Cargando…
Epidural Analgesia for Severe Chest Trauma: An Analysis of Current Practice on the Efficacy and Safety
BACKGROUND: Adequate pain control is essential in the treatment of patients with traumatic rib fractures. Although epidural analgesia is recommended in international guidelines, the use remains debatable and is not undisputed. The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of epidural...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31016043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4837591 |
_version_ | 1783407994777632768 |
---|---|
author | Peek, Jesse Beks, Reinier B. Kingma, B. Feike Marsman, Marije Ruurda, Jelle P. Houwert, Roderick M. Leenen, Loek P. H. Hietbrink, Falco de Jong, Mirjam B. |
author_facet | Peek, Jesse Beks, Reinier B. Kingma, B. Feike Marsman, Marije Ruurda, Jelle P. Houwert, Roderick M. Leenen, Loek P. H. Hietbrink, Falco de Jong, Mirjam B. |
author_sort | Peek, Jesse |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adequate pain control is essential in the treatment of patients with traumatic rib fractures. Although epidural analgesia is recommended in international guidelines, the use remains debatable and is not undisputed. The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with ≥3 rib fractures following blunt chest trauma who received epidural analgesia between January 2015 and January 2018 were included. The main outcome parameters were the success rate of epidural analgesia and the incidence of medication-related side effects and catheter-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included. Epidural analgesia was successful in a total of 45 patients (59%), including 22 patients without and in 23 patients with an additional analgesic intervention. In 14 patients (18%), epidural analgesia was terminated early without intervention due to insufficient sensory blockade (n=4), medication-related side effects (n=4), and catheter-related complications (n=6). In 17 patients (22%), the epidural catheter was removed after one or multiple additional interventions due to insufficient pain control. Minor epidural-related complications or side effects were encountered in 36 patients (47%). One patient had a major complication (opioid intoxication). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia was successful in 59% of patients; however, 30% needed additional analgesic interventions. As about half of the patients had epidural-related complications, it remains debatable whether epidural analgesia is a sufficient treatment modality in patients with multiple rib fractures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6444241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64442412019-04-23 Epidural Analgesia for Severe Chest Trauma: An Analysis of Current Practice on the Efficacy and Safety Peek, Jesse Beks, Reinier B. Kingma, B. Feike Marsman, Marije Ruurda, Jelle P. Houwert, Roderick M. Leenen, Loek P. H. Hietbrink, Falco de Jong, Mirjam B. Crit Care Res Pract Clinical Study BACKGROUND: Adequate pain control is essential in the treatment of patients with traumatic rib fractures. Although epidural analgesia is recommended in international guidelines, the use remains debatable and is not undisputed. The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with ≥3 rib fractures following blunt chest trauma who received epidural analgesia between January 2015 and January 2018 were included. The main outcome parameters were the success rate of epidural analgesia and the incidence of medication-related side effects and catheter-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included. Epidural analgesia was successful in a total of 45 patients (59%), including 22 patients without and in 23 patients with an additional analgesic intervention. In 14 patients (18%), epidural analgesia was terminated early without intervention due to insufficient sensory blockade (n=4), medication-related side effects (n=4), and catheter-related complications (n=6). In 17 patients (22%), the epidural catheter was removed after one or multiple additional interventions due to insufficient pain control. Minor epidural-related complications or side effects were encountered in 36 patients (47%). One patient had a major complication (opioid intoxication). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia was successful in 59% of patients; however, 30% needed additional analgesic interventions. As about half of the patients had epidural-related complications, it remains debatable whether epidural analgesia is a sufficient treatment modality in patients with multiple rib fractures. Hindawi 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6444241/ /pubmed/31016043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4837591 Text en Copyright © 2019 Jesse Peek et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Peek, Jesse Beks, Reinier B. Kingma, B. Feike Marsman, Marije Ruurda, Jelle P. Houwert, Roderick M. Leenen, Loek P. H. Hietbrink, Falco de Jong, Mirjam B. Epidural Analgesia for Severe Chest Trauma: An Analysis of Current Practice on the Efficacy and Safety |
title | Epidural Analgesia for Severe Chest Trauma: An Analysis of Current Practice on the Efficacy and Safety |
title_full | Epidural Analgesia for Severe Chest Trauma: An Analysis of Current Practice on the Efficacy and Safety |
title_fullStr | Epidural Analgesia for Severe Chest Trauma: An Analysis of Current Practice on the Efficacy and Safety |
title_full_unstemmed | Epidural Analgesia for Severe Chest Trauma: An Analysis of Current Practice on the Efficacy and Safety |
title_short | Epidural Analgesia for Severe Chest Trauma: An Analysis of Current Practice on the Efficacy and Safety |
title_sort | epidural analgesia for severe chest trauma: an analysis of current practice on the efficacy and safety |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31016043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/4837591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peekjesse epiduralanalgesiaforseverechesttraumaananalysisofcurrentpracticeontheefficacyandsafety AT beksreinierb epiduralanalgesiaforseverechesttraumaananalysisofcurrentpracticeontheefficacyandsafety AT kingmabfeike epiduralanalgesiaforseverechesttraumaananalysisofcurrentpracticeontheefficacyandsafety AT marsmanmarije epiduralanalgesiaforseverechesttraumaananalysisofcurrentpracticeontheefficacyandsafety AT ruurdajellep epiduralanalgesiaforseverechesttraumaananalysisofcurrentpracticeontheefficacyandsafety AT houwertroderickm epiduralanalgesiaforseverechesttraumaananalysisofcurrentpracticeontheefficacyandsafety AT leenenloekph epiduralanalgesiaforseverechesttraumaananalysisofcurrentpracticeontheefficacyandsafety AT hietbrinkfalco epiduralanalgesiaforseverechesttraumaananalysisofcurrentpracticeontheefficacyandsafety AT dejongmirjamb epiduralanalgesiaforseverechesttraumaananalysisofcurrentpracticeontheefficacyandsafety |