Cargando…

Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study)

INTRODUCTION: There are several different interventions available to promote shared decision making (SDM); however, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of different approaches. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of patient-directed and physician-directed decision support strategies on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangla, Mahima, Bedair, Hany, Chang, Yuchiao, Daggett, Susannah, Dwyer, Maureen K, Freiberg, Andrew A, Mwangi, Sheila, Talmo, Carl, Vo, Ha, Sepucha, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024906
_version_ 1783407795154976768
author Mangla, Mahima
Bedair, Hany
Chang, Yuchiao
Daggett, Susannah
Dwyer, Maureen K
Freiberg, Andrew A
Mwangi, Sheila
Talmo, Carl
Vo, Ha
Sepucha, Karen
author_facet Mangla, Mahima
Bedair, Hany
Chang, Yuchiao
Daggett, Susannah
Dwyer, Maureen K
Freiberg, Andrew A
Mwangi, Sheila
Talmo, Carl
Vo, Ha
Sepucha, Karen
author_sort Mangla, Mahima
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There are several different interventions available to promote shared decision making (SDM); however, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of different approaches. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of patient-directed and physician-directed decision support strategies on the quality of treatment decisions for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). TRIAL DESIGN: A 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial. SETTING: One academic medical centre, one community hospital and one orthopaedic specialty hospital. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: The enrolment targets were 8 surgeons and 1120 patients diagnosed with hip or knee OA. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of two different decision aids (DAs) stratified by site. The DAs varied in length, content and the level of detail regarding treatment options. Both DAs were available by paper or online. Surgeons were randomly assigned to receive a report detailing patients’ goals and treatment preferences at the time of the visit or not. Eligible patients received their assigned DA before their visit and completed three surveys: before the visit (timepoint (T)1), 1-week postvisit (T2) and 6 months from either the visit date or surgery date for patients who underwent surgery (T3). Study staff and participating surgeons were not blinded, but the statistician conducting the analyses was blinded to the arms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE AND ANALYSIS: The primary study outcome was decision quality, the percentage of patients who were well informed and received their preferred treatment. Secondary outcomes included involvement in decision making, surgical rates, health outcomes, decision regret and satisfaction. A logistic regression model with the generalised estimating equations approach was used to compare rates of decision quality between the groups and account for the clustering of patients within providers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained through the institutional review board at the main site. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02729831; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6443066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64430662019-04-17 Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study) Mangla, Mahima Bedair, Hany Chang, Yuchiao Daggett, Susannah Dwyer, Maureen K Freiberg, Andrew A Mwangi, Sheila Talmo, Carl Vo, Ha Sepucha, Karen BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine INTRODUCTION: There are several different interventions available to promote shared decision making (SDM); however, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of different approaches. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of patient-directed and physician-directed decision support strategies on the quality of treatment decisions for hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). TRIAL DESIGN: A 2×2 factorial randomised controlled trial. SETTING: One academic medical centre, one community hospital and one orthopaedic specialty hospital. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: The enrolment targets were 8 surgeons and 1120 patients diagnosed with hip or knee OA. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of two different decision aids (DAs) stratified by site. The DAs varied in length, content and the level of detail regarding treatment options. Both DAs were available by paper or online. Surgeons were randomly assigned to receive a report detailing patients’ goals and treatment preferences at the time of the visit or not. Eligible patients received their assigned DA before their visit and completed three surveys: before the visit (timepoint (T)1), 1-week postvisit (T2) and 6 months from either the visit date or surgery date for patients who underwent surgery (T3). Study staff and participating surgeons were not blinded, but the statistician conducting the analyses was blinded to the arms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE AND ANALYSIS: The primary study outcome was decision quality, the percentage of patients who were well informed and received their preferred treatment. Secondary outcomes included involvement in decision making, surgical rates, health outcomes, decision regret and satisfaction. A logistic regression model with the generalised estimating equations approach was used to compare rates of decision quality between the groups and account for the clustering of patients within providers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained through the institutional review board at the main site. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02729831; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6443066/ /pubmed/30804032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024906 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Mangla, Mahima
Bedair, Hany
Chang, Yuchiao
Daggett, Susannah
Dwyer, Maureen K
Freiberg, Andrew A
Mwangi, Sheila
Talmo, Carl
Vo, Ha
Sepucha, Karen
Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study)
title Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study)
title_full Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study)
title_fullStr Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study)
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study)
title_short Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study)
title_sort protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (decide-oa study)
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024906
work_keys_str_mv AT manglamahima protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy
AT bedairhany protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy
AT changyuchiao protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy
AT daggettsusannah protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy
AT dwyermaureenk protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy
AT freibergandrewa protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy
AT mwangisheila protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy
AT talmocarl protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy
AT voha protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy
AT sepuchakaren protocolforarandomisedtrialevaluatingthecomparativeeffectivenessofstrategiestopromoteshareddecisionmakingforhipandkneeosteoarthritisdecideoastudy