Cargando…

Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry – A systematic review

PURPOSE: Space Maintainers have long been used for the management of space loss in primary and mixed dentition, but there is a need to have an evidence based approach when selecting the most appropriate space maintainer for space management in children. This systematic review aimed to assess the sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramakrishnan, Mahesh, Dhanalakshmi, R., Subramanian, E.M.G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.02.037
_version_ 1783408196460740608
author Ramakrishnan, Mahesh
Dhanalakshmi, R.
Subramanian, E.M.G.
author_facet Ramakrishnan, Mahesh
Dhanalakshmi, R.
Subramanian, E.M.G.
author_sort Ramakrishnan, Mahesh
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Space Maintainers have long been used for the management of space loss in primary and mixed dentition, but there is a need to have an evidence based approach when selecting the most appropriate space maintainer for space management in children. This systematic review aimed to assess the survival rate of space maintainers in children. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted until October 2017 using PubMed, Scopus, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify peer- reviewed papers published in English. Search keywords and MeSH headings include “primary dentition” and “Fixed Space maintainers”. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies conducted in children less than 12 years of age, who required unilateral or bilateral fixed space maintainer. Retrieved papers were evaluated by four reviewers independently to assess suitability for inclusion in the systematic review and the final decision was made by consensus. Qualities of the included studies were assessed using Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research by Oxford Academics and data were extracted for analysis. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 39 papers for screening after removal of duplicate articles. Among the retrieved studies, 23 papers did not satisfy the study inclusion criteria. Consequently, 16 full text articles were retrieved and reviewed. Finally, those 11 papers which fulfilled all the inclusion criteria were selected and reviewed systematically. Most of the clinical trials were assessed as having moderate and low risk of bias. CONCLUSION: There is a wide variation in the survival rate of metal based and resin based space maintainers and also within the metal based space maintainers. There is an inadequate evidence to recommend one best fixed space maintainer due to lack of properly designed studies. Hence, clinical trial comparing different types of metal based space maintainer and resin based space maintainer with longer duration of follow-up must be performed to evaluate its survival rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6445447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64454472019-04-12 Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry – A systematic review Ramakrishnan, Mahesh Dhanalakshmi, R. Subramanian, E.M.G. Saudi Dent J Review Article PURPOSE: Space Maintainers have long been used for the management of space loss in primary and mixed dentition, but there is a need to have an evidence based approach when selecting the most appropriate space maintainer for space management in children. This systematic review aimed to assess the survival rate of space maintainers in children. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted until October 2017 using PubMed, Scopus, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases to identify peer- reviewed papers published in English. Search keywords and MeSH headings include “primary dentition” and “Fixed Space maintainers”. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies conducted in children less than 12 years of age, who required unilateral or bilateral fixed space maintainer. Retrieved papers were evaluated by four reviewers independently to assess suitability for inclusion in the systematic review and the final decision was made by consensus. Qualities of the included studies were assessed using Quality of Reporting of Observational Longitudinal Research by Oxford Academics and data were extracted for analysis. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 39 papers for screening after removal of duplicate articles. Among the retrieved studies, 23 papers did not satisfy the study inclusion criteria. Consequently, 16 full text articles were retrieved and reviewed. Finally, those 11 papers which fulfilled all the inclusion criteria were selected and reviewed systematically. Most of the clinical trials were assessed as having moderate and low risk of bias. CONCLUSION: There is a wide variation in the survival rate of metal based and resin based space maintainers and also within the metal based space maintainers. There is an inadequate evidence to recommend one best fixed space maintainer due to lack of properly designed studies. Hence, clinical trial comparing different types of metal based space maintainer and resin based space maintainer with longer duration of follow-up must be performed to evaluate its survival rate. Elsevier 2019-04 2019-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6445447/ /pubmed/30983825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.02.037 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Ramakrishnan, Mahesh
Dhanalakshmi, R.
Subramanian, E.M.G.
Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry – A systematic review
title Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry – A systematic review
title_full Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry – A systematic review
title_fullStr Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry – A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry – A systematic review
title_short Survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in Paediatric Dentistry – A systematic review
title_sort survival rate of different fixed posterior space maintainers used in paediatric dentistry – a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.02.037
work_keys_str_mv AT ramakrishnanmahesh survivalrateofdifferentfixedposteriorspacemaintainersusedinpaediatricdentistryasystematicreview
AT dhanalakshmir survivalrateofdifferentfixedposteriorspacemaintainersusedinpaediatricdentistryasystematicreview
AT subramanianemg survivalrateofdifferentfixedposteriorspacemaintainersusedinpaediatricdentistryasystematicreview