Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracies of screening for atrial fibrillation by cardiac nurses versus radiographers

AIM: We examined the diagnostic accuracy of single-lead ECG as assessed by radiographers and 12-lead ECG as assessed by cardiac nurses for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Based on the Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial, we conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kvist, Lærke Marius, Vinter, Nicklas, Urbonaviciene, Grazina, Lindholt, Jes Sanddal, Diederichsen, Axel Cosmus Pyndt, Frost, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30997131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000942
_version_ 1783407803581333504
author Kvist, Lærke Marius
Vinter, Nicklas
Urbonaviciene, Grazina
Lindholt, Jes Sanddal
Diederichsen, Axel Cosmus Pyndt
Frost, Lars
author_facet Kvist, Lærke Marius
Vinter, Nicklas
Urbonaviciene, Grazina
Lindholt, Jes Sanddal
Diederichsen, Axel Cosmus Pyndt
Frost, Lars
author_sort Kvist, Lærke Marius
collection PubMed
description AIM: We examined the diagnostic accuracy of single-lead ECG as assessed by radiographers and 12-lead ECG as assessed by cardiac nurses for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Based on the Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial, we conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study of 1338 randomly selected Danish men aged 65–74 years with no exclusion criteria. The participants were screened with single-lead ECG during a CT scan assessed by radiographers and 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated compared with that produced by a 12-lead ECG assessed by two consenting cardiologists. RESULTS: The study identified 68 participants with ongoing AF, of whom 60 had self-reported AF and 8 had AF detected in the screening. Single-lead ECG assessed for AF by radiographers had a sensitivity of 60.3% (95% CI 47.7 to 72.0), specificity of 97.2% (95% CI 96.2 to 98.1), positive predictive value (PPV) of 53.9% (95% CI 42.1 to 65.5) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.9% (95% CI 96.9 to 98.6). 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses had a sensitivity of 97.1% (95% CI 89.8 to 99.6), specificity of 100% (95% CI 99.7 to 100), PPV of 100% (95% CI 94.6 to 100) and NPV of 99.8% (95% CI 99.4 to 100). CONCLUSIONS: Single-lead ECG assessed by radiographers had a moderate sensitivity and PPV but a very high specificity and NPV. Using radiographers may be acceptable for opportunistic screening, in particular if radiographers are thoroughly trained. Thus, 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses is a potential diagnostic method for the detection of AF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6443120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64431202019-04-17 Diagnostic accuracies of screening for atrial fibrillation by cardiac nurses versus radiographers Kvist, Lærke Marius Vinter, Nicklas Urbonaviciene, Grazina Lindholt, Jes Sanddal Diederichsen, Axel Cosmus Pyndt Frost, Lars Open Heart Cardiac Risk Factors and Prevention AIM: We examined the diagnostic accuracy of single-lead ECG as assessed by radiographers and 12-lead ECG as assessed by cardiac nurses for the diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Based on the Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial, we conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study of 1338 randomly selected Danish men aged 65–74 years with no exclusion criteria. The participants were screened with single-lead ECG during a CT scan assessed by radiographers and 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated compared with that produced by a 12-lead ECG assessed by two consenting cardiologists. RESULTS: The study identified 68 participants with ongoing AF, of whom 60 had self-reported AF and 8 had AF detected in the screening. Single-lead ECG assessed for AF by radiographers had a sensitivity of 60.3% (95% CI 47.7 to 72.0), specificity of 97.2% (95% CI 96.2 to 98.1), positive predictive value (PPV) of 53.9% (95% CI 42.1 to 65.5) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.9% (95% CI 96.9 to 98.6). 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses had a sensitivity of 97.1% (95% CI 89.8 to 99.6), specificity of 100% (95% CI 99.7 to 100), PPV of 100% (95% CI 94.6 to 100) and NPV of 99.8% (95% CI 99.4 to 100). CONCLUSIONS: Single-lead ECG assessed by radiographers had a moderate sensitivity and PPV but a very high specificity and NPV. Using radiographers may be acceptable for opportunistic screening, in particular if radiographers are thoroughly trained. Thus, 12-lead ECG assessed by cardiac nurses is a potential diagnostic method for the detection of AF. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6443120/ /pubmed/30997131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000942 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cardiac Risk Factors and Prevention
Kvist, Lærke Marius
Vinter, Nicklas
Urbonaviciene, Grazina
Lindholt, Jes Sanddal
Diederichsen, Axel Cosmus Pyndt
Frost, Lars
Diagnostic accuracies of screening for atrial fibrillation by cardiac nurses versus radiographers
title Diagnostic accuracies of screening for atrial fibrillation by cardiac nurses versus radiographers
title_full Diagnostic accuracies of screening for atrial fibrillation by cardiac nurses versus radiographers
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracies of screening for atrial fibrillation by cardiac nurses versus radiographers
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracies of screening for atrial fibrillation by cardiac nurses versus radiographers
title_short Diagnostic accuracies of screening for atrial fibrillation by cardiac nurses versus radiographers
title_sort diagnostic accuracies of screening for atrial fibrillation by cardiac nurses versus radiographers
topic Cardiac Risk Factors and Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30997131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000942
work_keys_str_mv AT kvistlærkemarius diagnosticaccuraciesofscreeningforatrialfibrillationbycardiacnursesversusradiographers
AT vinternicklas diagnosticaccuraciesofscreeningforatrialfibrillationbycardiacnursesversusradiographers
AT urbonavicienegrazina diagnosticaccuraciesofscreeningforatrialfibrillationbycardiacnursesversusradiographers
AT lindholtjessanddal diagnosticaccuraciesofscreeningforatrialfibrillationbycardiacnursesversusradiographers
AT diederichsenaxelcosmuspyndt diagnosticaccuraciesofscreeningforatrialfibrillationbycardiacnursesversusradiographers
AT frostlars diagnosticaccuraciesofscreeningforatrialfibrillationbycardiacnursesversusradiographers