Cargando…
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate the efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LiESWT) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287219838364 |
_version_ | 1783408024393613312 |
---|---|
author | Campbell, Jeffrey D. Trock, Bruce J. Oppenheim, Adam R. Anusionwu, Ifeanyichukwu Gor, Ronak A. Burnett, Arthur L. |
author_facet | Campbell, Jeffrey D. Trock, Bruce J. Oppenheim, Adam R. Anusionwu, Ifeanyichukwu Gor, Ronak A. Burnett, Arthur L. |
author_sort | Campbell, Jeffrey D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate the efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LiESWT) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases was performed from November 2005 to July 2018. RCTs evaluating efficacy of LiESWT in the treatment of ED were selected. The primary outcomes were the mean difference between treatment and sham patients in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score 1 month after treatment, and the mean change in IIEF-EF from baseline to 1 month post-treatment. The secondary analysis considered the percentage of men whose erectile hardness score (EHS) changed from <2 at baseline to >3 after treatment. All analyses used a random effects method to pool study-specific results. RESULTS: A total of seven RCTs provided data for 607 patients. The mean IIEF-EF 1 month post-treatment ranged from 12.8 to 22.0 in the treatment group versus 8.17–16.43 in the sham group. The mean difference between the treatment and sham groups at the 1 month follow up was a statistically significant increase in IIEF-EF of 4.23 (p = 0.012). Overall, five of the seven trials provided data on the proportion of patients with baseline EHS <2 who improved to EHS >3 at 1 month post-treatment. The proportions ranged from 3.5 to 90% in the treatment group versus 0–9% in the sham group and the pooled relative risk of EHS improvement for the treated versus sham group was 6.63 (p = 0.0095). No significant adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis that evaluates RCTs exploring LiESWT as a treatment modality strictly for ED. This therapeutic strategy appears to be well tolerated with short-term benefits. However further studies exploring specific treatment regimens and long-term outcomes are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6444401 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64444012019-04-05 Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction Campbell, Jeffrey D. Trock, Bruce J. Oppenheim, Adam R. Anusionwu, Ifeanyichukwu Gor, Ronak A. Burnett, Arthur L. Ther Adv Urol Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate the efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LiESWT) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases was performed from November 2005 to July 2018. RCTs evaluating efficacy of LiESWT in the treatment of ED were selected. The primary outcomes were the mean difference between treatment and sham patients in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain score 1 month after treatment, and the mean change in IIEF-EF from baseline to 1 month post-treatment. The secondary analysis considered the percentage of men whose erectile hardness score (EHS) changed from <2 at baseline to >3 after treatment. All analyses used a random effects method to pool study-specific results. RESULTS: A total of seven RCTs provided data for 607 patients. The mean IIEF-EF 1 month post-treatment ranged from 12.8 to 22.0 in the treatment group versus 8.17–16.43 in the sham group. The mean difference between the treatment and sham groups at the 1 month follow up was a statistically significant increase in IIEF-EF of 4.23 (p = 0.012). Overall, five of the seven trials provided data on the proportion of patients with baseline EHS <2 who improved to EHS >3 at 1 month post-treatment. The proportions ranged from 3.5 to 90% in the treatment group versus 0–9% in the sham group and the pooled relative risk of EHS improvement for the treated versus sham group was 6.63 (p = 0.0095). No significant adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first meta-analysis that evaluates RCTs exploring LiESWT as a treatment modality strictly for ED. This therapeutic strategy appears to be well tolerated with short-term benefits. However further studies exploring specific treatment regimens and long-term outcomes are needed. SAGE Publications 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6444401/ /pubmed/30956690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287219838364 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Campbell, Jeffrey D. Trock, Bruce J. Oppenheim, Adam R. Anusionwu, Ifeanyichukwu Gor, Ronak A. Burnett, Arthur L. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction |
title | Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction |
title_full | Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction |
title_fullStr | Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction |
title_short | Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction |
title_sort | meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that assess the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444401/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756287219838364 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campbelljeffreyd metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatassesstheefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforthetreatmentoferectiledysfunction AT trockbrucej metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatassesstheefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforthetreatmentoferectiledysfunction AT oppenheimadamr metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatassesstheefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforthetreatmentoferectiledysfunction AT anusionwuifeanyichukwu metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatassesstheefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforthetreatmentoferectiledysfunction AT gorronaka metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatassesstheefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforthetreatmentoferectiledysfunction AT burnettarthurl metaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsthatassesstheefficacyoflowintensityshockwavetherapyforthetreatmentoferectiledysfunction |