Cargando…
The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older intensive care unit patients at discharge
OBJECTIVE: Assess the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test safety and clinimetric properties in older patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit. METHODS: Test safety was assessed according to the incidence of adverse events and through hemodynamic and respiratory data. Additionally, reliability proper...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira -
AMIB
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30892478 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20190006 |
_version_ | 1783407833143836672 |
---|---|
author | de Melo, Thiago Araújo Duarte, Antonio Carlos Magalhães Bezerra, Thaysa Samanta França, Fabrícia Soares, Neila Silva Brito, Debora |
author_facet | de Melo, Thiago Araújo Duarte, Antonio Carlos Magalhães Bezerra, Thaysa Samanta França, Fabrícia Soares, Neila Silva Brito, Debora |
author_sort | de Melo, Thiago Araújo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Assess the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test safety and clinimetric properties in older patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit. METHODS: Test safety was assessed according to the incidence of adverse events and through hemodynamic and respiratory data. Additionally, reliability properties were investigated using the intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, standard error percentage change, Altman-Bland plot and a survival agreement plot. RESULTS: The overall suitability of the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was found to be low, with 29.8% meeting the inclusion criteria. Only 44% of the hospitalized patients who met the inclusion criteria performed the test, with no need for discontinuation in any patient. Heart rate (79.7 ± 10.2bpm/86.6 ± 9.7bpm; p = 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (118 ± 21.4mmHg/129 ± 21.5mmHg; p = 0.031) were the only variables that presented a significant statistical increase, with no evidence of exacerbated response to the test. Additionally, no adverse events were reported from participating and both test-retest and interrater reliability were high (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.99). CONCLUSION: The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was proven to be safe and to have excellent reliability. Its clinical use, however, may be restricted to high-functioning older adults in hospital settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6443310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira -
AMIB |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64433102019-04-04 The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older intensive care unit patients at discharge de Melo, Thiago Araújo Duarte, Antonio Carlos Magalhães Bezerra, Thaysa Samanta França, Fabrícia Soares, Neila Silva Brito, Debora Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Assess the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test safety and clinimetric properties in older patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit. METHODS: Test safety was assessed according to the incidence of adverse events and through hemodynamic and respiratory data. Additionally, reliability properties were investigated using the intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of measurement, standard error percentage change, Altman-Bland plot and a survival agreement plot. RESULTS: The overall suitability of the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was found to be low, with 29.8% meeting the inclusion criteria. Only 44% of the hospitalized patients who met the inclusion criteria performed the test, with no need for discontinuation in any patient. Heart rate (79.7 ± 10.2bpm/86.6 ± 9.7bpm; p = 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (118 ± 21.4mmHg/129 ± 21.5mmHg; p = 0.031) were the only variables that presented a significant statistical increase, with no evidence of exacerbated response to the test. Additionally, no adverse events were reported from participating and both test-retest and interrater reliability were high (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.99). CONCLUSION: The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test was proven to be safe and to have excellent reliability. Its clinical use, however, may be restricted to high-functioning older adults in hospital settings. Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6443310/ /pubmed/30892478 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20190006 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles de Melo, Thiago Araújo Duarte, Antonio Carlos Magalhães Bezerra, Thaysa Samanta França, Fabrícia Soares, Neila Silva Brito, Debora The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older intensive care unit patients at discharge |
title | The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older
intensive care unit patients at discharge |
title_full | The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older
intensive care unit patients at discharge |
title_fullStr | The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older
intensive care unit patients at discharge |
title_full_unstemmed | The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older
intensive care unit patients at discharge |
title_short | The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older
intensive care unit patients at discharge |
title_sort | five times sit-to-stand test: safety and reliability with older
intensive care unit patients at discharge |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30892478 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20190006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demelothiagoaraujo thefivetimessittostandtestsafetyandreliabilitywitholderintensivecareunitpatientsatdischarge AT duarteantoniocarlosmagalhaes thefivetimessittostandtestsafetyandreliabilitywitholderintensivecareunitpatientsatdischarge AT bezerrathaysasamanta thefivetimessittostandtestsafetyandreliabilitywitholderintensivecareunitpatientsatdischarge AT francafabricia thefivetimessittostandtestsafetyandreliabilitywitholderintensivecareunitpatientsatdischarge AT soaresneilasilva thefivetimessittostandtestsafetyandreliabilitywitholderintensivecareunitpatientsatdischarge AT britodebora thefivetimessittostandtestsafetyandreliabilitywitholderintensivecareunitpatientsatdischarge AT demelothiagoaraujo fivetimessittostandtestsafetyandreliabilitywitholderintensivecareunitpatientsatdischarge AT duarteantoniocarlosmagalhaes fivetimessittostandtestsafetyandreliabilitywitholderintensivecareunitpatientsatdischarge AT bezerrathaysasamanta fivetimessittostandtestsafetyandreliabilitywitholderintensivecareunitpatientsatdischarge AT francafabricia fivetimessittostandtestsafetyandreliabilitywitholderintensivecareunitpatientsatdischarge AT soaresneilasilva fivetimessittostandtestsafetyandreliabilitywitholderintensivecareunitpatientsatdischarge AT britodebora fivetimessittostandtestsafetyandreliabilitywitholderintensivecareunitpatientsatdischarge |