Rare Mesenchymal Breast Entities that Mimic Malignancy: A Single-institution Experience of a Challenging Diagnosis

Background Benign mesenchymal tumors of the breast are rare and may mimic invasive carcinoma on imaging and morphology, thus becoming clinically challenging for clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists. To improve the understanding of these lesions and to avoid erroneous diagnosis and inappropriate treatment, we report our institution’s experience with seven cases of granular cell tumor (GCT) and myofibroblastoma (MFB) in the past 10 years. Materials and methods Seven cases of benign mesenchymal tumors of the breast were identified at the University of Texas Medical Branch from 2008 to 2018. Breast biopsies were collected from all patients after mammography and ultrasound imaging classified their results as suspicious or highly suggestive of malignancy by the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS ≥ 4A). All cases were reviewed to study the morphologic features and their immunoprofiles. The demographic characteristics, methods of treatment, postoperative pathological results, and follow-up results of the cases were then analyzed and compared to peer-reviewed literature. Results The study consisted of five females and two males with a mean age of 50 years in the GCT patients and 62 years in MFB patients. We identified four cases of GCT and three cases of MFB. The mean tumor size was 1.9 cm. Clinically, five patients presented with a palpable nontender mass, one with breast asymmetry, and one was asymptomatic. All patients underwent imaging studies prior to core needle biopsy. BI-RADS was ≥4B in patients with GCT and 4A-C in MFB. Definitive diagnosis was made by histopathology and confirmed by immunohistochemistry in accordance with the features described in the literature. Six patients underwent wide excision. The mean follow-up duration was 44.5 months. All patients remained well, without recurrence. Conclusions MFB and GCT can mimic malignant neoplasms and the clinical significance of these entities lies primarily in their recognition as distinctive benign neoplasms. The gold standard for the diagnosis of GCT and MFB is histopathology. All the cases in our series were clinically or radiologically mistaken for carcinoma, which has been largely reported in the literature. Pathologists should bear this in mind to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment.