Cargando…
Implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership programme in England: experiences of key health professionals explored through trial parallel process evaluation
BACKGROUND: The Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) programme was introduced to support young first-time mothers. A randomised trial found FNP added little short-term benefit compared to usual care. The study included a comprehensive parallel process evaluation, including focus groups, conducted to aid u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0338-y |
_version_ | 1783408022061580288 |
---|---|
author | Sanders, J. Channon, Sue Gobat, Nina Bennert, Kristina Addison, Katy Robling, Mike |
author_facet | Sanders, J. Channon, Sue Gobat, Nina Bennert, Kristina Addison, Katy Robling, Mike |
author_sort | Sanders, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) programme was introduced to support young first-time mothers. A randomised trial found FNP added little short-term benefit compared to usual care. The study included a comprehensive parallel process evaluation, including focus groups, conducted to aid understanding of the introduction of the programme into a new service and social context. The aim of the focus groups was to investigate views of key health professionals towards the integration and delivery of FNP programme in England. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted separately with Family Nurses, Health Visitors and Midwives at trial sites during 2011–2012. Transcripts from audio-recordings were analysed thematically. RESULTS: A total of 122 professionals participated in one of 19 focus groups. Family Nurses were confident in the effectiveness of FNP, although they experienced practical difficulties meeting programme fidelity targets and considered that programme goals did not sufficiently reflect client or community priorities. Health Visitors and Midwives regarded FNP as well-resourced and beneficial to clients, describing their own services as undervalued and struggling. They wished to work closely with Family Nurses, but felt excluded from doing so by practical barriers and programme protection. CONCLUSION: FNP was described as well-resourced and delivered by highly motivated and well supported Family Nurses. FNP eligibility, content and outcomes conflicted with individual client and community priorities. These factors may have restricted the potential effectiveness of a programme developed and previously tested in a different social milieu. Building Blocks ISRCTN23019866 Registered 20/04/2009. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6444391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64443912019-04-11 Implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership programme in England: experiences of key health professionals explored through trial parallel process evaluation Sanders, J. Channon, Sue Gobat, Nina Bennert, Kristina Addison, Katy Robling, Mike BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: The Family Nurse Partnership (FNP) programme was introduced to support young first-time mothers. A randomised trial found FNP added little short-term benefit compared to usual care. The study included a comprehensive parallel process evaluation, including focus groups, conducted to aid understanding of the introduction of the programme into a new service and social context. The aim of the focus groups was to investigate views of key health professionals towards the integration and delivery of FNP programme in England. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted separately with Family Nurses, Health Visitors and Midwives at trial sites during 2011–2012. Transcripts from audio-recordings were analysed thematically. RESULTS: A total of 122 professionals participated in one of 19 focus groups. Family Nurses were confident in the effectiveness of FNP, although they experienced practical difficulties meeting programme fidelity targets and considered that programme goals did not sufficiently reflect client or community priorities. Health Visitors and Midwives regarded FNP as well-resourced and beneficial to clients, describing their own services as undervalued and struggling. They wished to work closely with Family Nurses, but felt excluded from doing so by practical barriers and programme protection. CONCLUSION: FNP was described as well-resourced and delivered by highly motivated and well supported Family Nurses. FNP eligibility, content and outcomes conflicted with individual client and community priorities. These factors may have restricted the potential effectiveness of a programme developed and previously tested in a different social milieu. Building Blocks ISRCTN23019866 Registered 20/04/2009. BioMed Central 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6444391/ /pubmed/30976196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0338-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sanders, J. Channon, Sue Gobat, Nina Bennert, Kristina Addison, Katy Robling, Mike Implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership programme in England: experiences of key health professionals explored through trial parallel process evaluation |
title | Implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership programme in England: experiences of key health professionals explored through trial parallel process evaluation |
title_full | Implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership programme in England: experiences of key health professionals explored through trial parallel process evaluation |
title_fullStr | Implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership programme in England: experiences of key health professionals explored through trial parallel process evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership programme in England: experiences of key health professionals explored through trial parallel process evaluation |
title_short | Implementation of the Family Nurse Partnership programme in England: experiences of key health professionals explored through trial parallel process evaluation |
title_sort | implementation of the family nurse partnership programme in england: experiences of key health professionals explored through trial parallel process evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976196 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0338-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandersj implementationofthefamilynursepartnershipprogrammeinenglandexperiencesofkeyhealthprofessionalsexploredthroughtrialparallelprocessevaluation AT channonsue implementationofthefamilynursepartnershipprogrammeinenglandexperiencesofkeyhealthprofessionalsexploredthroughtrialparallelprocessevaluation AT gobatnina implementationofthefamilynursepartnershipprogrammeinenglandexperiencesofkeyhealthprofessionalsexploredthroughtrialparallelprocessevaluation AT bennertkristina implementationofthefamilynursepartnershipprogrammeinenglandexperiencesofkeyhealthprofessionalsexploredthroughtrialparallelprocessevaluation AT addisonkaty implementationofthefamilynursepartnershipprogrammeinenglandexperiencesofkeyhealthprofessionalsexploredthroughtrialparallelprocessevaluation AT roblingmike implementationofthefamilynursepartnershipprogrammeinenglandexperiencesofkeyhealthprofessionalsexploredthroughtrialparallelprocessevaluation |