Cargando…

Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic potential of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is under investigation for a range of inflammatory conditions. While mechanisms of benefit are poorly understood, most models rely on the viability of transplanted microbes. We hypothesised that protocols commonly used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papanicolas, Lito E., Choo, Jocelyn M., Wang, Yanan, Leong, Lex E.X., Costello, Samuel P., Gordon, David L., Wesselingh, Steve L., Rogers, Geraint B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30796005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.02.023
_version_ 1783407955924746240
author Papanicolas, Lito E.
Choo, Jocelyn M.
Wang, Yanan
Leong, Lex E.X.
Costello, Samuel P.
Gordon, David L.
Wesselingh, Steve L.
Rogers, Geraint B.
author_facet Papanicolas, Lito E.
Choo, Jocelyn M.
Wang, Yanan
Leong, Lex E.X.
Costello, Samuel P.
Gordon, David L.
Wesselingh, Steve L.
Rogers, Geraint B.
author_sort Papanicolas, Lito E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The therapeutic potential of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is under investigation for a range of inflammatory conditions. While mechanisms of benefit are poorly understood, most models rely on the viability of transplanted microbes. We hypothesised that protocols commonly used in the preparation of faecal transplants will substantially reduce the number, diversity and functional potential of viable microbes. METHODS: Stools from eight screened donors were processed under strict anaerobic conditions, in ambient air, and freeze-thawed. Propidium monoazide (PMA) sample treatment was combined with quantitative PCR, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) analysis to define the viable microbiota composition and functional potential. FINDINGS: Approximately 50% of bacterial content of stool processed immediately under strict anaerobic conditions was non-viable. Homogenisation in ambient air or freeze-thaw reduced viability to 19% and 23% respectively. Processing of samples in ambient air resulted in up to 12-fold reductions in the abundance of important commensal taxa, including the highly butyrogenic species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Subdoligranulum variable, and Eubacterium hallii. The adverse impact of atmospheric oxygen exposure on the capacity of the transplanted microbiota to support SCFA biosynthesis was demonstrated by significantly reduced butyrate and acetate production by faecal slurries processed in ambient air. In contrast, while reducing overall levels of viable bacteria, freeze-thaw did not significantly alter viable microbiota composition. INTERPRETATION: The practice of preparing material for faecal transplantation in ambient air profoundly affects viable microbial content, disproportionately reducing the abundance of anaerobic commensals and the capacity for biosynthesis of important anti-inflammatory metabolites. FUND: This work was supported by the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute. LP is supported by a scholarship from the Flinders Foundation. GR is supported by a Matthew Flinders Research Fellowship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6444077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64440772019-04-11 Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive? Papanicolas, Lito E. Choo, Jocelyn M. Wang, Yanan Leong, Lex E.X. Costello, Samuel P. Gordon, David L. Wesselingh, Steve L. Rogers, Geraint B. EBioMedicine Research paper BACKGROUND: The therapeutic potential of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is under investigation for a range of inflammatory conditions. While mechanisms of benefit are poorly understood, most models rely on the viability of transplanted microbes. We hypothesised that protocols commonly used in the preparation of faecal transplants will substantially reduce the number, diversity and functional potential of viable microbes. METHODS: Stools from eight screened donors were processed under strict anaerobic conditions, in ambient air, and freeze-thawed. Propidium monoazide (PMA) sample treatment was combined with quantitative PCR, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) analysis to define the viable microbiota composition and functional potential. FINDINGS: Approximately 50% of bacterial content of stool processed immediately under strict anaerobic conditions was non-viable. Homogenisation in ambient air or freeze-thaw reduced viability to 19% and 23% respectively. Processing of samples in ambient air resulted in up to 12-fold reductions in the abundance of important commensal taxa, including the highly butyrogenic species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Subdoligranulum variable, and Eubacterium hallii. The adverse impact of atmospheric oxygen exposure on the capacity of the transplanted microbiota to support SCFA biosynthesis was demonstrated by significantly reduced butyrate and acetate production by faecal slurries processed in ambient air. In contrast, while reducing overall levels of viable bacteria, freeze-thaw did not significantly alter viable microbiota composition. INTERPRETATION: The practice of preparing material for faecal transplantation in ambient air profoundly affects viable microbial content, disproportionately reducing the abundance of anaerobic commensals and the capacity for biosynthesis of important anti-inflammatory metabolites. FUND: This work was supported by the South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute. LP is supported by a scholarship from the Flinders Foundation. GR is supported by a Matthew Flinders Research Fellowship. Elsevier 2019-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6444077/ /pubmed/30796005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.02.023 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research paper
Papanicolas, Lito E.
Choo, Jocelyn M.
Wang, Yanan
Leong, Lex E.X.
Costello, Samuel P.
Gordon, David L.
Wesselingh, Steve L.
Rogers, Geraint B.
Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?
title Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?
title_full Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?
title_fullStr Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?
title_short Bacterial viability in faecal transplants: Which bacteria survive?
title_sort bacterial viability in faecal transplants: which bacteria survive?
topic Research paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30796005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.02.023
work_keys_str_mv AT papanicolaslitoe bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurvive
AT choojocelynm bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurvive
AT wangyanan bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurvive
AT leonglexex bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurvive
AT costellosamuelp bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurvive
AT gordondavidl bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurvive
AT wesselinghstevel bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurvive
AT rogersgeraintb bacterialviabilityinfaecaltransplantswhichbacteriasurvive