Cargando…
Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques
OBJECTIVE: The study was built around the objective of determining the variances in the gap and void formation around cemented prefabricated fiber posts with two different cementation materials and techniques with micro-computed tomography (μCT). METHODS: Standardized acrylic resin roots (N = 40) wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.01.001 |
_version_ | 1783408193874952192 |
---|---|
author | ArRejaie, Aws Alsuliman, Saleh A. Aljohani, Mohammed O. Altamimi, Hesham A. Alshwaimi, Emad Al-Thobity, Ahmad M. |
author_facet | ArRejaie, Aws Alsuliman, Saleh A. Aljohani, Mohammed O. Altamimi, Hesham A. Alshwaimi, Emad Al-Thobity, Ahmad M. |
author_sort | ArRejaie, Aws |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The study was built around the objective of determining the variances in the gap and void formation around cemented prefabricated fiber posts with two different cementation materials and techniques with micro-computed tomography (μCT). METHODS: Standardized acrylic resin roots (N = 40) with prefabricated fiber posts (RelyX™ Fiber Post 3D) were split into four sets (n = 10) based on many types of cementation materials and techniques. In the first group, resin cement (RelyX™ Unicem) was inserted to the canals via root canal tips. In the second group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. In the third group, dual polymerizing resin cement (MultiCore® Flow) was injected into the canals by using root canal tips. In the fourth group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. The gap and void formation in the cement and the root canals was evaluated with μCT. IBM SPSS Statistics was used to perform the statistical evaluation, then the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality and Kruskal-Wallis H test to compare these variables with respect to the all groups significant difference (a = 0.05). RESULTS: The study outlined no difference of significance when evaluating the gap and void formation within the experimental groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was a certain amount of void and gap formation inside all of the tested specimens. However, no significant variances were found. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6445436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64454362019-04-12 Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques ArRejaie, Aws Alsuliman, Saleh A. Aljohani, Mohammed O. Altamimi, Hesham A. Alshwaimi, Emad Al-Thobity, Ahmad M. Saudi Dent J Article OBJECTIVE: The study was built around the objective of determining the variances in the gap and void formation around cemented prefabricated fiber posts with two different cementation materials and techniques with micro-computed tomography (μCT). METHODS: Standardized acrylic resin roots (N = 40) with prefabricated fiber posts (RelyX™ Fiber Post 3D) were split into four sets (n = 10) based on many types of cementation materials and techniques. In the first group, resin cement (RelyX™ Unicem) was inserted to the canals via root canal tips. In the second group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. In the third group, dual polymerizing resin cement (MultiCore® Flow) was injected into the canals by using root canal tips. In the fourth group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. The gap and void formation in the cement and the root canals was evaluated with μCT. IBM SPSS Statistics was used to perform the statistical evaluation, then the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality and Kruskal-Wallis H test to compare these variables with respect to the all groups significant difference (a = 0.05). RESULTS: The study outlined no difference of significance when evaluating the gap and void formation within the experimental groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was a certain amount of void and gap formation inside all of the tested specimens. However, no significant variances were found. Elsevier 2019-04 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6445436/ /pubmed/30983834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.01.001 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article ArRejaie, Aws Alsuliman, Saleh A. Aljohani, Mohammed O. Altamimi, Hesham A. Alshwaimi, Emad Al-Thobity, Ahmad M. Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques |
title | Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques |
title_full | Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques |
title_fullStr | Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques |
title_short | Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques |
title_sort | micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.01.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arrejaieaws microcomputedtomographyanalysisofgapandvoidformationindifferentprefabricatedfiberpostcementationmaterialsandtechniques AT alsulimansaleha microcomputedtomographyanalysisofgapandvoidformationindifferentprefabricatedfiberpostcementationmaterialsandtechniques AT aljohanimohammedo microcomputedtomographyanalysisofgapandvoidformationindifferentprefabricatedfiberpostcementationmaterialsandtechniques AT altamimiheshama microcomputedtomographyanalysisofgapandvoidformationindifferentprefabricatedfiberpostcementationmaterialsandtechniques AT alshwaimiemad microcomputedtomographyanalysisofgapandvoidformationindifferentprefabricatedfiberpostcementationmaterialsandtechniques AT althobityahmadm microcomputedtomographyanalysisofgapandvoidformationindifferentprefabricatedfiberpostcementationmaterialsandtechniques |