Cargando…
Humans best judge how much to cooperate when facing hard problems in large groups
We report the results of a game-theoretic experiment with human players who solve problems of increasing complexity by cooperating in groups of increasing size. Our experimental environment is set up to make it complicated for players to use rational calculation for making the cooperative decisions....
Autores principales: | Guazzini, Andrea, Stefanelli, Federica, Imbimbo, Enrico, Vilone, Daniele, Bagnoli, Franco, Levnajić, Zoran |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41773-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Modeling crowdsourcing as collective problem solving
por: Guazzini, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Corrigendum: Modeling crowdsourcing as collective problem solving
por: Guazzini, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Measuring psychosocial outcomes: is the consumer or the professional the best judge?
por: Paul, C, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Evolutionary advantages of turning points in human cooperative behaviour
por: Vilone, Daniele, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Saccades Follow Perception When Judging Location
por: Yildirim, Funda, et al.
Publicado: (2015)