Cargando…

Tracking of enzymatic biomass deconstruction by fungal secretomes highlights markers of lignocellulose recalcitrance

BACKGROUND: Lignocellulose biomass is known as a recalcitrant material towards enzymatic hydrolysis, increasing the process cost in biorefinery. In nature, filamentous fungi naturally degrade lignocellulose, using an arsenal of hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes. Assessment of enzyme hydrolysis effici...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paës, Gabriel, Navarro, David, Benoit, Yves, Blanquet, Senta, Chabbert, Brigitte, Chaussepied, Bernard, Coutinho, Pedro M., Durand, Sylvie, Grigoriev, Igor V., Haon, Mireille, Heux, Laurent, Launay, Charlène, Margeot, Antoine, Nishiyama, Yoshiharu, Raouche, Sana, Rosso, Marie-Noëlle, Bonnin, Estelle, Berrin, Jean-Guy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1417-8
_version_ 1783407703062740992
author Paës, Gabriel
Navarro, David
Benoit, Yves
Blanquet, Senta
Chabbert, Brigitte
Chaussepied, Bernard
Coutinho, Pedro M.
Durand, Sylvie
Grigoriev, Igor V.
Haon, Mireille
Heux, Laurent
Launay, Charlène
Margeot, Antoine
Nishiyama, Yoshiharu
Raouche, Sana
Rosso, Marie-Noëlle
Bonnin, Estelle
Berrin, Jean-Guy
author_facet Paës, Gabriel
Navarro, David
Benoit, Yves
Blanquet, Senta
Chabbert, Brigitte
Chaussepied, Bernard
Coutinho, Pedro M.
Durand, Sylvie
Grigoriev, Igor V.
Haon, Mireille
Heux, Laurent
Launay, Charlène
Margeot, Antoine
Nishiyama, Yoshiharu
Raouche, Sana
Rosso, Marie-Noëlle
Bonnin, Estelle
Berrin, Jean-Guy
author_sort Paës, Gabriel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lignocellulose biomass is known as a recalcitrant material towards enzymatic hydrolysis, increasing the process cost in biorefinery. In nature, filamentous fungi naturally degrade lignocellulose, using an arsenal of hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes. Assessment of enzyme hydrolysis efficiency generally relies on the yield of glucose for a given biomass. To better understand the markers governing recalcitrance to enzymatic degradation, there is a need to enlarge the set of parameters followed during deconstruction. RESULTS: Industrially-pretreated biomass feedstocks from wheat straw, miscanthus and poplar were sequentially hydrolysed following two steps. First, standard secretome from Trichoderma reesei was used to maximize cellulose hydrolysis, producing three recalcitrant lignin-enriched solid substrates. Then fungal secretomes from three basidiomycete saprotrophs (Laetisaria arvalis, Artolenzites elegans and Trametes ljubarskyi) displaying various hydrolytic and oxidative enzymatic profiles were applied to these recalcitrant substrates, and compared to the T. reesei secretome. As a result, most of the glucose was released after the first hydrolysis step. After the second hydrolysis step, half of the remaining glucose amount was released. Overall, glucose yield after the two sequential hydrolyses was more dependent on the biomass source than on the fungal secretomes enzymatic profile. Solid residues obtained after the two hydrolysis steps were characterized using complementary methodologies. Correlation analysis of several physico-chemical parameters showed that released glucose yield was negatively correlated with lignin content and cellulose crystallinity while positively correlated with xylose content and water sorption. Water sorption appears as a pivotal marker of the recalcitrance as it reflects chemical and structural properties of lignocellulosic biomass. CONCLUSIONS: Fungal secretomes applied to highly recalcitrant biomass samples can further extend the release of the remaining glucose. The glucose yield can be correlated to chemical and physical markers, which appear to be independent from the biomass type and secretome. Overall, correlations between these markers reveal how nano-scale properties (polymer content and organization) influence macro-scale properties (particle size and water sorption). Further systematic assessment of these markers during enzymatic degradation will foster the development of novel cocktails to unlock the degradation of lignocellulose biomass. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13068-019-1417-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6442405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64424052019-04-11 Tracking of enzymatic biomass deconstruction by fungal secretomes highlights markers of lignocellulose recalcitrance Paës, Gabriel Navarro, David Benoit, Yves Blanquet, Senta Chabbert, Brigitte Chaussepied, Bernard Coutinho, Pedro M. Durand, Sylvie Grigoriev, Igor V. Haon, Mireille Heux, Laurent Launay, Charlène Margeot, Antoine Nishiyama, Yoshiharu Raouche, Sana Rosso, Marie-Noëlle Bonnin, Estelle Berrin, Jean-Guy Biotechnol Biofuels Research BACKGROUND: Lignocellulose biomass is known as a recalcitrant material towards enzymatic hydrolysis, increasing the process cost in biorefinery. In nature, filamentous fungi naturally degrade lignocellulose, using an arsenal of hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes. Assessment of enzyme hydrolysis efficiency generally relies on the yield of glucose for a given biomass. To better understand the markers governing recalcitrance to enzymatic degradation, there is a need to enlarge the set of parameters followed during deconstruction. RESULTS: Industrially-pretreated biomass feedstocks from wheat straw, miscanthus and poplar were sequentially hydrolysed following two steps. First, standard secretome from Trichoderma reesei was used to maximize cellulose hydrolysis, producing three recalcitrant lignin-enriched solid substrates. Then fungal secretomes from three basidiomycete saprotrophs (Laetisaria arvalis, Artolenzites elegans and Trametes ljubarskyi) displaying various hydrolytic and oxidative enzymatic profiles were applied to these recalcitrant substrates, and compared to the T. reesei secretome. As a result, most of the glucose was released after the first hydrolysis step. After the second hydrolysis step, half of the remaining glucose amount was released. Overall, glucose yield after the two sequential hydrolyses was more dependent on the biomass source than on the fungal secretomes enzymatic profile. Solid residues obtained after the two hydrolysis steps were characterized using complementary methodologies. Correlation analysis of several physico-chemical parameters showed that released glucose yield was negatively correlated with lignin content and cellulose crystallinity while positively correlated with xylose content and water sorption. Water sorption appears as a pivotal marker of the recalcitrance as it reflects chemical and structural properties of lignocellulosic biomass. CONCLUSIONS: Fungal secretomes applied to highly recalcitrant biomass samples can further extend the release of the remaining glucose. The glucose yield can be correlated to chemical and physical markers, which appear to be independent from the biomass type and secretome. Overall, correlations between these markers reveal how nano-scale properties (polymer content and organization) influence macro-scale properties (particle size and water sorption). Further systematic assessment of these markers during enzymatic degradation will foster the development of novel cocktails to unlock the degradation of lignocellulose biomass. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13068-019-1417-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6442405/ /pubmed/30976326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1417-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Paës, Gabriel
Navarro, David
Benoit, Yves
Blanquet, Senta
Chabbert, Brigitte
Chaussepied, Bernard
Coutinho, Pedro M.
Durand, Sylvie
Grigoriev, Igor V.
Haon, Mireille
Heux, Laurent
Launay, Charlène
Margeot, Antoine
Nishiyama, Yoshiharu
Raouche, Sana
Rosso, Marie-Noëlle
Bonnin, Estelle
Berrin, Jean-Guy
Tracking of enzymatic biomass deconstruction by fungal secretomes highlights markers of lignocellulose recalcitrance
title Tracking of enzymatic biomass deconstruction by fungal secretomes highlights markers of lignocellulose recalcitrance
title_full Tracking of enzymatic biomass deconstruction by fungal secretomes highlights markers of lignocellulose recalcitrance
title_fullStr Tracking of enzymatic biomass deconstruction by fungal secretomes highlights markers of lignocellulose recalcitrance
title_full_unstemmed Tracking of enzymatic biomass deconstruction by fungal secretomes highlights markers of lignocellulose recalcitrance
title_short Tracking of enzymatic biomass deconstruction by fungal secretomes highlights markers of lignocellulose recalcitrance
title_sort tracking of enzymatic biomass deconstruction by fungal secretomes highlights markers of lignocellulose recalcitrance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-019-1417-8
work_keys_str_mv AT paesgabriel trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT navarrodavid trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT benoityves trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT blanquetsenta trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT chabbertbrigitte trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT chaussepiedbernard trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT coutinhopedrom trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT durandsylvie trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT grigorievigorv trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT haonmireille trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT heuxlaurent trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT launaycharlene trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT margeotantoine trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT nishiyamayoshiharu trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT raouchesana trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT rossomarienoelle trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT bonninestelle trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance
AT berrinjeanguy trackingofenzymaticbiomassdeconstructionbyfungalsecretomeshighlightsmarkersoflignocelluloserecalcitrance