Cargando…

The influence of radiographic markers of biomechanical variables on outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in regard to variability in the center of rotation (COR), which modifies the superior-inferior position of the humerus to affect the acromiohumeral interval (AHI), and its effect on the deltoid lever arm (DLA), acromial index (AI)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberson, Troy A., Shanley, Ellen, Abildgaard, Jeffrey T., Granade, Charles M., Adams, Kyle J., Griscom, James T., Hunt, Quinn, Nix, Quinn, Kissenberth, Michael J., Tolan, Stefan J., Hawkins, Richard J., Tokish, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2018.11.003
_version_ 1783407966669504512
author Roberson, Troy A.
Shanley, Ellen
Abildgaard, Jeffrey T.
Granade, Charles M.
Adams, Kyle J.
Griscom, James T.
Hunt, Quinn
Nix, Quinn
Kissenberth, Michael J.
Tolan, Stefan J.
Hawkins, Richard J.
Tokish, John M.
author_facet Roberson, Troy A.
Shanley, Ellen
Abildgaard, Jeffrey T.
Granade, Charles M.
Adams, Kyle J.
Griscom, James T.
Hunt, Quinn
Nix, Quinn
Kissenberth, Michael J.
Tolan, Stefan J.
Hawkins, Richard J.
Tokish, John M.
author_sort Roberson, Troy A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Controversy exists in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in regard to variability in the center of rotation (COR), which modifies the superior-inferior position of the humerus to affect the acromiohumeral interval (AHI), and its effect on the deltoid lever arm (DLA), acromial index (AI), and critical shoulder angle (CSA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the variation in biomechanics and the association with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and range of motion (ROM) measurements. METHODS: Radiographs, ROM, and 2-year PRO scores were retrospectively reviewed for 108 patients. RESULTS: There was large variability in preoperative and postoperative biomechanics. The COR was medialized 12.01 ± 4.8 mm. The CSA increased 2.64° ± 12.45°. The AHI increased 20.6 ± 9.80 mm. The DLA lengthened 21.21 ± 10.15 mm. The AI increased 0.009 ± 0.3. Postoperative AI positively correlated with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Penn Shoulder Score (P = .03). Specifically, a postoperative AI of 0.62 corresponded to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (72.5 ± 18.3 vs. 62.3 ± 24.7; P = .02) and Penn Shoulder Score (71.2 ± 21.4 vs. 61.8 ± 25.6; P = .05), an average 10 points higher than AI of <0.6. Also, a smaller postoperative CSA (<25°) correlated with improved forward elevation (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluates the variability of biomechanical factors and their impact on postoperative ROM and PROs. An increased AI and decreased CSA are associated with improved PROs in this study, and a smaller CSA is associated with better forward elevation. Change in the COR, AHI, or DLA, however, did not affect patient outcomes or ROM. Further study is warranted to determine the optimal position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6444123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64441232019-04-12 The influence of radiographic markers of biomechanical variables on outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty Roberson, Troy A. Shanley, Ellen Abildgaard, Jeffrey T. Granade, Charles M. Adams, Kyle J. Griscom, James T. Hunt, Quinn Nix, Quinn Kissenberth, Michael J. Tolan, Stefan J. Hawkins, Richard J. Tokish, John M. JSES Open Access Article BACKGROUND: Controversy exists in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in regard to variability in the center of rotation (COR), which modifies the superior-inferior position of the humerus to affect the acromiohumeral interval (AHI), and its effect on the deltoid lever arm (DLA), acromial index (AI), and critical shoulder angle (CSA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the variation in biomechanics and the association with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and range of motion (ROM) measurements. METHODS: Radiographs, ROM, and 2-year PRO scores were retrospectively reviewed for 108 patients. RESULTS: There was large variability in preoperative and postoperative biomechanics. The COR was medialized 12.01 ± 4.8 mm. The CSA increased 2.64° ± 12.45°. The AHI increased 20.6 ± 9.80 mm. The DLA lengthened 21.21 ± 10.15 mm. The AI increased 0.009 ± 0.3. Postoperative AI positively correlated with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Penn Shoulder Score (P = .03). Specifically, a postoperative AI of 0.62 corresponded to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (72.5 ± 18.3 vs. 62.3 ± 24.7; P = .02) and Penn Shoulder Score (71.2 ± 21.4 vs. 61.8 ± 25.6; P = .05), an average 10 points higher than AI of <0.6. Also, a smaller postoperative CSA (<25°) correlated with improved forward elevation (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that evaluates the variability of biomechanical factors and their impact on postoperative ROM and PROs. An increased AI and decreased CSA are associated with improved PROs in this study, and a smaller CSA is associated with better forward elevation. Change in the COR, AHI, or DLA, however, did not affect patient outcomes or ROM. Further study is warranted to determine the optimal position. Elsevier 2019-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6444123/ /pubmed/30984894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2018.11.003 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Roberson, Troy A.
Shanley, Ellen
Abildgaard, Jeffrey T.
Granade, Charles M.
Adams, Kyle J.
Griscom, James T.
Hunt, Quinn
Nix, Quinn
Kissenberth, Michael J.
Tolan, Stefan J.
Hawkins, Richard J.
Tokish, John M.
The influence of radiographic markers of biomechanical variables on outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title The influence of radiographic markers of biomechanical variables on outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_full The influence of radiographic markers of biomechanical variables on outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_fullStr The influence of radiographic markers of biomechanical variables on outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed The influence of radiographic markers of biomechanical variables on outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_short The influence of radiographic markers of biomechanical variables on outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_sort influence of radiographic markers of biomechanical variables on outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2018.11.003
work_keys_str_mv AT robersontroya theinfluenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT shanleyellen theinfluenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT abildgaardjeffreyt theinfluenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT granadecharlesm theinfluenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT adamskylej theinfluenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT griscomjamest theinfluenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT huntquinn theinfluenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT nixquinn theinfluenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT kissenberthmichaelj theinfluenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT tolanstefanj theinfluenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT hawkinsrichardj theinfluenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT tokishjohnm theinfluenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT robersontroya influenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT shanleyellen influenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT abildgaardjeffreyt influenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT granadecharlesm influenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT adamskylej influenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT griscomjamest influenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT huntquinn influenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT nixquinn influenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT kissenberthmichaelj influenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT tolanstefanj influenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT hawkinsrichardj influenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT tokishjohnm influenceofradiographicmarkersofbiomechanicalvariablesonoutcomesinreverseshoulderarthroplasty