Cargando…
Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a task-based weight management group programme
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a rising global threat to health and a major contributor to health inequalities. Weight management programmes that are effective, economical and reach underprivileged groups are needed. We examined whether a multi-modal group intervention structured to cater for clients from d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6679-3 |
_version_ | 1783408092965240832 |
---|---|
author | McRobbie, Hayden Hajek, Peter Peerbux, Sarrah Kahan, Brennan C. Eldridge, Sandra Trépel, Dominic Parrott, Steve Griffiths, Chris Snuggs, Sarah Smith, Katie Myers |
author_facet | McRobbie, Hayden Hajek, Peter Peerbux, Sarrah Kahan, Brennan C. Eldridge, Sandra Trépel, Dominic Parrott, Steve Griffiths, Chris Snuggs, Sarah Smith, Katie Myers |
author_sort | McRobbie, Hayden |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Obesity is a rising global threat to health and a major contributor to health inequalities. Weight management programmes that are effective, economical and reach underprivileged groups are needed. We examined whether a multi-modal group intervention structured to cater for clients from disadvantaged communities (Weight Action Programme; WAP) has better one-year outcomes than a primary care standard weight management intervention delivered by practice nurses (PNI). METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, 330 obese adults were recruited from general practices in London and allocated (2:1) to WAP (N = 221) delivered over eight weekly group sessions or PNI (N = 109) who received four sessions over eight weeks. Both interventions covered diet, physical activity and self-monitoring. The primary outcome was the change in weight from baseline at 12 months. To indicate value to the NHS, a cost effectiveness analysis estimated group differences in cost and Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) related to WAP. RESULTS: Participants were recruited from September 2012 to January 2014 with follow-up completed in February 2015. Most participants were not in paid employment and 60% were from ethnic minorities. 88% of participants in each study arm provided at least one recorded outcome and were included in the primary analysis. Compared with the PNI, WAP was associated with greater weight loss overall (− 4·2 kg vs. − 2·3 kg; difference = − 1·9 kg, 95% CI: -3·7 to − 0·1; P = 0·04) and was more likely to generate a weight loss of at least 5% at 12 months (41% vs. 27%, OR = 14·61 95% CI: 2·32 to 91·96, P = 0·004). With an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £7742/QALY, WAP would be considered highly cost effective compared to PNI. CONCLUSIONS: The task-based programme evaluated in this study can provide a template for an effective and economical approach to weight management that can reach clients from disadvantaged communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN45820471. Registered 12/10/2012 (retrospectively registered). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6679-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6444848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64448482019-04-12 Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a task-based weight management group programme McRobbie, Hayden Hajek, Peter Peerbux, Sarrah Kahan, Brennan C. Eldridge, Sandra Trépel, Dominic Parrott, Steve Griffiths, Chris Snuggs, Sarah Smith, Katie Myers BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Obesity is a rising global threat to health and a major contributor to health inequalities. Weight management programmes that are effective, economical and reach underprivileged groups are needed. We examined whether a multi-modal group intervention structured to cater for clients from disadvantaged communities (Weight Action Programme; WAP) has better one-year outcomes than a primary care standard weight management intervention delivered by practice nurses (PNI). METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, 330 obese adults were recruited from general practices in London and allocated (2:1) to WAP (N = 221) delivered over eight weekly group sessions or PNI (N = 109) who received four sessions over eight weeks. Both interventions covered diet, physical activity and self-monitoring. The primary outcome was the change in weight from baseline at 12 months. To indicate value to the NHS, a cost effectiveness analysis estimated group differences in cost and Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) related to WAP. RESULTS: Participants were recruited from September 2012 to January 2014 with follow-up completed in February 2015. Most participants were not in paid employment and 60% were from ethnic minorities. 88% of participants in each study arm provided at least one recorded outcome and were included in the primary analysis. Compared with the PNI, WAP was associated with greater weight loss overall (− 4·2 kg vs. − 2·3 kg; difference = − 1·9 kg, 95% CI: -3·7 to − 0·1; P = 0·04) and was more likely to generate a weight loss of at least 5% at 12 months (41% vs. 27%, OR = 14·61 95% CI: 2·32 to 91·96, P = 0·004). With an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £7742/QALY, WAP would be considered highly cost effective compared to PNI. CONCLUSIONS: The task-based programme evaluated in this study can provide a template for an effective and economical approach to weight management that can reach clients from disadvantaged communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN ISRCTN45820471. Registered 12/10/2012 (retrospectively registered). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6679-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6444848/ /pubmed/30940108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6679-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article McRobbie, Hayden Hajek, Peter Peerbux, Sarrah Kahan, Brennan C. Eldridge, Sandra Trépel, Dominic Parrott, Steve Griffiths, Chris Snuggs, Sarah Smith, Katie Myers Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a task-based weight management group programme |
title | Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a task-based weight management group programme |
title_full | Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a task-based weight management group programme |
title_fullStr | Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a task-based weight management group programme |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a task-based weight management group programme |
title_short | Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a task-based weight management group programme |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a task-based weight management group programme |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444848/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6679-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcrobbiehayden randomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofataskbasedweightmanagementgroupprogramme AT hajekpeter randomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofataskbasedweightmanagementgroupprogramme AT peerbuxsarrah randomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofataskbasedweightmanagementgroupprogramme AT kahanbrennanc randomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofataskbasedweightmanagementgroupprogramme AT eldridgesandra randomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofataskbasedweightmanagementgroupprogramme AT trepeldominic randomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofataskbasedweightmanagementgroupprogramme AT parrottsteve randomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofataskbasedweightmanagementgroupprogramme AT griffithschris randomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofataskbasedweightmanagementgroupprogramme AT snuggssarah randomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofataskbasedweightmanagementgroupprogramme AT smithkatiemyers randomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluationofataskbasedweightmanagementgroupprogramme |