Cargando…
Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Smartphone apps are a promising tool for delivering accessible and appealing physical activity interventions. Given the large growth of research in this field, there are now enough studies using the “gold standard” of experimental design—the randomized controlled trial design—and employi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30888321 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12053 |
_version_ | 1783407987477446656 |
---|---|
author | Romeo, Amelia Edney, Sarah Plotnikoff, Ronald Curtis, Rachel Ryan, Jillian Sanders, Ilea Crozier, Alyson Maher, Carol |
author_facet | Romeo, Amelia Edney, Sarah Plotnikoff, Ronald Curtis, Rachel Ryan, Jillian Sanders, Ilea Crozier, Alyson Maher, Carol |
author_sort | Romeo, Amelia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Smartphone apps are a promising tool for delivering accessible and appealing physical activity interventions. Given the large growth of research in this field, there are now enough studies using the “gold standard” of experimental design—the randomized controlled trial design—and employing objective measurements of physical activity, to support a meta-analysis of these scientifically rigorous studies. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of smartphone apps for increasing objectively measured physical activity in adults. METHODS: A total of 7 electronic databases (EMBASE, EmCare, MEDLINE, Scopus, Sport Discus, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched from 2007 to January 2018. Following the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Study Design format, studies were eligible if they were randomized controlled trials involving adults, used a smartphone app as the primary or sole component of the physical activity intervention, used a no- or minimal-intervention control condition, and measured objective physical activity either in the form of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity minutes or steps. Study quality was assessed using a 25-item tool based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials checklist. A meta-analysis of study effects was conducted using a random effects model approach. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine whether intervention effectiveness differed on the basis of intervention length, target behavior (physical activity alone vs physical activity in combination with other health behaviors), or target population (general adult population vs specific health populations). RESULTS: Following removal of duplicates, a total of 6170 studies were identified from the original database searches. Of these, 9 studies, involving a total of 1740 participants, met eligibility criteria. Of these, 6 studies could be included in a meta-analysis of the effects of physical activity apps on steps per day. In comparison with the control conditions, smartphone apps produced a nonsignificant (P=.19) increase in participants’ average steps per day, with a mean difference of 476.75 steps per day (95% CI −229.57 to 1183.07) between groups. Sensitivity analyses suggested that physical activity programs with a duration of less than 3 months were more effective than apps evaluated across more than 3 months (P=.01), and that physical activity apps that targeted physical activity in isolation were more effective than apps that targeted physical activity in combination with diet (P=.04). Physical activity app effectiveness did not appear to differ on the basis of target population. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides modest evidence supporting the effectiveness of smartphone apps to increase physical activity. To date, apps have been most effective in the short term (eg, up to 3 months). Future research is needed to understand the time course of intervention effects and to investigate strategies to sustain intervention effects over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6444212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64442122019-04-17 Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Romeo, Amelia Edney, Sarah Plotnikoff, Ronald Curtis, Rachel Ryan, Jillian Sanders, Ilea Crozier, Alyson Maher, Carol J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Smartphone apps are a promising tool for delivering accessible and appealing physical activity interventions. Given the large growth of research in this field, there are now enough studies using the “gold standard” of experimental design—the randomized controlled trial design—and employing objective measurements of physical activity, to support a meta-analysis of these scientifically rigorous studies. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of smartphone apps for increasing objectively measured physical activity in adults. METHODS: A total of 7 electronic databases (EMBASE, EmCare, MEDLINE, Scopus, Sport Discus, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched from 2007 to January 2018. Following the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Study Design format, studies were eligible if they were randomized controlled trials involving adults, used a smartphone app as the primary or sole component of the physical activity intervention, used a no- or minimal-intervention control condition, and measured objective physical activity either in the form of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity minutes or steps. Study quality was assessed using a 25-item tool based on the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials checklist. A meta-analysis of study effects was conducted using a random effects model approach. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine whether intervention effectiveness differed on the basis of intervention length, target behavior (physical activity alone vs physical activity in combination with other health behaviors), or target population (general adult population vs specific health populations). RESULTS: Following removal of duplicates, a total of 6170 studies were identified from the original database searches. Of these, 9 studies, involving a total of 1740 participants, met eligibility criteria. Of these, 6 studies could be included in a meta-analysis of the effects of physical activity apps on steps per day. In comparison with the control conditions, smartphone apps produced a nonsignificant (P=.19) increase in participants’ average steps per day, with a mean difference of 476.75 steps per day (95% CI −229.57 to 1183.07) between groups. Sensitivity analyses suggested that physical activity programs with a duration of less than 3 months were more effective than apps evaluated across more than 3 months (P=.01), and that physical activity apps that targeted physical activity in isolation were more effective than apps that targeted physical activity in combination with diet (P=.04). Physical activity app effectiveness did not appear to differ on the basis of target population. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides modest evidence supporting the effectiveness of smartphone apps to increase physical activity. To date, apps have been most effective in the short term (eg, up to 3 months). Future research is needed to understand the time course of intervention effects and to investigate strategies to sustain intervention effects over time. JMIR Publications 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6444212/ /pubmed/30888321 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12053 Text en ©Amelia Romeo, Sarah Edney, Ronald Plotnikoff, Rachel Curtis, Jillian Ryan, Ilea Sanders, Alyson Crozier, Carol Maher. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 19.03.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Romeo, Amelia Edney, Sarah Plotnikoff, Ronald Curtis, Rachel Ryan, Jillian Sanders, Ilea Crozier, Alyson Maher, Carol Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Can Smartphone Apps Increase Physical Activity? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | can smartphone apps increase physical activity? systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30888321 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/12053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romeoamelia cansmartphoneappsincreasephysicalactivitysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT edneysarah cansmartphoneappsincreasephysicalactivitysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT plotnikoffronald cansmartphoneappsincreasephysicalactivitysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT curtisrachel cansmartphoneappsincreasephysicalactivitysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ryanjillian cansmartphoneappsincreasephysicalactivitysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sandersilea cansmartphoneappsincreasephysicalactivitysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT crozieralyson cansmartphoneappsincreasephysicalactivitysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mahercarol cansmartphoneappsincreasephysicalactivitysystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |