqbal
Crockett, Alan J
van Schayck, Onno CP
Zwar, Nicholas A
author_sort Stanley, Anthony J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The gold standard for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is spirometry, but there are barriers to its use in primary care. AIMS: To externally validate the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ) as a diagnostic tool in patients at increased risk in Australian general practice and to compare its performance with other CDQ validation studies. METHODS: Patients were recruited from 36 general practices in Sydney, Australia. Former or current smokers aged 40–85 years with no prior COPD diagnosis were invited to a case-finding appointment with the practice nurse. The CDQ was collected and pre- and postbronchodilator spirometry was performed. Cases for whom complete CDQ data were present and the spirometry met quality standards were analysed. RESULTS: Of 1,631 patients who attended case-finding recruitment, 1,054 (65%) could be analysed. Spirometry showed 13% had COPD. The ability of the CDQ to discriminate between patients with and without COPD was fair, represented by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.713. With a CDQ cut-off point value of 16.5 the sensitivity was 80% and specificity 47% and, at a cut-off point value of 19.5, the sensitivity was 63% and specificity 70%. CONCLUSIONS: The CDQ did not discriminate between patients with and without COPD accurately enough to use as a diagnostic tool in patients at increased risk of COPD in Australian general practice. Further research is needed on the value of the CDQ as a tool for selecting patients for spirometry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6442288
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64422882019-07-01 Validation of the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire in an Australian general practice cohort: a cross-sectional study Stanley, Anthony J Hasan, Iqbal Crockett, Alan J van Schayck, Onno CP Zwar, Nicholas A Prim Care Respir J Research Paper BACKGROUND: The gold standard for the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is spirometry, but there are barriers to its use in primary care. AIMS: To externally validate the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire (CDQ) as a diagnostic tool in patients at increased risk in Australian general practice and to compare its performance with other CDQ validation studies. METHODS: Patients were recruited from 36 general practices in Sydney, Australia. Former or current smokers aged 40–85 years with no prior COPD diagnosis were invited to a case-finding appointment with the practice nurse. The CDQ was collected and pre- and postbronchodilator spirometry was performed. Cases for whom complete CDQ data were present and the spirometry met quality standards were analysed. RESULTS: Of 1,631 patients who attended case-finding recruitment, 1,054 (65%) could be analysed. Spirometry showed 13% had COPD. The ability of the CDQ to discriminate between patients with and without COPD was fair, represented by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.713. With a CDQ cut-off point value of 16.5 the sensitivity was 80% and specificity 47% and, at a cut-off point value of 19.5, the sensitivity was 63% and specificity 70%. CONCLUSIONS: The CDQ did not discriminate between patients with and without COPD accurately enough to use as a diagnostic tool in patients at increased risk of COPD in Australian general practice. Further research is needed on the value of the CDQ as a tool for selecting patients for spirometry. Nature Publishing Group 2014-03 2014-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6442288/ /pubmed/24570082 http://dx.doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00015 Text en Copyright © 2014 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK
spellingShingle Research Paper
Stanley, Anthony J
Hasan, Iqbal
Crockett, Alan J
van Schayck, Onno CP
Zwar, Nicholas A
Validation of the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire in an Australian general practice cohort: a cross-sectional study
title Validation of the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire in an Australian general practice cohort: a cross-sectional study
title_full Validation of the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire in an Australian general practice cohort: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Validation of the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire in an Australian general practice cohort: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire in an Australian general practice cohort: a cross-sectional study
title_short Validation of the COPD Diagnostic Questionnaire in an Australian general practice cohort: a cross-sectional study
title_sort validation of the copd diagnostic questionnaire in an australian general practice cohort: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442288/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24570082
http://dx.doi.org/10.4104/pcrj.2014.00015
work_keys_str_mv AT stanleyanthonyj validationofthecopddiagnosticquestionnaireinanaustraliangeneralpracticecohortacrosssectionalstudy
AT hasaniqbal validationofthecopddiagnosticquestionnaireinanaustraliangeneralpracticecohortacrosssectionalstudy
AT crockettalanj validationofthecopddiagnosticquestionnaireinanaustraliangeneralpracticecohortacrosssectionalstudy
AT vanschayckonnocp validationofthecopddiagnosticquestionnaireinanaustraliangeneralpracticecohortacrosssectionalstudy
AT zwarnicholasa validationofthecopddiagnosticquestionnaireinanaustraliangeneralpracticecohortacrosssectionalstudy