Cargando…
The binding interactions that maintain excitation–contraction coupling junctions in skeletal muscle
Calcium for contraction of skeletal muscles is released via tetrameric ryanodine receptor (RYR1) channels of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), which are assembled in ordered arrays called couplons at junctions where the SR abuts T tubules or plasmalemma. Voltage-gated Ca(2+) (Ca(V)1.1) channels, foun...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Rockefeller University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812268 |
_version_ | 1783408224724058112 |
---|---|
author | Ríos, Eduardo Gillespie, Dirk Franzini-Armstrong, Clara |
author_facet | Ríos, Eduardo Gillespie, Dirk Franzini-Armstrong, Clara |
author_sort | Ríos, Eduardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Calcium for contraction of skeletal muscles is released via tetrameric ryanodine receptor (RYR1) channels of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), which are assembled in ordered arrays called couplons at junctions where the SR abuts T tubules or plasmalemma. Voltage-gated Ca(2+) (Ca(V)1.1) channels, found in tubules or plasmalemma, form symmetric complexes called Ca(V) tetrads that associate with and activate underlying RYR tetramers during membrane depolarization by conveying a conformational change. Intriguingly, Ca(V) tetrads regularly skip every other RYR tetramer within the array; therefore, the RYRs underlying tetrads (named V), but not the voltage sensor–lacking (C) RYRs, should be activated by depolarization. Here we hypothesize that the checkerboard association is maintained solely by reversible binary interactions between Ca(V)s and RYRs and test this hypothesis using a quantitative model of the energies that govern Ca(V)1.1–RYR1 binding, which are assumed to depend on number and location of bound Ca(V)s. A Monte Carlo simulation generates large statistical samples and distributions of state variables that can be compared with quantitative features in freeze-fracture images of couplons from various sources. This analysis reveals two necessary model features: (1) the energy of a tetramer must have wells at low and high occupation by Ca(V)s, so that Ca(V)s positively cooperate in binding RYR (an allosteric effect), and (2) a large energy penalty results when two Ca(V)s bind simultaneously to adjacent RYR protomers in adjacent tetramers (a steric clash). Under the hypothesis, V and C channels will eventually reverse roles. Role reversal justifies the presence of sensor-lacking C channels, as a structural and functional reserve for control of muscle contraction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6445584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Rockefeller University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64455842019-04-08 The binding interactions that maintain excitation–contraction coupling junctions in skeletal muscle Ríos, Eduardo Gillespie, Dirk Franzini-Armstrong, Clara J Gen Physiol Research Articles Calcium for contraction of skeletal muscles is released via tetrameric ryanodine receptor (RYR1) channels of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), which are assembled in ordered arrays called couplons at junctions where the SR abuts T tubules or plasmalemma. Voltage-gated Ca(2+) (Ca(V)1.1) channels, found in tubules or plasmalemma, form symmetric complexes called Ca(V) tetrads that associate with and activate underlying RYR tetramers during membrane depolarization by conveying a conformational change. Intriguingly, Ca(V) tetrads regularly skip every other RYR tetramer within the array; therefore, the RYRs underlying tetrads (named V), but not the voltage sensor–lacking (C) RYRs, should be activated by depolarization. Here we hypothesize that the checkerboard association is maintained solely by reversible binary interactions between Ca(V)s and RYRs and test this hypothesis using a quantitative model of the energies that govern Ca(V)1.1–RYR1 binding, which are assumed to depend on number and location of bound Ca(V)s. A Monte Carlo simulation generates large statistical samples and distributions of state variables that can be compared with quantitative features in freeze-fracture images of couplons from various sources. This analysis reveals two necessary model features: (1) the energy of a tetramer must have wells at low and high occupation by Ca(V)s, so that Ca(V)s positively cooperate in binding RYR (an allosteric effect), and (2) a large energy penalty results when two Ca(V)s bind simultaneously to adjacent RYR protomers in adjacent tetramers (a steric clash). Under the hypothesis, V and C channels will eventually reverse roles. Role reversal justifies the presence of sensor-lacking C channels, as a structural and functional reserve for control of muscle contraction. Rockefeller University Press 2019-04-01 2019-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6445584/ /pubmed/30728215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812268 Text en © 2019 Ríos et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Ríos, Eduardo Gillespie, Dirk Franzini-Armstrong, Clara The binding interactions that maintain excitation–contraction coupling junctions in skeletal muscle |
title | The binding interactions that maintain excitation–contraction coupling junctions in skeletal muscle |
title_full | The binding interactions that maintain excitation–contraction coupling junctions in skeletal muscle |
title_fullStr | The binding interactions that maintain excitation–contraction coupling junctions in skeletal muscle |
title_full_unstemmed | The binding interactions that maintain excitation–contraction coupling junctions in skeletal muscle |
title_short | The binding interactions that maintain excitation–contraction coupling junctions in skeletal muscle |
title_sort | binding interactions that maintain excitation–contraction coupling junctions in skeletal muscle |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1085/jgp.201812268 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rioseduardo thebindinginteractionsthatmaintainexcitationcontractioncouplingjunctionsinskeletalmuscle AT gillespiedirk thebindinginteractionsthatmaintainexcitationcontractioncouplingjunctionsinskeletalmuscle AT franziniarmstrongclara thebindinginteractionsthatmaintainexcitationcontractioncouplingjunctionsinskeletalmuscle AT rioseduardo bindinginteractionsthatmaintainexcitationcontractioncouplingjunctionsinskeletalmuscle AT gillespiedirk bindinginteractionsthatmaintainexcitationcontractioncouplingjunctionsinskeletalmuscle AT franziniarmstrongclara bindinginteractionsthatmaintainexcitationcontractioncouplingjunctionsinskeletalmuscle |