Cargando…

On a two-truths phenomenon in spectral graph clustering

Clustering is concerned with coherently grouping observations without any explicit concept of true groupings. Spectral graph clustering—clustering the vertices of a graph based on their spectral embedding—is commonly approached via K-means (or, more generally, Gaussian mixture model) clustering comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Priebe, Carey E., Park, Youngser, Vogelstein, Joshua T., Conroy, John M., Lyzinski, Vince, Tang, Minh, Athreya, Avanti, Cape, Joshua, Bridgeford, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30850525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814462116
Descripción
Sumario:Clustering is concerned with coherently grouping observations without any explicit concept of true groupings. Spectral graph clustering—clustering the vertices of a graph based on their spectral embedding—is commonly approached via K-means (or, more generally, Gaussian mixture model) clustering composed with either Laplacian spectral embedding (LSE) or adjacency spectral embedding (ASE). Recent theoretical results provide deeper understanding of the problem and solutions and lead us to a “two-truths” LSE vs. ASE spectral graph clustering phenomenon convincingly illustrated here via a diffusion MRI connectome dataset: The different embedding methods yield different clustering results, with LSE capturing left hemisphere/right hemisphere affinity structure and ASE capturing gray matter/white matter core–periphery structure.