Cargando…

Peritubal Infiltration of Fentanyl Compared to Dexmedetomidine with Ropivacaine in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Comparative Analysis

CONTEXT: Dexmedetomidine has been found as an effective adjuvant in various nerve blocks. Despite several studies on dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine, there is no study on comparing with fentanyl in peritubal infiltration in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). AIMS: The aim of this study was to com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soni, Sumit, Parmar, Kalpesh, Charan, Shyam Meena, Sethi, Sameer, Naik, Naveen B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031471
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_1_19
_version_ 1783408104825683968
author Soni, Sumit
Parmar, Kalpesh
Charan, Shyam Meena
Sethi, Sameer
Naik, Naveen B.
author_facet Soni, Sumit
Parmar, Kalpesh
Charan, Shyam Meena
Sethi, Sameer
Naik, Naveen B.
author_sort Soni, Sumit
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Dexmedetomidine has been found as an effective adjuvant in various nerve blocks. Despite several studies on dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine, there is no study on comparing with fentanyl in peritubal infiltration in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the addition of dexmedetomidine or fentanyl in peritubal local anesthetic infiltration on pain scores and analgesic consumption in patients who underwent PCNL. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, tertiary care center-based study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I, II, and III patients were selected and randomly divided into two groups: Group RF ropivacaine and fentanyl (n = 30) and Group RD ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine (n = 30). Balanced general anesthesia was given. After completion of the surgery, peritubal infiltration was given at 6 and 12 O’clock positions under fluoroscopic guidance. Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale and dynamic visual analog scale rating 0–10 for initial 48 h. Postoperative sedation was assessed using five-point sedation score. Time to first rescue analgesic, number of doses of tramadol, and total consumption of tramadol required in 48 h were noted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Descriptive data were expressed in mean and standard deviation for between-group comparisons; the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables, whereas t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test were used to compare continuous variables between two groups. RESULTS: Duration of analgesia in group RD (12.87 ± 3.85) is more prolonged than group RF (8.13 ± 3.28) h. Total dose of rescue analgesia required in 48 h in group RF was higher as compared to group RD. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine is more effective than fentanyl in terms of prolongation of analgesic efficacy of local anesthetic in peritubal block along with short-lived mild sedation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6444944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64449442019-04-26 Peritubal Infiltration of Fentanyl Compared to Dexmedetomidine with Ropivacaine in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Comparative Analysis Soni, Sumit Parmar, Kalpesh Charan, Shyam Meena Sethi, Sameer Naik, Naveen B. Anesth Essays Res Original Article CONTEXT: Dexmedetomidine has been found as an effective adjuvant in various nerve blocks. Despite several studies on dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine, there is no study on comparing with fentanyl in peritubal infiltration in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the addition of dexmedetomidine or fentanyl in peritubal local anesthetic infiltration on pain scores and analgesic consumption in patients who underwent PCNL. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, tertiary care center-based study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 60 American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I, II, and III patients were selected and randomly divided into two groups: Group RF ropivacaine and fentanyl (n = 30) and Group RD ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine (n = 30). Balanced general anesthesia was given. After completion of the surgery, peritubal infiltration was given at 6 and 12 O’clock positions under fluoroscopic guidance. Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale and dynamic visual analog scale rating 0–10 for initial 48 h. Postoperative sedation was assessed using five-point sedation score. Time to first rescue analgesic, number of doses of tramadol, and total consumption of tramadol required in 48 h were noted. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Descriptive data were expressed in mean and standard deviation for between-group comparisons; the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables, whereas t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test were used to compare continuous variables between two groups. RESULTS: Duration of analgesia in group RD (12.87 ± 3.85) is more prolonged than group RF (8.13 ± 3.28) h. Total dose of rescue analgesia required in 48 h in group RF was higher as compared to group RD. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine is more effective than fentanyl in terms of prolongation of analgesic efficacy of local anesthetic in peritubal block along with short-lived mild sedation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6444944/ /pubmed/31031471 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_1_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Soni, Sumit
Parmar, Kalpesh
Charan, Shyam Meena
Sethi, Sameer
Naik, Naveen B.
Peritubal Infiltration of Fentanyl Compared to Dexmedetomidine with Ropivacaine in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Comparative Analysis
title Peritubal Infiltration of Fentanyl Compared to Dexmedetomidine with Ropivacaine in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Comparative Analysis
title_full Peritubal Infiltration of Fentanyl Compared to Dexmedetomidine with Ropivacaine in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Comparative Analysis
title_fullStr Peritubal Infiltration of Fentanyl Compared to Dexmedetomidine with Ropivacaine in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Comparative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Peritubal Infiltration of Fentanyl Compared to Dexmedetomidine with Ropivacaine in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Comparative Analysis
title_short Peritubal Infiltration of Fentanyl Compared to Dexmedetomidine with Ropivacaine in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Comparative Analysis
title_sort peritubal infiltration of fentanyl compared to dexmedetomidine with ropivacaine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized comparative analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6444944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031471
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_1_19
work_keys_str_mv AT sonisumit peritubalinfiltrationoffentanylcomparedtodexmedetomidinewithropivacaineinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyarandomizedcomparativeanalysis
AT parmarkalpesh peritubalinfiltrationoffentanylcomparedtodexmedetomidinewithropivacaineinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyarandomizedcomparativeanalysis
AT charanshyammeena peritubalinfiltrationoffentanylcomparedtodexmedetomidinewithropivacaineinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyarandomizedcomparativeanalysis
AT sethisameer peritubalinfiltrationoffentanylcomparedtodexmedetomidinewithropivacaineinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyarandomizedcomparativeanalysis
AT naiknaveenb peritubalinfiltrationoffentanylcomparedtodexmedetomidinewithropivacaineinpercutaneousnephrolithotomyarandomizedcomparativeanalysis