Cargando…
Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms
Object: The pipeline embolization device (PED) has been used to treat non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms at some institutions. However, there is an absence of large controlled studies validating the feasibility of this treatment. This study aimed to explore the therapeut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30972007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00275 |
_version_ | 1783407870034837504 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yupeng Liang, Fei Zhang, Yuxiang Yan, Peng Liang, Shikai Ma, Chao Jiang, Chuhan |
author_facet | Zhang, Yupeng Liang, Fei Zhang, Yuxiang Yan, Peng Liang, Shikai Ma, Chao Jiang, Chuhan |
author_sort | Zhang, Yupeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Object: The pipeline embolization device (PED) has been used to treat non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms at some institutions. However, there is an absence of large controlled studies validating the feasibility of this treatment. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic feasibility of PED by comparing PED treatment with controlled stent-assisted coiling (SAC). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two PED procedures were matched in a 1:2 manner with 64 SAC procedures based on patient age, sex, aneurysm size, and aneurysm location. Technical factors, procedural complications, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in technical factors and procedural complications between the two groups (PED vs. SAC, 9.4 vs. 4.7%, P = 0.397). In multivariate analysis, smoking and therapeutic modality were identified as independent predictors of occlusion. Smoking was a risk factor for aneurysm obliteration [hazard ratio (HR) 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31–0.89; P = 0.018]. Aneurysms treated with PED were more likely to achieve obliteration over time compared with aneurysms treated with SAC (HR 2.97; 95% CI, 1.79–4.93; P < 0.001). The rate of favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS), 0–2) was similar between the two groups (PED vs. SAC, 100 vs. 96.9%, P = 0.551). In the SAC group, one patient had neurological deficit with an mRS of four at the latest follow-up. There was no mortality in either group. Conclusions: The PED and SAC groups showed similar technical factors, procedural complications, angiographic results, and favorable clinical outcomes. Aneurysms treated with PED were more prone to obliteration over time than aneurysms treated with SAC. These outcomes suggest, based on short-term follow-up, PED is a safe and feasible strategy for the treatment of non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6443633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64436332019-04-10 Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms Zhang, Yupeng Liang, Fei Zhang, Yuxiang Yan, Peng Liang, Shikai Ma, Chao Jiang, Chuhan Front Neurol Neurology Object: The pipeline embolization device (PED) has been used to treat non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms at some institutions. However, there is an absence of large controlled studies validating the feasibility of this treatment. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic feasibility of PED by comparing PED treatment with controlled stent-assisted coiling (SAC). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two PED procedures were matched in a 1:2 manner with 64 SAC procedures based on patient age, sex, aneurysm size, and aneurysm location. Technical factors, procedural complications, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in technical factors and procedural complications between the two groups (PED vs. SAC, 9.4 vs. 4.7%, P = 0.397). In multivariate analysis, smoking and therapeutic modality were identified as independent predictors of occlusion. Smoking was a risk factor for aneurysm obliteration [hazard ratio (HR) 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31–0.89; P = 0.018]. Aneurysms treated with PED were more likely to achieve obliteration over time compared with aneurysms treated with SAC (HR 2.97; 95% CI, 1.79–4.93; P < 0.001). The rate of favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS), 0–2) was similar between the two groups (PED vs. SAC, 100 vs. 96.9%, P = 0.551). In the SAC group, one patient had neurological deficit with an mRS of four at the latest follow-up. There was no mortality in either group. Conclusions: The PED and SAC groups showed similar technical factors, procedural complications, angiographic results, and favorable clinical outcomes. Aneurysms treated with PED were more prone to obliteration over time than aneurysms treated with SAC. These outcomes suggest, based on short-term follow-up, PED is a safe and feasible strategy for the treatment of non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6443633/ /pubmed/30972007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00275 Text en Copyright © 2019 Zhang, Liang, Zhang, Yan, Liang, Ma and Jiang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Zhang, Yupeng Liang, Fei Zhang, Yuxiang Yan, Peng Liang, Shikai Ma, Chao Jiang, Chuhan Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms |
title | Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms |
title_full | Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms |
title_fullStr | Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms |
title_short | Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms |
title_sort | exploring the feasibility of pipeline embolization device compared with stent-assisted coiling to treat non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30972007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00275 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyupeng exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms AT liangfei exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms AT zhangyuxiang exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms AT yanpeng exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms AT liangshikai exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms AT machao exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms AT jiangchuhan exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms |