Cargando…

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of diabetes: an evidence-based review

The purpose of this study was to review the epidemiological and experimental evidence linking background exposure to a selection of environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) with diabetes and impaired glucose metabolism. The review summarises the literature on both cross-sectional and pros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lind, P. Monica, Lind, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4621-3
_version_ 1783408198888194048
author Lind, P. Monica
Lind, Lars
author_facet Lind, P. Monica
Lind, Lars
author_sort Lind, P. Monica
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to review the epidemiological and experimental evidence linking background exposure to a selection of environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) with diabetes and impaired glucose metabolism. The review summarises the literature on both cross-sectional and prospective studies in humans, as well as experimental in vivo and in vitro studies. The findings were subjected to evidence grading according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) classification. We found >40 cross-sectional and seven prospective studies regarding EDCs and risk of diabetes. Taken together, there is moderate evidence for a relationship between exposure to dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (p,p′-DDE), a metabolite of the pesticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, and diabetes development. Regarding polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), it is likely that the rodent models used are not appropriate, and therefore the evidence is poorer than for p,p′-DDE. For other EDCs, such as bisphenol A, phthalates and perfluorinated chemicals, the evidence is scarce, since very few prospective studies exist. Brominated flame retardants do not seem to be associated with a disturbed glucose tolerance. Thus, evidence is accumulating that EDCs might be involved in diabetes development. Best evidence exists for p,p′-DDE. For other chemicals, both prospective studies and supporting animal data are still lacking. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00125-018-4621-3) contains a slide of the figure for download, which is available to authorised users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6445457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64454572019-04-17 Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of diabetes: an evidence-based review Lind, P. Monica Lind, Lars Diabetologia Review The purpose of this study was to review the epidemiological and experimental evidence linking background exposure to a selection of environmental endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) with diabetes and impaired glucose metabolism. The review summarises the literature on both cross-sectional and prospective studies in humans, as well as experimental in vivo and in vitro studies. The findings were subjected to evidence grading according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) classification. We found >40 cross-sectional and seven prospective studies regarding EDCs and risk of diabetes. Taken together, there is moderate evidence for a relationship between exposure to dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (p,p′-DDE), a metabolite of the pesticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, and diabetes development. Regarding polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), it is likely that the rodent models used are not appropriate, and therefore the evidence is poorer than for p,p′-DDE. For other EDCs, such as bisphenol A, phthalates and perfluorinated chemicals, the evidence is scarce, since very few prospective studies exist. Brominated flame retardants do not seem to be associated with a disturbed glucose tolerance. Thus, evidence is accumulating that EDCs might be involved in diabetes development. Best evidence exists for p,p′-DDE. For other chemicals, both prospective studies and supporting animal data are still lacking. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00125-018-4621-3) contains a slide of the figure for download, which is available to authorised users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-05-09 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6445457/ /pubmed/29744538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4621-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Lind, P. Monica
Lind, Lars
Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of diabetes: an evidence-based review
title Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of diabetes: an evidence-based review
title_full Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of diabetes: an evidence-based review
title_fullStr Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of diabetes: an evidence-based review
title_full_unstemmed Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of diabetes: an evidence-based review
title_short Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of diabetes: an evidence-based review
title_sort endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of diabetes: an evidence-based review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4621-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lindpmonica endocrinedisruptingchemicalsandriskofdiabetesanevidencebasedreview
AT lindlars endocrinedisruptingchemicalsandriskofdiabetesanevidencebasedreview