Cargando…
Religiosity and Meditation Practice: Exploring Their Explanatory Power on Psychological Adjustment
There has been increased interest in the relationships between religiosity, meditation practice and well-being, but there is lack of understanding as to how specific religious components and distinct meditation practices could influence different positive and negative psychological adjustment outcom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00630 |
_version_ | 1783408264645443584 |
---|---|
author | Montero-Marin, Jesus Perez-Yus, Maria C. Cebolla, Ausias Soler, Joaquim Demarzo, Marcelo Garcia-Campayo, Javier |
author_facet | Montero-Marin, Jesus Perez-Yus, Maria C. Cebolla, Ausias Soler, Joaquim Demarzo, Marcelo Garcia-Campayo, Javier |
author_sort | Montero-Marin, Jesus |
collection | PubMed |
description | There has been increased interest in the relationships between religiosity, meditation practice and well-being, but there is lack of understanding as to how specific religious components and distinct meditation practices could influence different positive and negative psychological adjustment outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the explanatory power of religious beliefs and the practice of prayer, focused attention (FA), open monitoring (OM), and compassion meditation (CM) on psychological adjustment, taking into consideration a number of practice-related variables such as session length, frequency of practice and lifetime practice. Psychological adjustment was assessed by means of happiness, positive affect, depression, negative affect, and emotional overproduction. A cross-sectional design was used, with a final sample comprising 210 Spanish participants who completed an online assessment protocol. Hierarchical regressions were performed, including age, sex and psychotropic medication use in the first step as possible confounders, with the addition of religious beliefs and the practice of prayer, FA, OM, and CM in the second step. FA session length was related to all psychological adjustment outcomes: happiness (ΔR(2) = 0.09, p = 0.002; β = 0.25, p = 0.001), positive affect (ΔR(2) = 0.09, p = 0.002; β = 0.18, p = 0.014), depression (ΔR(2) = 0.07, p = 0.004; β = -0.27, p < 0.001), negative affect (ΔR(2) = 0.08, p = 0.007; β = -0.27, p < 0.001) and emotional overproduction (ΔR(2) = 0.07, p = 0.013; β = -0.23, p = 0.001). CM session length was related to positive affect (β = 0.18, p = 0.011). CM practice frequency was associated with happiness (ΔR(2) = 0.06, p = 0.038; β = 0.16, p = 0.041). Lifetime practice of FA was related to happiness (ΔR(2) = 0.08, p = 0.007; β = 0.21, p = 0.030) and OM to emotional overproduction (ΔR(2) = 0.08, p = 0.037; β = -0.19, p = 0.047). Religious beliefs and prayer seemed to be less relevant than meditation practices such as FA, OM, and CM in explaining psychological adjustment. The distinct meditation practices might be differentially related to distinct psychological adjustment outcomes through different practice-related variables. However, research into other forms of institutional religiosity integrating social aspects of religion is required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6445895 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64458952019-04-10 Religiosity and Meditation Practice: Exploring Their Explanatory Power on Psychological Adjustment Montero-Marin, Jesus Perez-Yus, Maria C. Cebolla, Ausias Soler, Joaquim Demarzo, Marcelo Garcia-Campayo, Javier Front Psychol Psychology There has been increased interest in the relationships between religiosity, meditation practice and well-being, but there is lack of understanding as to how specific religious components and distinct meditation practices could influence different positive and negative psychological adjustment outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the explanatory power of religious beliefs and the practice of prayer, focused attention (FA), open monitoring (OM), and compassion meditation (CM) on psychological adjustment, taking into consideration a number of practice-related variables such as session length, frequency of practice and lifetime practice. Psychological adjustment was assessed by means of happiness, positive affect, depression, negative affect, and emotional overproduction. A cross-sectional design was used, with a final sample comprising 210 Spanish participants who completed an online assessment protocol. Hierarchical regressions were performed, including age, sex and psychotropic medication use in the first step as possible confounders, with the addition of religious beliefs and the practice of prayer, FA, OM, and CM in the second step. FA session length was related to all psychological adjustment outcomes: happiness (ΔR(2) = 0.09, p = 0.002; β = 0.25, p = 0.001), positive affect (ΔR(2) = 0.09, p = 0.002; β = 0.18, p = 0.014), depression (ΔR(2) = 0.07, p = 0.004; β = -0.27, p < 0.001), negative affect (ΔR(2) = 0.08, p = 0.007; β = -0.27, p < 0.001) and emotional overproduction (ΔR(2) = 0.07, p = 0.013; β = -0.23, p = 0.001). CM session length was related to positive affect (β = 0.18, p = 0.011). CM practice frequency was associated with happiness (ΔR(2) = 0.06, p = 0.038; β = 0.16, p = 0.041). Lifetime practice of FA was related to happiness (ΔR(2) = 0.08, p = 0.007; β = 0.21, p = 0.030) and OM to emotional overproduction (ΔR(2) = 0.08, p = 0.037; β = -0.19, p = 0.047). Religious beliefs and prayer seemed to be less relevant than meditation practices such as FA, OM, and CM in explaining psychological adjustment. The distinct meditation practices might be differentially related to distinct psychological adjustment outcomes through different practice-related variables. However, research into other forms of institutional religiosity integrating social aspects of religion is required. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6445895/ /pubmed/30971982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00630 Text en Copyright © 2019 Montero-Marin, Perez-Yus, Cebolla, Soler, Demarzo and Garcia-Campayo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Montero-Marin, Jesus Perez-Yus, Maria C. Cebolla, Ausias Soler, Joaquim Demarzo, Marcelo Garcia-Campayo, Javier Religiosity and Meditation Practice: Exploring Their Explanatory Power on Psychological Adjustment |
title | Religiosity and Meditation Practice: Exploring Their Explanatory Power on Psychological Adjustment |
title_full | Religiosity and Meditation Practice: Exploring Their Explanatory Power on Psychological Adjustment |
title_fullStr | Religiosity and Meditation Practice: Exploring Their Explanatory Power on Psychological Adjustment |
title_full_unstemmed | Religiosity and Meditation Practice: Exploring Their Explanatory Power on Psychological Adjustment |
title_short | Religiosity and Meditation Practice: Exploring Their Explanatory Power on Psychological Adjustment |
title_sort | religiosity and meditation practice: exploring their explanatory power on psychological adjustment |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6445895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30971982 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00630 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monteromarinjesus religiosityandmeditationpracticeexploringtheirexplanatorypoweronpsychologicaladjustment AT perezyusmariac religiosityandmeditationpracticeexploringtheirexplanatorypoweronpsychologicaladjustment AT cebollaausias religiosityandmeditationpracticeexploringtheirexplanatorypoweronpsychologicaladjustment AT solerjoaquim religiosityandmeditationpracticeexploringtheirexplanatorypoweronpsychologicaladjustment AT demarzomarcelo religiosityandmeditationpracticeexploringtheirexplanatorypoweronpsychologicaladjustment AT garciacampayojavier religiosityandmeditationpracticeexploringtheirexplanatorypoweronpsychologicaladjustment |