Cargando…

New insight into antiphospholipid syndrome: antibodies to β2glycoprotein I-domain 5 fail to induce thrombi in rats

Clinical studies have reported different diagnostic/predictive values of antibodies to domain 1 or 4/5 of β(2)glycoproteinI in terms of risk of thrombosis and pregnancy complications in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. To obtain direct evidence for the pathogenic role of anti-domain 1 or ant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Durigutto, Paolo, Grossi, Claudia, Borghi, Maria Orietta, Macor, Paolo, Pregnolato, Francesca, Raschi, Elena, Myers, Michael P., de Groot, Philip G., Meroni, Pier Luigi, Tedesco, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ferrata Storti Foundation 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.198119
Descripción
Sumario:Clinical studies have reported different diagnostic/predictive values of antibodies to domain 1 or 4/5 of β(2)glycoproteinI in terms of risk of thrombosis and pregnancy complications in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. To obtain direct evidence for the pathogenic role of anti-domain 1 or anti-domain 4/5 antibodies, we analyzed the in vivo pro-coagulant effect of two groups of 5 sera IgG each reacting selectively with domain 1 or domain 5 in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated rats. Antibody-induced thrombus formation in mesenteric vessels was followed by intravital microscopy, and vascular deposition of β(2)glycoproteinI, human IgG and C3 was analyzed by immunofluorescence. Five serum IgG with undetectable anti-β(2)glycoproteinI antibodies served as controls. All the anti-domain 1-positive IgG exhibited potent pro-coagulant activity while the anti-domain 5-positive and the negative control IgG failed to promote blood clot and vessel occlusion. A stronger granular deposit of IgG/C3 was found on the mesenteric endothelium of rats treated with anti-domain 1 antibodies, as opposed to a mild linear IgG staining and absence of C3 observed in rats receiving anti-domain 5 antibodies. Purified anti-domain 5 IgG, unlike anti-domain 1 IgG, did not recognize cardiolipin-bound β(2)glycoproteinI while being able to interact with fluid-phase β(2)glycoproteinI. These findings may explain the failure of anti-domain 5 antibodies to exhibit a thrombogenic effect in vivo, and the interaction of these antibodies with circulating β(2)glycoproteinI suggests their potential competitive role with the pro-coagulant activity of anti-domain 1 antibodies. These data aim at better defining “really at risk” patients for more appropriate treatments to avoid recurrences and disability.