Cargando…
Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change
Receptors alternate between resting↔active conformations that bind agonists with low↔high affinity. Here, we define a new agonist attribute, energy efficiency (η), as the fraction of ligand-binding energy converted into the mechanical work of the activation conformational change. η depends only on t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Rockefeller University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30635369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812215 |
_version_ | 1783408222419288064 |
---|---|
author | Nayak, Tapan K. Vij, Ridhima Bruhova, Iva Shandilya, Jayasha Auerbach, Anthony |
author_facet | Nayak, Tapan K. Vij, Ridhima Bruhova, Iva Shandilya, Jayasha Auerbach, Anthony |
author_sort | Nayak, Tapan K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Receptors alternate between resting↔active conformations that bind agonists with low↔high affinity. Here, we define a new agonist attribute, energy efficiency (η), as the fraction of ligand-binding energy converted into the mechanical work of the activation conformational change. η depends only on the resting/active agonist-binding energy ratio. In a plot of activation energy versus binding energy (an “efficiency” plot), the slope gives η and the y intercept gives the receptor’s intrinsic activation energy (without agonists; ΔG(0)). We used single-channel electrophysiology to estimate η for eight different agonists and ΔG(0) in human endplate acetylcholine receptors (AChRs). From published equilibrium constants, we also estimated η for agonists of K(Ca)1.1 (BK channels) and muscarinic, γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, glycine, and aryl-hydrocarbon receptors, and ΔG(0) for all of these except K(Ca)1.1. Regarding AChRs, η is 48–56% for agonists related structurally to acetylcholine but is only ∼39% for agonists related to epibatidine; ΔG(0) is 8.4 kcal/mol in adult and 9.6 kcal/mol in fetal receptors. Efficiency plots for all of the above receptors are approximately linear, with η values between 12% and 57% and ΔG(0) values between 2 and 12 kcal/mol. Efficiency appears to be a general attribute of agonist action at receptor binding sites that is useful for understanding binding mechanisms, categorizing agonists, and estimating concentration–response relationships. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6445574 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64455742019-10-01 Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change Nayak, Tapan K. Vij, Ridhima Bruhova, Iva Shandilya, Jayasha Auerbach, Anthony J Gen Physiol Research Articles Receptors alternate between resting↔active conformations that bind agonists with low↔high affinity. Here, we define a new agonist attribute, energy efficiency (η), as the fraction of ligand-binding energy converted into the mechanical work of the activation conformational change. η depends only on the resting/active agonist-binding energy ratio. In a plot of activation energy versus binding energy (an “efficiency” plot), the slope gives η and the y intercept gives the receptor’s intrinsic activation energy (without agonists; ΔG(0)). We used single-channel electrophysiology to estimate η for eight different agonists and ΔG(0) in human endplate acetylcholine receptors (AChRs). From published equilibrium constants, we also estimated η for agonists of K(Ca)1.1 (BK channels) and muscarinic, γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, glycine, and aryl-hydrocarbon receptors, and ΔG(0) for all of these except K(Ca)1.1. Regarding AChRs, η is 48–56% for agonists related structurally to acetylcholine but is only ∼39% for agonists related to epibatidine; ΔG(0) is 8.4 kcal/mol in adult and 9.6 kcal/mol in fetal receptors. Efficiency plots for all of the above receptors are approximately linear, with η values between 12% and 57% and ΔG(0) values between 2 and 12 kcal/mol. Efficiency appears to be a general attribute of agonist action at receptor binding sites that is useful for understanding binding mechanisms, categorizing agonists, and estimating concentration–response relationships. Rockefeller University Press 2019-04-01 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6445574/ /pubmed/30635369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812215 Text en © 2019 Nayak et al. http://www.rupress.org/terms/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Nayak, Tapan K. Vij, Ridhima Bruhova, Iva Shandilya, Jayasha Auerbach, Anthony Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change |
title | Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change |
title_full | Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change |
title_fullStr | Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change |
title_short | Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change |
title_sort | efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445574/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30635369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nayaktapank efficiencymeasurestheconversionofagonistbindingenergyintoreceptorconformationalchange AT vijridhima efficiencymeasurestheconversionofagonistbindingenergyintoreceptorconformationalchange AT bruhovaiva efficiencymeasurestheconversionofagonistbindingenergyintoreceptorconformationalchange AT shandilyajayasha efficiencymeasurestheconversionofagonistbindingenergyintoreceptorconformationalchange AT auerbachanthony efficiencymeasurestheconversionofagonistbindingenergyintoreceptorconformationalchange |