Cargando…
Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results
We evaluated intra- and interobserver variability of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) due to cine frame selection for 9 coronary stenoses. The projection was selected in advance. Cine frames were selected by 2 blinded experts (blind frame QCA) followed by assignment by supervisor (pre-selecte...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179546819838232 |
_version_ | 1783408082456412160 |
---|---|
author | Ito, Shigenori Kinoshita, Kanako Endo, Akiko Nakamura, Masato |
author_facet | Ito, Shigenori Kinoshita, Kanako Endo, Akiko Nakamura, Masato |
author_sort | Ito, Shigenori |
collection | PubMed |
description | We evaluated intra- and interobserver variability of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) due to cine frame selection for 9 coronary stenoses. The projection was selected in advance. Cine frames were selected by 2 blinded experts (blind frame QCA) followed by assignment by supervisor (pre-selected frame QCA). Each expert analyzed 18 frames twice with a 3-month interval. A total of 72 measurements by 2 experts were used for intra- and interobserver variability analysis in calibration factor (CF), minimal lumen diameter (MLD), percent diameter stenosis (%DS), interpolated reference diameter (Int R), and lesion length (LL). Accuracy, precision, and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated based on 2 measurements. For interobserver variability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was evaluated. Regarding intraobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0026 (1.45), 0.220 (25.1), 0.282 (11.0), 7.626 (11.8), and 4.042 (28.7) for blind frame QCA and 0.0044 (2.46), 0.094 (11.2), 0.225 (8.6), 3.924 (5.9), and 1.941 (12.1) for pre-selected frame QCA and regarding interobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0037 (2.09), 0.271 (31.8), 0.307 (11.9), 10.10 (15.4), and 5.121 (39.5) for blind frame QCA and 0.0050 (2.82), 0.098 (11.4), 0.246 (9.5), 5.253 (8.0), and 2.857 (19.0) for pre-selected frame QCA in CF, MLD, Int R, %DS, and LL, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient of Int R was almost perfect in blind and pre-selected frame QCA. Intraclass correlation coefficient of MLD, %DS, and LL were substantial/lower by blind frame QCA and improved to almost perfect by pre-selected frame QCA. Blind cine film selection might affect intra- and interobserver variability, especially in MLD and LL. In the multiple linear regression analysis, blind frame QCA was selected as an explanatory factor of QCA variability in MLD, %DS, and LL. The error range due to frame selection must be taken into consideration in clinical use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6444776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64447762019-04-09 Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results Ito, Shigenori Kinoshita, Kanako Endo, Akiko Nakamura, Masato Clin Med Insights Cardiol Original Research We evaluated intra- and interobserver variability of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) due to cine frame selection for 9 coronary stenoses. The projection was selected in advance. Cine frames were selected by 2 blinded experts (blind frame QCA) followed by assignment by supervisor (pre-selected frame QCA). Each expert analyzed 18 frames twice with a 3-month interval. A total of 72 measurements by 2 experts were used for intra- and interobserver variability analysis in calibration factor (CF), minimal lumen diameter (MLD), percent diameter stenosis (%DS), interpolated reference diameter (Int R), and lesion length (LL). Accuracy, precision, and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated based on 2 measurements. For interobserver variability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was evaluated. Regarding intraobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0026 (1.45), 0.220 (25.1), 0.282 (11.0), 7.626 (11.8), and 4.042 (28.7) for blind frame QCA and 0.0044 (2.46), 0.094 (11.2), 0.225 (8.6), 3.924 (5.9), and 1.941 (12.1) for pre-selected frame QCA and regarding interobserver variability, precision (CV) was 0.0037 (2.09), 0.271 (31.8), 0.307 (11.9), 10.10 (15.4), and 5.121 (39.5) for blind frame QCA and 0.0050 (2.82), 0.098 (11.4), 0.246 (9.5), 5.253 (8.0), and 2.857 (19.0) for pre-selected frame QCA in CF, MLD, Int R, %DS, and LL, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficient of Int R was almost perfect in blind and pre-selected frame QCA. Intraclass correlation coefficient of MLD, %DS, and LL were substantial/lower by blind frame QCA and improved to almost perfect by pre-selected frame QCA. Blind cine film selection might affect intra- and interobserver variability, especially in MLD and LL. In the multiple linear regression analysis, blind frame QCA was selected as an explanatory factor of QCA variability in MLD, %DS, and LL. The error range due to frame selection must be taken into consideration in clinical use. SAGE Publications 2019-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6444776/ /pubmed/30967747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179546819838232 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Ito, Shigenori Kinoshita, Kanako Endo, Akiko Nakamura, Masato Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography Results |
title | Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography
Results |
title_full | Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography
Results |
title_fullStr | Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography
Results |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography
Results |
title_short | Impact of Cine Frame Selection on Quantitative Coronary Angiography
Results |
title_sort | impact of cine frame selection on quantitative coronary angiography
results |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179546819838232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT itoshigenori impactofcineframeselectiononquantitativecoronaryangiographyresults AT kinoshitakanako impactofcineframeselectiononquantitativecoronaryangiographyresults AT endoakiko impactofcineframeselectiononquantitativecoronaryangiographyresults AT nakamuramasato impactofcineframeselectiononquantitativecoronaryangiographyresults |