Cargando…

Are we getting any better? A study on repair integrity in 1600 consecutive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs

BACKGROUND: Postoperative retear is the most common surgical complication after rotator cuff repair. This study aimed to determine whether there had been any improvements in rotator cuff repair integrity in our center and to identify any changes in the management of rotator cuff tears that may have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McColl, Alexander H., Lam, Patrick H., Murrell, George A.C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2019.01.002
_version_ 1783407905218756608
author McColl, Alexander H.
Lam, Patrick H.
Murrell, George A.C.
author_facet McColl, Alexander H.
Lam, Patrick H.
Murrell, George A.C.
author_sort McColl, Alexander H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postoperative retear is the most common surgical complication after rotator cuff repair. This study aimed to determine whether there had been any improvements in rotator cuff repair integrity in our center and to identify any changes in the management of rotator cuff tears that may have impacted postoperative retear rate. METHODS: This retrospective observational single cohort study used running average analysis to examine 1600 consecutive patients over 8 years, who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by a single surgeon, and had cuff integrity assessed by ultrasound 6 months after operation. RESULTS: Retear rates ranged from 3% to 34%, with a mean of 15%. Over our study retear rates decreased from 18% to 5%. Reductions in retear rates were associated with less aggressive rehabilitation, postoperative abduction sling use, and increased surgical experience. Increases in retear rates were associated with increased false positives with a more sensitive ultrasound machine and learning curves with new equipment for a surgeon and sonographer. CONCLUSION: A decrease in retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair occurred during our study. Although the study design prevents us from directly attributing changes in retear rate to changes in management, our results suggest that rehabilitation optimization and increased surgeon experience decrease postoperative retear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6443836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64438362019-04-11 Are we getting any better? A study on repair integrity in 1600 consecutive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs McColl, Alexander H. Lam, Patrick H. Murrell, George A.C. JSES Open Access Article BACKGROUND: Postoperative retear is the most common surgical complication after rotator cuff repair. This study aimed to determine whether there had been any improvements in rotator cuff repair integrity in our center and to identify any changes in the management of rotator cuff tears that may have impacted postoperative retear rate. METHODS: This retrospective observational single cohort study used running average analysis to examine 1600 consecutive patients over 8 years, who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by a single surgeon, and had cuff integrity assessed by ultrasound 6 months after operation. RESULTS: Retear rates ranged from 3% to 34%, with a mean of 15%. Over our study retear rates decreased from 18% to 5%. Reductions in retear rates were associated with less aggressive rehabilitation, postoperative abduction sling use, and increased surgical experience. Increases in retear rates were associated with increased false positives with a more sensitive ultrasound machine and learning curves with new equipment for a surgeon and sonographer. CONCLUSION: A decrease in retear rate after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair occurred during our study. Although the study design prevents us from directly attributing changes in retear rate to changes in management, our results suggest that rehabilitation optimization and increased surgeon experience decrease postoperative retear. Elsevier 2019-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6443836/ /pubmed/30976730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2019.01.002 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
McColl, Alexander H.
Lam, Patrick H.
Murrell, George A.C.
Are we getting any better? A study on repair integrity in 1600 consecutive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
title Are we getting any better? A study on repair integrity in 1600 consecutive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
title_full Are we getting any better? A study on repair integrity in 1600 consecutive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
title_fullStr Are we getting any better? A study on repair integrity in 1600 consecutive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
title_full_unstemmed Are we getting any better? A study on repair integrity in 1600 consecutive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
title_short Are we getting any better? A study on repair integrity in 1600 consecutive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
title_sort are we getting any better? a study on repair integrity in 1600 consecutive arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976730
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2019.01.002
work_keys_str_mv AT mccollalexanderh arewegettinganybetterastudyonrepairintegrityin1600consecutivearthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairs
AT lampatrickh arewegettinganybetterastudyonrepairintegrityin1600consecutivearthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairs
AT murrellgeorgeac arewegettinganybetterastudyonrepairintegrityin1600consecutivearthroscopicrotatorcuffrepairs