Cargando…

Transrectal or transvaginal ultrasoundguided biopsy for pelvic masses: external validation and usefulness in oncologic patients

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to externally validate the diagnostic usefulness of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS)-guided biopsy for pelvic masses, and to analyze the diagnostic performance of these methods in oncologic patients. METHODS: A consecutive series...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Won, So Yeon, Kim, Hyun-Soo, Park, Sung Yoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30153726
http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.18028
_version_ 1783407860661616640
author Won, So Yeon
Kim, Hyun-Soo
Park, Sung Yoon
author_facet Won, So Yeon
Kim, Hyun-Soo
Park, Sung Yoon
author_sort Won, So Yeon
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to externally validate the diagnostic usefulness of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS)-guided biopsy for pelvic masses, and to analyze the diagnostic performance of these methods in oncologic patients. METHODS: A consecutive series of 30 patients who underwent TRUS- or TVUS-guided biopsy for pelvic masses was included. Tissue samples were obtained using an 18-gauge core biopsy needle under local anesthesia for lesions detected on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. We analyzed the rates of diagnostic biopsies upon pathologic examination and biopsy-related major complications requiring treatment. In diagnostic biopsy cases, the performance was also investigated for all patients and patients with underlying malignancy. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy rate was 93.3% (28 of 30) for all patients and 95.0% (19 of 20) for oncologic patients. No patients had major complications. In diagnostic biopsies, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy for identifying malignancy were 100% (17 of 17), 72.7% (8 of 11), 85.0% (17 of 20), 100% (8 of 8), and 89.3% (25 of 28) for all patients and 100% (14 of 14), 60.0% (3 of 5), 87.5% (14 of 16), 100% (3 of 3), and 89.5% (17 of 19) for oncologic patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study externally validated the feasibility and safety of TRUS- or TVUS-guided biopsy. In addition, these techniques appear to enable accurate pathologic diagnoses of pelvic masses in oncologic patients to be made safely and relatively noninvasively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6443595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64435952019-04-03 Transrectal or transvaginal ultrasoundguided biopsy for pelvic masses: external validation and usefulness in oncologic patients Won, So Yeon Kim, Hyun-Soo Park, Sung Yoon Ultrasonography Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to externally validate the diagnostic usefulness of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS)-guided biopsy for pelvic masses, and to analyze the diagnostic performance of these methods in oncologic patients. METHODS: A consecutive series of 30 patients who underwent TRUS- or TVUS-guided biopsy for pelvic masses was included. Tissue samples were obtained using an 18-gauge core biopsy needle under local anesthesia for lesions detected on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. We analyzed the rates of diagnostic biopsies upon pathologic examination and biopsy-related major complications requiring treatment. In diagnostic biopsy cases, the performance was also investigated for all patients and patients with underlying malignancy. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy rate was 93.3% (28 of 30) for all patients and 95.0% (19 of 20) for oncologic patients. No patients had major complications. In diagnostic biopsies, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy for identifying malignancy were 100% (17 of 17), 72.7% (8 of 11), 85.0% (17 of 20), 100% (8 of 8), and 89.3% (25 of 28) for all patients and 100% (14 of 14), 60.0% (3 of 5), 87.5% (14 of 16), 100% (3 of 3), and 89.5% (17 of 19) for oncologic patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study externally validated the feasibility and safety of TRUS- or TVUS-guided biopsy. In addition, these techniques appear to enable accurate pathologic diagnoses of pelvic masses in oncologic patients to be made safely and relatively noninvasively. Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine 2019-04 2018-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6443595/ /pubmed/30153726 http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.18028 Text en Copyright © 2019 Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (KSUM) This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Won, So Yeon
Kim, Hyun-Soo
Park, Sung Yoon
Transrectal or transvaginal ultrasoundguided biopsy for pelvic masses: external validation and usefulness in oncologic patients
title Transrectal or transvaginal ultrasoundguided biopsy for pelvic masses: external validation and usefulness in oncologic patients
title_full Transrectal or transvaginal ultrasoundguided biopsy for pelvic masses: external validation and usefulness in oncologic patients
title_fullStr Transrectal or transvaginal ultrasoundguided biopsy for pelvic masses: external validation and usefulness in oncologic patients
title_full_unstemmed Transrectal or transvaginal ultrasoundguided biopsy for pelvic masses: external validation and usefulness in oncologic patients
title_short Transrectal or transvaginal ultrasoundguided biopsy for pelvic masses: external validation and usefulness in oncologic patients
title_sort transrectal or transvaginal ultrasoundguided biopsy for pelvic masses: external validation and usefulness in oncologic patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30153726
http://dx.doi.org/10.14366/usg.18028
work_keys_str_mv AT wonsoyeon transrectalortransvaginalultrasoundguidedbiopsyforpelvicmassesexternalvalidationandusefulnessinoncologicpatients
AT kimhyunsoo transrectalortransvaginalultrasoundguidedbiopsyforpelvicmassesexternalvalidationandusefulnessinoncologicpatients
AT parksungyoon transrectalortransvaginalultrasoundguidedbiopsyforpelvicmassesexternalvalidationandusefulnessinoncologicpatients