Cargando…

Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients

PURPOSE: To analyze and compare corneal structural and biomechanical properties, characterized by corneal hysteresis (CH) and resistance factor (CRF), between patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and determine the main ocular variables that influence them. METHODS: Sixty diabetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beato, João N., Esteves-Leandro, João, Reis, David, Falcão, Manuel, Rosas, Vítor, Carneiro, Ângela, Falcão Reis, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3764878
_version_ 1783407694924742656
author Beato, João N.
Esteves-Leandro, João
Reis, David
Falcão, Manuel
Rosas, Vítor
Carneiro, Ângela
Falcão Reis, Fernando
author_facet Beato, João N.
Esteves-Leandro, João
Reis, David
Falcão, Manuel
Rosas, Vítor
Carneiro, Ângela
Falcão Reis, Fernando
author_sort Beato, João N.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To analyze and compare corneal structural and biomechanical properties, characterized by corneal hysteresis (CH) and resistance factor (CRF), between patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and determine the main ocular variables that influence them. METHODS: Sixty diabetic and 48 age- and sex-matched non-DM patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The DM group was analyzed according to DM duration (<or ≥ 10 years), HbA1c levels (<or ≥ 7%), and presence of retinopathy. CH and CRF were evaluated using the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA). Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined by Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam® HR). Intraocular pressure was obtained with ORA (IOPcc) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP-GAT). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between demographical, clinical, and ocular variables with the biomechanical properties. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the CH and the CRF between DM and non-DM groups (p=0.637 and p=0.439, respectively). Also, there was no statistical difference between groups for the CCT, IOPcc, or IOP-GAT. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that CH was positively associated with CCT (p < 0.001) and negatively associated with IOPcc (p < 0.001), while CRF was positively associated with CCT (p < 0.001) and IOPcc (p=0.014). CONCLUSION: The CCT and IOPcc were found to be the main parameters that affect corneal biomechanical properties both in diabetics and controls. In this study, there was no significant effect of DM type 2 on corneal biomechanics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6442329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64423292019-04-22 Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients Beato, João N. Esteves-Leandro, João Reis, David Falcão, Manuel Rosas, Vítor Carneiro, Ângela Falcão Reis, Fernando J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To analyze and compare corneal structural and biomechanical properties, characterized by corneal hysteresis (CH) and resistance factor (CRF), between patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and determine the main ocular variables that influence them. METHODS: Sixty diabetic and 48 age- and sex-matched non-DM patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The DM group was analyzed according to DM duration (<or ≥ 10 years), HbA1c levels (<or ≥ 7%), and presence of retinopathy. CH and CRF were evaluated using the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA). Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined by Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam® HR). Intraocular pressure was obtained with ORA (IOPcc) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP-GAT). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between demographical, clinical, and ocular variables with the biomechanical properties. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the CH and the CRF between DM and non-DM groups (p=0.637 and p=0.439, respectively). Also, there was no statistical difference between groups for the CCT, IOPcc, or IOP-GAT. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that CH was positively associated with CCT (p < 0.001) and negatively associated with IOPcc (p < 0.001), while CRF was positively associated with CCT (p < 0.001) and IOPcc (p=0.014). CONCLUSION: The CCT and IOPcc were found to be the main parameters that affect corneal biomechanical properties both in diabetics and controls. In this study, there was no significant effect of DM type 2 on corneal biomechanics. Hindawi 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6442329/ /pubmed/31011451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3764878 Text en Copyright © 2019 João N. Beato et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Beato, João N.
Esteves-Leandro, João
Reis, David
Falcão, Manuel
Rosas, Vítor
Carneiro, Ângela
Falcão Reis, Fernando
Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients
title Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients
title_full Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients
title_fullStr Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients
title_full_unstemmed Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients
title_short Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients
title_sort structural and biomechanical corneal differences between type 2 diabetic and nondiabetic patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3764878
work_keys_str_mv AT beatojoaon structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients
AT estevesleandrojoao structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients
AT reisdavid structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients
AT falcaomanuel structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients
AT rosasvitor structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients
AT carneiroangela structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients
AT falcaoreisfernando structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients