Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty in preventing the adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes in prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter studies
OBJECTIVES: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become an alternative treatment for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This technique preserves appropriate motion at both the index and adjacent disc levels and consequently may prevent adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). The authors performed a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30992666 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S196349 |
_version_ | 1783408163679109120 |
---|---|
author | Latka, Dariusz Kozlowska, Klaudia Miekisiak, Grzegorz Latka, Kajetan Chowaniec, Jacek Olbrycht, Tomasz Latka, Miroslaw |
author_facet | Latka, Dariusz Kozlowska, Klaudia Miekisiak, Grzegorz Latka, Kajetan Chowaniec, Jacek Olbrycht, Tomasz Latka, Miroslaw |
author_sort | Latka, Dariusz |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become an alternative treatment for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This technique preserves appropriate motion at both the index and adjacent disc levels and consequently may prevent adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). The authors performed a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of CDA to those of the gold standard, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Both surgical and clinical parameters were employed to verify the hypothesis that CDA can reduce the risk of ASD. METHODS: The meta-analysis comprised high-quality randomized controlled trials that compared CDA and ACDF treatments of cervical degenerative disc disease. Included papers reported data for at least one of the following outcomes: 1) surgical parameters, 2) questionnaire clinical indices (pre- and postoperative values), and 3) complication rates at 24 months; in addition, for ASD we analyzed 60 month or longer follow-ups. We used mean differences (MDs) or ORs to compare treatment effects between CDA and ACDF. RESULTS: Twenty studies with 3,656 patients (2,140 with CDA and 1,516 with ACDF) met the inclusion criteria. CDA surgery, with mean duration longer than that of ACDF, was associated with higher blood loss. Visual analog scale neck pain score was significantly smaller for CDA (mean difference =−2.30, 95% CI [−3.72; −0.87], P=0.002). The frequency of dysphagia/dysphonia (OR =0.69, 95% CI [0.49; 0.98], P=0.04) as well as the long-term ASD rate for CDA was significantly smaller (OR =0.33, 95% CI [0.21; 0.50], P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: A significantly lower probability of ASD reoperations in the CDA cohort after a 60-month or longer follow-up was the most important finding of this study. Despite the moderate quality of this evidence, the pooled data corroborated for the very first time that CDA was efficacious in preventing ASD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6445235 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64452352019-04-16 Safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty in preventing the adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes in prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter studies Latka, Dariusz Kozlowska, Klaudia Miekisiak, Grzegorz Latka, Kajetan Chowaniec, Jacek Olbrycht, Tomasz Latka, Miroslaw Ther Clin Risk Manag Review OBJECTIVES: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become an alternative treatment for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This technique preserves appropriate motion at both the index and adjacent disc levels and consequently may prevent adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). The authors performed a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of CDA to those of the gold standard, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Both surgical and clinical parameters were employed to verify the hypothesis that CDA can reduce the risk of ASD. METHODS: The meta-analysis comprised high-quality randomized controlled trials that compared CDA and ACDF treatments of cervical degenerative disc disease. Included papers reported data for at least one of the following outcomes: 1) surgical parameters, 2) questionnaire clinical indices (pre- and postoperative values), and 3) complication rates at 24 months; in addition, for ASD we analyzed 60 month or longer follow-ups. We used mean differences (MDs) or ORs to compare treatment effects between CDA and ACDF. RESULTS: Twenty studies with 3,656 patients (2,140 with CDA and 1,516 with ACDF) met the inclusion criteria. CDA surgery, with mean duration longer than that of ACDF, was associated with higher blood loss. Visual analog scale neck pain score was significantly smaller for CDA (mean difference =−2.30, 95% CI [−3.72; −0.87], P=0.002). The frequency of dysphagia/dysphonia (OR =0.69, 95% CI [0.49; 0.98], P=0.04) as well as the long-term ASD rate for CDA was significantly smaller (OR =0.33, 95% CI [0.21; 0.50], P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: A significantly lower probability of ASD reoperations in the CDA cohort after a 60-month or longer follow-up was the most important finding of this study. Despite the moderate quality of this evidence, the pooled data corroborated for the very first time that CDA was efficacious in preventing ASD. Dove Medical Press 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6445235/ /pubmed/30992666 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S196349 Text en © 2019 Latka et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Latka, Dariusz Kozlowska, Klaudia Miekisiak, Grzegorz Latka, Kajetan Chowaniec, Jacek Olbrycht, Tomasz Latka, Miroslaw Safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty in preventing the adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes in prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter studies |
title | Safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty in preventing the adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes in prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter studies |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty in preventing the adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes in prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter studies |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty in preventing the adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes in prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty in preventing the adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes in prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter studies |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty in preventing the adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes in prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter studies |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty in preventing the adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes in prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter studies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30992666 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S196349 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT latkadariusz safetyandefficacyofcervicaldiscarthroplastyinpreventingtheadjacentsegmentdiseaseametaanalysisofmidtolongtermoutcomesinprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudies AT kozlowskaklaudia safetyandefficacyofcervicaldiscarthroplastyinpreventingtheadjacentsegmentdiseaseametaanalysisofmidtolongtermoutcomesinprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudies AT miekisiakgrzegorz safetyandefficacyofcervicaldiscarthroplastyinpreventingtheadjacentsegmentdiseaseametaanalysisofmidtolongtermoutcomesinprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudies AT latkakajetan safetyandefficacyofcervicaldiscarthroplastyinpreventingtheadjacentsegmentdiseaseametaanalysisofmidtolongtermoutcomesinprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudies AT chowaniecjacek safetyandefficacyofcervicaldiscarthroplastyinpreventingtheadjacentsegmentdiseaseametaanalysisofmidtolongtermoutcomesinprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudies AT olbrychttomasz safetyandefficacyofcervicaldiscarthroplastyinpreventingtheadjacentsegmentdiseaseametaanalysisofmidtolongtermoutcomesinprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudies AT latkamiroslaw safetyandefficacyofcervicaldiscarthroplastyinpreventingtheadjacentsegmentdiseaseametaanalysisofmidtolongtermoutcomesinprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmulticenterstudies |