Cargando…

Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms

Object: The pipeline embolization device (PED) has been used to treat non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms at some institutions. However, there is an absence of large controlled studies validating the feasibility of this treatment. This study aimed to explore the therapeut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yupeng, Liang, Fei, Zhang, Yuxiang, Yan, Peng, Liang, Shikai, Ma, Chao, Jiang, Chuhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30972007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00275
_version_ 1783407870034837504
author Zhang, Yupeng
Liang, Fei
Zhang, Yuxiang
Yan, Peng
Liang, Shikai
Ma, Chao
Jiang, Chuhan
author_facet Zhang, Yupeng
Liang, Fei
Zhang, Yuxiang
Yan, Peng
Liang, Shikai
Ma, Chao
Jiang, Chuhan
author_sort Zhang, Yupeng
collection PubMed
description Object: The pipeline embolization device (PED) has been used to treat non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms at some institutions. However, there is an absence of large controlled studies validating the feasibility of this treatment. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic feasibility of PED by comparing PED treatment with controlled stent-assisted coiling (SAC). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two PED procedures were matched in a 1:2 manner with 64 SAC procedures based on patient age, sex, aneurysm size, and aneurysm location. Technical factors, procedural complications, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in technical factors and procedural complications between the two groups (PED vs. SAC, 9.4 vs. 4.7%, P = 0.397). In multivariate analysis, smoking and therapeutic modality were identified as independent predictors of occlusion. Smoking was a risk factor for aneurysm obliteration [hazard ratio (HR) 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31–0.89; P = 0.018]. Aneurysms treated with PED were more likely to achieve obliteration over time compared with aneurysms treated with SAC (HR 2.97; 95% CI, 1.79–4.93; P < 0.001). The rate of favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS), 0–2) was similar between the two groups (PED vs. SAC, 100 vs. 96.9%, P = 0.551). In the SAC group, one patient had neurological deficit with an mRS of four at the latest follow-up. There was no mortality in either group. Conclusions: The PED and SAC groups showed similar technical factors, procedural complications, angiographic results, and favorable clinical outcomes. Aneurysms treated with PED were more prone to obliteration over time than aneurysms treated with SAC. These outcomes suggest, based on short-term follow-up, PED is a safe and feasible strategy for the treatment of non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6443633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64436332019-04-10 Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms Zhang, Yupeng Liang, Fei Zhang, Yuxiang Yan, Peng Liang, Shikai Ma, Chao Jiang, Chuhan Front Neurol Neurology Object: The pipeline embolization device (PED) has been used to treat non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms at some institutions. However, there is an absence of large controlled studies validating the feasibility of this treatment. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic feasibility of PED by comparing PED treatment with controlled stent-assisted coiling (SAC). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two PED procedures were matched in a 1:2 manner with 64 SAC procedures based on patient age, sex, aneurysm size, and aneurysm location. Technical factors, procedural complications, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in technical factors and procedural complications between the two groups (PED vs. SAC, 9.4 vs. 4.7%, P = 0.397). In multivariate analysis, smoking and therapeutic modality were identified as independent predictors of occlusion. Smoking was a risk factor for aneurysm obliteration [hazard ratio (HR) 0.53; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31–0.89; P = 0.018]. Aneurysms treated with PED were more likely to achieve obliteration over time compared with aneurysms treated with SAC (HR 2.97; 95% CI, 1.79–4.93; P < 0.001). The rate of favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS), 0–2) was similar between the two groups (PED vs. SAC, 100 vs. 96.9%, P = 0.551). In the SAC group, one patient had neurological deficit with an mRS of four at the latest follow-up. There was no mortality in either group. Conclusions: The PED and SAC groups showed similar technical factors, procedural complications, angiographic results, and favorable clinical outcomes. Aneurysms treated with PED were more prone to obliteration over time than aneurysms treated with SAC. These outcomes suggest, based on short-term follow-up, PED is a safe and feasible strategy for the treatment of non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6443633/ /pubmed/30972007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00275 Text en Copyright © 2019 Zhang, Liang, Zhang, Yan, Liang, Ma and Jiang. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Zhang, Yupeng
Liang, Fei
Zhang, Yuxiang
Yan, Peng
Liang, Shikai
Ma, Chao
Jiang, Chuhan
Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms
title Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms
title_full Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms
title_fullStr Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms
title_short Exploring the Feasibility of Pipeline Embolization Device Compared With Stent-Assisted Coiling to Treat Non-saccular, Unruptured, Intradural Vertebral Artery Aneurysms
title_sort exploring the feasibility of pipeline embolization device compared with stent-assisted coiling to treat non-saccular, unruptured, intradural vertebral artery aneurysms
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30972007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00275
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyupeng exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms
AT liangfei exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms
AT zhangyuxiang exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms
AT yanpeng exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms
AT liangshikai exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms
AT machao exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms
AT jiangchuhan exploringthefeasibilityofpipelineembolizationdevicecomparedwithstentassistedcoilingtotreatnonsaccularunrupturedintraduralvertebralarteryaneurysms