Cargando…

Quantitative phenotype analysis to identify, validate and compare rat disease models

The laboratory rat has been widely used as an animal model in biomedical research. There are many strains exhibiting a wide variety of phenotypes. Capturing these phenotypes in a centralized database provides researchers with an easy method for choosing the appropriate strains for their studies. Exi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yiqing, Smith, Jennifer R, Wang, Shur-Jen, Dwinell, Melinda R, Shimoyama, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30938777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baz037
_version_ 1783408019477889024
author Zhao, Yiqing
Smith, Jennifer R
Wang, Shur-Jen
Dwinell, Melinda R
Shimoyama, Mary
author_facet Zhao, Yiqing
Smith, Jennifer R
Wang, Shur-Jen
Dwinell, Melinda R
Shimoyama, Mary
author_sort Zhao, Yiqing
collection PubMed
description The laboratory rat has been widely used as an animal model in biomedical research. There are many strains exhibiting a wide variety of phenotypes. Capturing these phenotypes in a centralized database provides researchers with an easy method for choosing the appropriate strains for their studies. Existing resources have provided some preliminary work in rat phenotype databases. However, existing resources suffer from problems such as small number of animals, lack of updating, web interface queries limitations and lack of standardized metadata. The Rat Genome Database (RGD) PhenoMiner tool has provided the first step in this effort by standardizing and integrating data from individual studies. Our work, mainly utilizing data curated in RGD, involves the following key steps: (i) we developed a meta-analysis pipeline to automatically integrate data from heterogeneous sources and to produce expected ranges (standardized phenotype ranges) for different strains and phenotypes under different experimental conditions; (ii) we created tools to visualize expected ranges for individual strains and strain groups. We developed a meta-analysis pipeline and an interactive web interface that summarizes and visualizes expected ranges produced from the meta-analysis pipeline. Automation of the pipeline allows for updates as additional data becomes available. The interactive web interface provides curators and researchers with a platform for identifying and validating expected ranges for a variety of quantitative phenotypes. The data analysis result and visualization tools will promote an understanding of rat disease models, guide researchers to choose optimal strains for their research needs and encourage data sharing from different research hubs. Such resources also help to promote research reproducibility. The interactive platforms created in this project will continue to provide a valuable resource for translational research efforts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6444380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64443802019-04-05 Quantitative phenotype analysis to identify, validate and compare rat disease models Zhao, Yiqing Smith, Jennifer R Wang, Shur-Jen Dwinell, Melinda R Shimoyama, Mary Database (Oxford) Original Article The laboratory rat has been widely used as an animal model in biomedical research. There are many strains exhibiting a wide variety of phenotypes. Capturing these phenotypes in a centralized database provides researchers with an easy method for choosing the appropriate strains for their studies. Existing resources have provided some preliminary work in rat phenotype databases. However, existing resources suffer from problems such as small number of animals, lack of updating, web interface queries limitations and lack of standardized metadata. The Rat Genome Database (RGD) PhenoMiner tool has provided the first step in this effort by standardizing and integrating data from individual studies. Our work, mainly utilizing data curated in RGD, involves the following key steps: (i) we developed a meta-analysis pipeline to automatically integrate data from heterogeneous sources and to produce expected ranges (standardized phenotype ranges) for different strains and phenotypes under different experimental conditions; (ii) we created tools to visualize expected ranges for individual strains and strain groups. We developed a meta-analysis pipeline and an interactive web interface that summarizes and visualizes expected ranges produced from the meta-analysis pipeline. Automation of the pipeline allows for updates as additional data becomes available. The interactive web interface provides curators and researchers with a platform for identifying and validating expected ranges for a variety of quantitative phenotypes. The data analysis result and visualization tools will promote an understanding of rat disease models, guide researchers to choose optimal strains for their research needs and encourage data sharing from different research hubs. Such resources also help to promote research reproducibility. The interactive platforms created in this project will continue to provide a valuable resource for translational research efforts. Oxford University Press 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6444380/ /pubmed/30938777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baz037 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhao, Yiqing
Smith, Jennifer R
Wang, Shur-Jen
Dwinell, Melinda R
Shimoyama, Mary
Quantitative phenotype analysis to identify, validate and compare rat disease models
title Quantitative phenotype analysis to identify, validate and compare rat disease models
title_full Quantitative phenotype analysis to identify, validate and compare rat disease models
title_fullStr Quantitative phenotype analysis to identify, validate and compare rat disease models
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative phenotype analysis to identify, validate and compare rat disease models
title_short Quantitative phenotype analysis to identify, validate and compare rat disease models
title_sort quantitative phenotype analysis to identify, validate and compare rat disease models
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30938777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/baz037
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyiqing quantitativephenotypeanalysistoidentifyvalidateandcompareratdiseasemodels
AT smithjenniferr quantitativephenotypeanalysistoidentifyvalidateandcompareratdiseasemodels
AT wangshurjen quantitativephenotypeanalysistoidentifyvalidateandcompareratdiseasemodels
AT dwinellmelindar quantitativephenotypeanalysistoidentifyvalidateandcompareratdiseasemodels
AT shimoyamamary quantitativephenotypeanalysistoidentifyvalidateandcompareratdiseasemodels