Cargando…

Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques

OBJECTIVE: The study was built around the objective of determining the variances in the gap and void formation around cemented prefabricated fiber posts with two different cementation materials and techniques with micro-computed tomography (μCT). METHODS: Standardized acrylic resin roots (N = 40) wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ArRejaie, Aws, Alsuliman, Saleh A., Aljohani, Mohammed O., Altamimi, Hesham A., Alshwaimi, Emad, Al-Thobity, Ahmad M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.01.001
_version_ 1783408193874952192
author ArRejaie, Aws
Alsuliman, Saleh A.
Aljohani, Mohammed O.
Altamimi, Hesham A.
Alshwaimi, Emad
Al-Thobity, Ahmad M.
author_facet ArRejaie, Aws
Alsuliman, Saleh A.
Aljohani, Mohammed O.
Altamimi, Hesham A.
Alshwaimi, Emad
Al-Thobity, Ahmad M.
author_sort ArRejaie, Aws
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The study was built around the objective of determining the variances in the gap and void formation around cemented prefabricated fiber posts with two different cementation materials and techniques with micro-computed tomography (μCT). METHODS: Standardized acrylic resin roots (N = 40) with prefabricated fiber posts (RelyX™ Fiber Post 3D) were split into four sets (n = 10) based on many types of cementation materials and techniques. In the first group, resin cement (RelyX™ Unicem) was inserted to the canals via root canal tips. In the second group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. In the third group, dual polymerizing resin cement (MultiCore® Flow) was injected into the canals by using root canal tips. In the fourth group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. The gap and void formation in the cement and the root canals was evaluated with μCT. IBM SPSS Statistics was used to perform the statistical evaluation, then the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality and Kruskal-Wallis H test to compare these variables with respect to the all groups significant difference (a = 0.05). RESULTS: The study outlined no difference of significance when evaluating the gap and void formation within the experimental groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was a certain amount of void and gap formation inside all of the tested specimens. However, no significant variances were found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6445436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64454362019-04-12 Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques ArRejaie, Aws Alsuliman, Saleh A. Aljohani, Mohammed O. Altamimi, Hesham A. Alshwaimi, Emad Al-Thobity, Ahmad M. Saudi Dent J Article OBJECTIVE: The study was built around the objective of determining the variances in the gap and void formation around cemented prefabricated fiber posts with two different cementation materials and techniques with micro-computed tomography (μCT). METHODS: Standardized acrylic resin roots (N = 40) with prefabricated fiber posts (RelyX™ Fiber Post 3D) were split into four sets (n = 10) based on many types of cementation materials and techniques. In the first group, resin cement (RelyX™ Unicem) was inserted to the canals via root canal tips. In the second group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. In the third group, dual polymerizing resin cement (MultiCore® Flow) was injected into the canals by using root canal tips. In the fourth group, the same cement was injected, and a microbrush was used to distribute the cement inside the canal. The gap and void formation in the cement and the root canals was evaluated with μCT. IBM SPSS Statistics was used to perform the statistical evaluation, then the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of normality and Kruskal-Wallis H test to compare these variables with respect to the all groups significant difference (a = 0.05). RESULTS: The study outlined no difference of significance when evaluating the gap and void formation within the experimental groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was a certain amount of void and gap formation inside all of the tested specimens. However, no significant variances were found. Elsevier 2019-04 2019-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6445436/ /pubmed/30983834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.01.001 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
ArRejaie, Aws
Alsuliman, Saleh A.
Aljohani, Mohammed O.
Altamimi, Hesham A.
Alshwaimi, Emad
Al-Thobity, Ahmad M.
Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques
title Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques
title_full Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques
title_fullStr Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques
title_full_unstemmed Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques
title_short Micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques
title_sort micro-computed tomography analysis of gap and void formation in different prefabricated fiber post cementation materials and techniques
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT arrejaieaws microcomputedtomographyanalysisofgapandvoidformationindifferentprefabricatedfiberpostcementationmaterialsandtechniques
AT alsulimansaleha microcomputedtomographyanalysisofgapandvoidformationindifferentprefabricatedfiberpostcementationmaterialsandtechniques
AT aljohanimohammedo microcomputedtomographyanalysisofgapandvoidformationindifferentprefabricatedfiberpostcementationmaterialsandtechniques
AT altamimiheshama microcomputedtomographyanalysisofgapandvoidformationindifferentprefabricatedfiberpostcementationmaterialsandtechniques
AT alshwaimiemad microcomputedtomographyanalysisofgapandvoidformationindifferentprefabricatedfiberpostcementationmaterialsandtechniques
AT althobityahmadm microcomputedtomographyanalysisofgapandvoidformationindifferentprefabricatedfiberpostcementationmaterialsandtechniques