Cargando…

Prognosis-based definition of left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold-standard modality for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) remodeling in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, the commonly used remodeling criteria have never been validated for hard clinical events. We therefore ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reindl, Martin, Reinstadler, Sebastian Johannes, Tiller, Christina, Feistritzer, Hans-Josef, Kofler, Markus, Brix, Alexandra, Mayr, Agnes, Klug, Gert, Metzler, Bernhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30547201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5875-3
_version_ 1783407923787988992
author Reindl, Martin
Reinstadler, Sebastian Johannes
Tiller, Christina
Feistritzer, Hans-Josef
Kofler, Markus
Brix, Alexandra
Mayr, Agnes
Klug, Gert
Metzler, Bernhard
author_facet Reindl, Martin
Reinstadler, Sebastian Johannes
Tiller, Christina
Feistritzer, Hans-Josef
Kofler, Markus
Brix, Alexandra
Mayr, Agnes
Klug, Gert
Metzler, Bernhard
author_sort Reindl, Martin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold-standard modality for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) remodeling in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, the commonly used remodeling criteria have never been validated for hard clinical events. We therefore aimed to define clear CMR criteria of LV remodeling following STEMI with proven prognostic impact. METHODS: This observational study included 224 patients suffering from acute STEMI. CMR was performed within 1 week and 4 months after infarction to evaluate different remodeling criteria including relative changes in LV end-diastolic volume (%∆LVEDV), end-systolic volume (%∆LVESV), ejection fraction (%∆LVEF), and myocardial mass (%∆LVMM). Primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including all-cause death, re-infarction, stroke, and new congestive heart failure 24 months following STEMI. Secondary endpoint was defined as composite of primary endpoint and cardiovascular hospitalization. The Mann–Whitney U test was applied to assess differences in LV remodeling measures between patients with and without MACE. Values for the prediction of primary and secondary endpoints were assessed by c-statistics and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of MACE (n = 13, 6%) was associated with higher %∆LVEDV (p = 0.002) and %∆LVMM (p = 0.02), whereas %∆LVESV and %∆LVEF were not significantly related to MACE (p > 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of MACE was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–0.87) for %∆LVEDV (optimal cut-off 10%) and 0.69 (95%CI, 0.52–0.85) for %∆LVMM (optimal cut-off 5%). From all remodeling criteria, %∆LVEDV ≥ 10% showed highest hazard ratio (8.68 [95%CI, 2.39–31.56]; p = 0.001) for MACE. Regarding secondary endpoint (n = 35, 16%), also %∆LVEDV with an optimal threshold of 10% emerged as strongest prognosticator (AUC 0.66; 95%CI, 0.56–0.75; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Following revascularized STEMI, %∆LVEDV ≥ 10% showed strongest association with clinical outcome, suggesting this criterion as preferred CMR-based definition of post-STEMI LV remodeling. KEY POINTS: • CMR-determined %∆LVEDV and %∆LVMM were significantly associated with MACE following STEMI. • Neither %∆LVESV nor %∆LVEF showed a significant relation to MACE. • %∆LVEDV ≥ 10 was revealed as LV remodeling definition with highest prognostic validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6443916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64439162019-04-17 Prognosis-based definition of left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction Reindl, Martin Reinstadler, Sebastian Johannes Tiller, Christina Feistritzer, Hans-Josef Kofler, Markus Brix, Alexandra Mayr, Agnes Klug, Gert Metzler, Bernhard Eur Radiol Cardiac OBJECTIVES: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold-standard modality for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) remodeling in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. However, the commonly used remodeling criteria have never been validated for hard clinical events. We therefore aimed to define clear CMR criteria of LV remodeling following STEMI with proven prognostic impact. METHODS: This observational study included 224 patients suffering from acute STEMI. CMR was performed within 1 week and 4 months after infarction to evaluate different remodeling criteria including relative changes in LV end-diastolic volume (%∆LVEDV), end-systolic volume (%∆LVESV), ejection fraction (%∆LVEF), and myocardial mass (%∆LVMM). Primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including all-cause death, re-infarction, stroke, and new congestive heart failure 24 months following STEMI. Secondary endpoint was defined as composite of primary endpoint and cardiovascular hospitalization. The Mann–Whitney U test was applied to assess differences in LV remodeling measures between patients with and without MACE. Values for the prediction of primary and secondary endpoints were assessed by c-statistics and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of MACE (n = 13, 6%) was associated with higher %∆LVEDV (p = 0.002) and %∆LVMM (p = 0.02), whereas %∆LVESV and %∆LVEF were not significantly related to MACE (p > 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of MACE was 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65–0.87) for %∆LVEDV (optimal cut-off 10%) and 0.69 (95%CI, 0.52–0.85) for %∆LVMM (optimal cut-off 5%). From all remodeling criteria, %∆LVEDV ≥ 10% showed highest hazard ratio (8.68 [95%CI, 2.39–31.56]; p = 0.001) for MACE. Regarding secondary endpoint (n = 35, 16%), also %∆LVEDV with an optimal threshold of 10% emerged as strongest prognosticator (AUC 0.66; 95%CI, 0.56–0.75; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Following revascularized STEMI, %∆LVEDV ≥ 10% showed strongest association with clinical outcome, suggesting this criterion as preferred CMR-based definition of post-STEMI LV remodeling. KEY POINTS: • CMR-determined %∆LVEDV and %∆LVMM were significantly associated with MACE following STEMI. • Neither %∆LVESV nor %∆LVEF showed a significant relation to MACE. • %∆LVEDV ≥ 10 was revealed as LV remodeling definition with highest prognostic validity. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-12-13 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6443916/ /pubmed/30547201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5875-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Cardiac
Reindl, Martin
Reinstadler, Sebastian Johannes
Tiller, Christina
Feistritzer, Hans-Josef
Kofler, Markus
Brix, Alexandra
Mayr, Agnes
Klug, Gert
Metzler, Bernhard
Prognosis-based definition of left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title Prognosis-based definition of left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title_full Prognosis-based definition of left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title_fullStr Prognosis-based definition of left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis-based definition of left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title_short Prognosis-based definition of left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction
title_sort prognosis-based definition of left ventricular remodeling after st-elevation myocardial infarction
topic Cardiac
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30547201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5875-3
work_keys_str_mv AT reindlmartin prognosisbaseddefinitionofleftventricularremodelingafterstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT reinstadlersebastianjohannes prognosisbaseddefinitionofleftventricularremodelingafterstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT tillerchristina prognosisbaseddefinitionofleftventricularremodelingafterstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT feistritzerhansjosef prognosisbaseddefinitionofleftventricularremodelingafterstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT koflermarkus prognosisbaseddefinitionofleftventricularremodelingafterstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT brixalexandra prognosisbaseddefinitionofleftventricularremodelingafterstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT mayragnes prognosisbaseddefinitionofleftventricularremodelingafterstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT kluggert prognosisbaseddefinitionofleftventricularremodelingafterstelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT metzlerbernhard prognosisbaseddefinitionofleftventricularremodelingafterstelevationmyocardialinfarction