Cargando…

Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results

We evaluated intra- and interobserver variability of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) due to cine frame selection for 9 coronary stenoses. The projection was selected in advance. Cine frames were selected by 2 blinded experts (blind frame QCA) followed by assignment by supervisor (pre-selecte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ito, Shigenori, Kinoshita, Kanako, Endo, Akiko, Nakamura, Masato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179546819838232
_version_ 1783408082456412160
author Ito, Shigenori
Kinoshita, Kanako
Endo, Akiko
Nakamura, Masato
author_facet Ito, Shigenori
Kinoshita, Kanako
Endo, Akiko
Nakamura, Masato
author_sort Ito, Shigenori
collection PubMed
description We evaluated intra- and interobserver variability of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) due to cine frame selection for 9 coronary stenoses. The projection was selected in advance. Cine frames were selected by 2 blinded experts (blind frame QCA) followed by assignment by supervisor (pre-selected frame QCA). Each expert analyzed 18 frames twice with a 3-month interval. A total of 72 measurements by 2 experts were used for intra- and interobserver variability analysis in calibration factor (CF), minimal lumen diameter (MLD), percent diameter stenosis (%DS), interpolated reference diameter (Int R), and lesion length (LL). Accuracy, precision, and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated based on 2 measurements. For interobserver variability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was evaluated. Regarding intraobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0026 (1.45), 0.220 (25.1), 0.282 (11.0), 7.626 (11.8), and 4.042 (28.7) for blind frame QCA and 0.0044 (2.46), 0.094 (11.2), 0.225 (8.6), 3.924 (5.9), and 1.941 (12.1) for pre-selected frame QCA and regarding interobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0037 (2.09), 0.271 (31.8), 0.307 (11.9), 10.10 (15.4), and 5.121 (39.5) for blind frame QCA and 0.0050 (2.82), 0.098 (11.4), 0.246 (9.5), 5.253 (8.0), and 2.857 (19.0) for pre-selected frame QCA in CF, MLD, Int R, %DS, and LL, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient of Int R was almost perfect in blind and pre-selected frame QCA. Intraclass correlation coefficient of MLD, %DS, and LL were substantial/lower by blind frame QCA and improved to almost perfect by pre-selected frame QCA. Blind cine film selection might affect intra- and interobserver variability, especially in MLD and LL. In the multiple linear regression analysis, blind frame QCA was selected as an explanatory factor of QCA variability in MLD, %DS, and LL. The error range due to frame selection must be taken into consideration in clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6444776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64447762019-04-09 Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results Ito, Shigenori Kinoshita, Kanako Endo, Akiko Nakamura, Masato Clin Med Insights Cardiol Original Research We evaluated intra- and interobserver variability of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) due to cine frame selection for 9 coronary stenoses. The projection was selected in advance. Cine frames were selected by 2 blinded experts (blind frame QCA) followed by assignment by supervisor (pre-selected frame QCA). Each expert analyzed 18 frames twice with a 3-month interval. A total of 72 measurements by 2 experts were used for intra- and interobserver variability analysis in calibration factor (CF), minimal lumen diameter (MLD), percent diameter stenosis (%DS), interpolated reference diameter (Int R), and lesion length (LL). Accuracy, precision, and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated based on 2 measurements. For interobserver variability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was evaluated. Regarding intraobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0026 (1.45), 0.220 (25.1), 0.282 (11.0), 7.626 (11.8), and 4.042 (28.7) for blind frame QCA and 0.0044 (2.46), 0.094 (11.2), 0.225 (8.6), 3.924 (5.9), and 1.941 (12.1) for pre-selected frame QCA and regarding interobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0037 (2.09), 0.271 (31.8), 0.307 (11.9), 10.10 (15.4), and 5.121 (39.5) for blind frame QCA and 0.0050 (2.82), 0.098 (11.4), 0.246 (9.5), 5.253 (8.0), and 2.857 (19.0) for pre-selected frame QCA in CF, MLD, Int R, %DS, and LL, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient of Int R was almost perfect in blind and pre-selected frame QCA. Intraclass correlation coefficient of MLD, %DS, and LL were substantial/lower by blind frame QCA and improved to almost perfect by pre-selected frame QCA. Blind cine film selection might affect intra- and interobserver variability, especially in MLD and LL. In the multiple linear regression analysis, blind frame QCA was selected as an explanatory factor of QCA variability in MLD, %DS, and LL. The error range due to frame selection must be taken into consideration in clinical use. SAGE Publications 2019-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6444776/ /pubmed/30967747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179546819838232 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ito, Shigenori
Kinoshita, Kanako
Endo, Akiko
Nakamura, Masato
Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results
title Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results
title_full Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results
title_fullStr Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results
title_short Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results
title_sort impact of cine frame selection on quantitative coronary angiography results
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179546819838232
work_keys_str_mv AT itoshigenori impactofcineframeselectiononquantitativecoronaryangiographyresults
AT kinoshitakanako impactofcineframeselectiononquantitativecoronaryangiographyresults
AT endoakiko impactofcineframeselectiononquantitativecoronaryangiographyresults
AT nakamuramasato impactofcineframeselectiononquantitativecoronaryangiographyresults