Cargando…
Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study)
INTRODUCTION: There are several different interventions available to promote shared decision making (SDM); however, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of different approaches. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of patient-directed and physician-directed decision support strategies on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024906 |
_version_ | 1783407795154976768 |
---|---|
author | Mangla, Mahima Bedair, Hany Chang, Yuchiao Daggett, Susannah Dwyer, Maureen K Freiberg, Andrew A Mwangi, Sheila Talmo, Carl Vo, Ha Sepucha, Karen |
author_facet | Mangla, Mahima Bedair, Hany Chang, Yuchiao Daggett, Susannah Dwyer, Maureen K Freiberg, Andrew A Mwangi, Sheila Talmo, Carl Vo, Ha Sepucha, Karen |
author_sort | Mangla, Mahima |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There are several different interventions available to promote shared decision making (SDM); however, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of different approaches. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of patient-directed and physician-directed decision support strategies on the quality of treatment decisions for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). TRIAL DESIGN: A 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial. SETTING: One academic medical centre, one community hospital and one orthopaedic specialty hospital. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: The enrolment targets were 8 surgeons and 1120 patients diagnosed with hip or knee OA. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of two different decision aids (DAs) stratified by site. The DAs varied in length, content and the level of detail regarding treatment options. Both DAs were available by paper or online. Surgeons were randomly assigned to receive a report detailing patients’ goals and treatment preferences at the time of the visit or not. Eligible patients received their assigned DA before their visit and completed three surveys: before the visit (timepoint (T)1), 1-week postvisit (T2) and 6 months from either the visit date or surgery date for patients who underwent surgery (T3). Study staff and participating surgeons were not blinded, but the statistician conducting the analyses was blinded to the arms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE AND ANALYSIS: The primary study outcome was decision quality, the percentage of patients who were well informed and received their preferred treatment. Secondary outcomes included involvement in decision making, surgical rates, health outcomes, decision regret and satisfaction. A logistic regression model with the generalised estimating equations approach was used to compare rates of decision quality between the groups and account for the clustering of patients within providers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained through the institutional review board at the main site. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02729831; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6443066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64430662019-04-17 Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study) Mangla, Mahima Bedair, Hany Chang, Yuchiao Daggett, Susannah Dwyer, Maureen K Freiberg, Andrew A Mwangi, Sheila Talmo, Carl Vo, Ha Sepucha, Karen BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: There are several different interventions available to promote shared decision making (SDM); however, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of different approaches. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of patient-directed and physician-directed decision support strategies on the quality of treatment decisions for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). TRIAL DESIGN: A 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial. SETTING: One academic medical centre, one community hospital and one orthopaedic specialty hospital. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: The enrolment targets were 8 surgeons and 1120 patients diagnosed with hip or knee OA. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of two different decision aids (DAs) stratified by site. The DAs varied in length, content and the level of detail regarding treatment options. Both DAs were available by paper or online. Surgeons were randomly assigned to receive a report detailing patients’ goals and treatment preferences at the time of the visit or not. Eligible patients received their assigned DA before their visit and completed three surveys: before the visit (timepoint (T)1), 1-week postvisit (T2) and 6 months from either the visit date or surgery date for patients who underwent surgery (T3). Study staff and participating surgeons were not blinded, but the statistician conducting the analyses was blinded to the arms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE AND ANALYSIS: The primary study outcome was decision quality, the percentage of patients who were well informed and received their preferred treatment. Secondary outcomes included involvement in decision making, surgical rates, health outcomes, decision regret and satisfaction. A logistic regression model with the generalised estimating equations approach was used to compare rates of decision quality between the groups and account for the clustering of patients within providers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained through the institutional review board at the main site. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02729831; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6443066/ /pubmed/30804032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024906 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Patient-Centred Medicine Mangla, Mahima Bedair, Hany Chang, Yuchiao Daggett, Susannah Dwyer, Maureen K Freiberg, Andrew A Mwangi, Sheila Talmo, Carl Vo, Ha Sepucha, Karen Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study) |
title | Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study) |
title_full | Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study) |
title_fullStr | Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study) |
title_short | Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study) |
title_sort | protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (decide-oa study) |
topic | Patient-Centred Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manglamahima protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy AT bedairhany protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy AT changyuchiao protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy AT daggettsusannah protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy AT dwyermaureenk protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy AT freibergandrewa protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy AT mwangisheila protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy AT talmocarl protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy AT voha protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy AT sepuchakaren protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy |