Cargando…
Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients
PURPOSE: To analyze and compare corneal structural and biomechanical properties, characterized by corneal hysteresis (CH) and resistance factor (CRF), between patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and determine the main ocular variables that influence them. METHODS: Sixty diabetic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3764878 |
_version_ | 1783407694924742656 |
---|---|
author | Beato, João N. Esteves-Leandro, João Reis, David Falcão, Manuel Rosas, Vítor Carneiro, Ângela Falcão Reis, Fernando |
author_facet | Beato, João N. Esteves-Leandro, João Reis, David Falcão, Manuel Rosas, Vítor Carneiro, Ângela Falcão Reis, Fernando |
author_sort | Beato, João N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To analyze and compare corneal structural and biomechanical properties, characterized by corneal hysteresis (CH) and resistance factor (CRF), between patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and determine the main ocular variables that influence them. METHODS: Sixty diabetic and 48 age- and sex-matched non-DM patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The DM group was analyzed according to DM duration (<or ≥ 10 years), HbA1c levels (<or ≥ 7%), and presence of retinopathy. CH and CRF were evaluated using the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA). Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined by Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam® HR). Intraocular pressure was obtained with ORA (IOPcc) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP-GAT). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between demographical, clinical, and ocular variables with the biomechanical properties. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the CH and the CRF between DM and non-DM groups (p=0.637 and p=0.439, respectively). Also, there was no statistical difference between groups for the CCT, IOPcc, or IOP-GAT. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that CH was positively associated with CCT (p < 0.001) and negatively associated with IOPcc (p < 0.001), while CRF was positively associated with CCT (p < 0.001) and IOPcc (p=0.014). CONCLUSION: The CCT and IOPcc were found to be the main parameters that affect corneal biomechanical properties both in diabetics and controls. In this study, there was no significant effect of DM type 2 on corneal biomechanics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6442329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64423292019-04-22 Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients Beato, João N. Esteves-Leandro, João Reis, David Falcão, Manuel Rosas, Vítor Carneiro, Ângela Falcão Reis, Fernando J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To analyze and compare corneal structural and biomechanical properties, characterized by corneal hysteresis (CH) and resistance factor (CRF), between patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and determine the main ocular variables that influence them. METHODS: Sixty diabetic and 48 age- and sex-matched non-DM patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The DM group was analyzed according to DM duration (<or ≥ 10 years), HbA1c levels (<or ≥ 7%), and presence of retinopathy. CH and CRF were evaluated using the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA). Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined by Scheimpflug tomography (Pentacam® HR). Intraocular pressure was obtained with ORA (IOPcc) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP-GAT). Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between demographical, clinical, and ocular variables with the biomechanical properties. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the CH and the CRF between DM and non-DM groups (p=0.637 and p=0.439, respectively). Also, there was no statistical difference between groups for the CCT, IOPcc, or IOP-GAT. Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that CH was positively associated with CCT (p < 0.001) and negatively associated with IOPcc (p < 0.001), while CRF was positively associated with CCT (p < 0.001) and IOPcc (p=0.014). CONCLUSION: The CCT and IOPcc were found to be the main parameters that affect corneal biomechanical properties both in diabetics and controls. In this study, there was no significant effect of DM type 2 on corneal biomechanics. Hindawi 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6442329/ /pubmed/31011451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3764878 Text en Copyright © 2019 João N. Beato et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Beato, João N. Esteves-Leandro, João Reis, David Falcão, Manuel Rosas, Vítor Carneiro, Ângela Falcão Reis, Fernando Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients |
title | Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients |
title_full | Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients |
title_fullStr | Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients |
title_short | Structural and Biomechanical Corneal Differences between Type 2 Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients |
title_sort | structural and biomechanical corneal differences between type 2 diabetic and nondiabetic patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3764878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beatojoaon structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients AT estevesleandrojoao structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients AT reisdavid structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients AT falcaomanuel structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients AT rosasvitor structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients AT carneiroangela structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients AT falcaoreisfernando structuralandbiomechanicalcornealdifferencesbetweentype2diabeticandnondiabeticpatients |