Cargando…

Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change

Receptors alternate between resting↔active conformations that bind agonists with low↔high affinity. Here, we define a new agonist attribute, energy efficiency (η), as the fraction of ligand-binding energy converted into the mechanical work of the activation conformational change. η depends only on t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nayak, Tapan K., Vij, Ridhima, Bruhova, Iva, Shandilya, Jayasha, Auerbach, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Rockefeller University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30635369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812215
_version_ 1783408222419288064
author Nayak, Tapan K.
Vij, Ridhima
Bruhova, Iva
Shandilya, Jayasha
Auerbach, Anthony
author_facet Nayak, Tapan K.
Vij, Ridhima
Bruhova, Iva
Shandilya, Jayasha
Auerbach, Anthony
author_sort Nayak, Tapan K.
collection PubMed
description Receptors alternate between resting↔active conformations that bind agonists with low↔high affinity. Here, we define a new agonist attribute, energy efficiency (η), as the fraction of ligand-binding energy converted into the mechanical work of the activation conformational change. η depends only on the resting/active agonist-binding energy ratio. In a plot of activation energy versus binding energy (an “efficiency” plot), the slope gives η and the y intercept gives the receptor’s intrinsic activation energy (without agonists; ΔG(0)). We used single-channel electrophysiology to estimate η for eight different agonists and ΔG(0) in human endplate acetylcholine receptors (AChRs). From published equilibrium constants, we also estimated η for agonists of K(Ca)1.1 (BK channels) and muscarinic, γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, glycine, and aryl-hydrocarbon receptors, and ΔG(0) for all of these except K(Ca)1.1. Regarding AChRs, η is 48–56% for agonists related structurally to acetylcholine but is only ∼39% for agonists related to epibatidine; ΔG(0) is 8.4 kcal/mol in adult and 9.6 kcal/mol in fetal receptors. Efficiency plots for all of the above receptors are approximately linear, with η values between 12% and 57% and ΔG(0) values between 2 and 12 kcal/mol. Efficiency appears to be a general attribute of agonist action at receptor binding sites that is useful for understanding binding mechanisms, categorizing agonists, and estimating concentration–response relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6445574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Rockefeller University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64455742019-10-01 Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change Nayak, Tapan K. Vij, Ridhima Bruhova, Iva Shandilya, Jayasha Auerbach, Anthony J Gen Physiol Research Articles Receptors alternate between resting↔active conformations that bind agonists with low↔high affinity. Here, we define a new agonist attribute, energy efficiency (η), as the fraction of ligand-binding energy converted into the mechanical work of the activation conformational change. η depends only on the resting/active agonist-binding energy ratio. In a plot of activation energy versus binding energy (an “efficiency” plot), the slope gives η and the y intercept gives the receptor’s intrinsic activation energy (without agonists; ΔG(0)). We used single-channel electrophysiology to estimate η for eight different agonists and ΔG(0) in human endplate acetylcholine receptors (AChRs). From published equilibrium constants, we also estimated η for agonists of K(Ca)1.1 (BK channels) and muscarinic, γ-aminobutyric acid, glutamate, glycine, and aryl-hydrocarbon receptors, and ΔG(0) for all of these except K(Ca)1.1. Regarding AChRs, η is 48–56% for agonists related structurally to acetylcholine but is only ∼39% for agonists related to epibatidine; ΔG(0) is 8.4 kcal/mol in adult and 9.6 kcal/mol in fetal receptors. Efficiency plots for all of the above receptors are approximately linear, with η values between 12% and 57% and ΔG(0) values between 2 and 12 kcal/mol. Efficiency appears to be a general attribute of agonist action at receptor binding sites that is useful for understanding binding mechanisms, categorizing agonists, and estimating concentration–response relationships. Rockefeller University Press 2019-04-01 2019-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6445574/ /pubmed/30635369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812215 Text en © 2019 Nayak et al. http://www.rupress.org/terms/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike–No Mirror Sites license for the first six months after the publication date (see http://www.rupress.org/terms/). After six months it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 4.0 International license, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Nayak, Tapan K.
Vij, Ridhima
Bruhova, Iva
Shandilya, Jayasha
Auerbach, Anthony
Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change
title Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change
title_full Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change
title_fullStr Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change
title_short Efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change
title_sort efficiency measures the conversion of agonist binding energy into receptor conformational change
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30635369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812215
work_keys_str_mv AT nayaktapank efficiencymeasurestheconversionofagonistbindingenergyintoreceptorconformationalchange
AT vijridhima efficiencymeasurestheconversionofagonistbindingenergyintoreceptorconformationalchange
AT bruhovaiva efficiencymeasurestheconversionofagonistbindingenergyintoreceptorconformationalchange
AT shandilyajayasha efficiencymeasurestheconversionofagonistbindingenergyintoreceptorconformationalchange
AT auerbachanthony efficiencymeasurestheconversionofagonistbindingenergyintoreceptorconformationalchange