Cargando…

Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study

OBJECTIVES: The Attune total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been used in over 600 000 patients worldwide. Registry data show good clinical outcome; however, concerns over the cement-tibial interface have been reported. We used retrieval analysis to give further insight into this controversial topic. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cerquiglini, A., Henckel, J., Hothi, H., Allen, P., Lewis, J., Eskelinen, A., Skinner, J., Hirschmann, M. T., Hart, A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6446526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30997039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJJ-2018-0102.R2
_version_ 1783408380500508672
author Cerquiglini, A.
Henckel, J.
Hothi, H.
Allen, P.
Lewis, J.
Eskelinen, A.
Skinner, J.
Hirschmann, M. T.
Hart, A. J.
author_facet Cerquiglini, A.
Henckel, J.
Hothi, H.
Allen, P.
Lewis, J.
Eskelinen, A.
Skinner, J.
Hirschmann, M. T.
Hart, A. J.
author_sort Cerquiglini, A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Attune total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been used in over 600 000 patients worldwide. Registry data show good clinical outcome; however, concerns over the cement-tibial interface have been reported. We used retrieval analysis to give further insight into this controversial topic. METHODS: We examined 12 titanium (Ti) PFC Sigma implants, eight cobalt-chromium (CoCr) PFC Sigma implants, eight cobalt-chromium PFC Sigma rotating platform (RP) implants, and 11 Attune implants. We used a peer-reviewed digital imaging method to quantify the amount of cement attached to the backside of each tibial tray. We then measured: 1) the size of tibial tray thickness, tray projections, peripheral lips, and undercuts; and 2) surface roughness (Ra) on the backside and keel of the trays. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate differences between the two designs. RESULTS: There was no evidence of cement attachment on any of the 11 Attune trays examined. There were significant differences between Ti and CoCr PFC Sigma implants and Attune designs (p < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference between CoCr PFC Sigma RP and Attune designs (p > 0.05). There were significant differences in the design features between the investigated designs (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The majority of the earliest PFC Sigma designs showed evidence of cement, while all of the retrieved Attune trays and the majority of the RP PFC trays in this study had no cement attached. This may be attributable to the design differences of these implants, in particular in relation to the cement pockets. Our results may help explain a controversial aspect related to cement attachment in a recently introduced TKA design. Cite this article: A. Cerquiglini, J. Henckel, H. Hothi, P. Allen, J. Lewis, A. Eskelinen, J. Skinner, M. T. Hirschmann, A. J. Hart. Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:136–145. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJJ-2018-0102.R2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6446526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64465262019-04-17 Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study Cerquiglini, A. Henckel, J. Hothi, H. Allen, P. Lewis, J. Eskelinen, A. Skinner, J. Hirschmann, M. T. Hart, A. J. Bone Joint Res Research OBJECTIVES: The Attune total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been used in over 600 000 patients worldwide. Registry data show good clinical outcome; however, concerns over the cement-tibial interface have been reported. We used retrieval analysis to give further insight into this controversial topic. METHODS: We examined 12 titanium (Ti) PFC Sigma implants, eight cobalt-chromium (CoCr) PFC Sigma implants, eight cobalt-chromium PFC Sigma rotating platform (RP) implants, and 11 Attune implants. We used a peer-reviewed digital imaging method to quantify the amount of cement attached to the backside of each tibial tray. We then measured: 1) the size of tibial tray thickness, tray projections, peripheral lips, and undercuts; and 2) surface roughness (Ra) on the backside and keel of the trays. Statistical analyses were performed to investigate differences between the two designs. RESULTS: There was no evidence of cement attachment on any of the 11 Attune trays examined. There were significant differences between Ti and CoCr PFC Sigma implants and Attune designs (p < 0.05); however, there was no significant difference between CoCr PFC Sigma RP and Attune designs (p > 0.05). There were significant differences in the design features between the investigated designs (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The majority of the earliest PFC Sigma designs showed evidence of cement, while all of the retrieved Attune trays and the majority of the RP PFC trays in this study had no cement attached. This may be attributable to the design differences of these implants, in particular in relation to the cement pockets. Our results may help explain a controversial aspect related to cement attachment in a recently introduced TKA design. Cite this article: A. Cerquiglini, J. Henckel, H. Hothi, P. Allen, J. Lewis, A. Eskelinen, J. Skinner, M. T. Hirschmann, A. J. Hart. Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:136–145. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJJ-2018-0102.R2. 2019-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6446526/ /pubmed/30997039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJJ-2018-0102.R2 Text en © 2019 Author(s) et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research
Cerquiglini, A.
Henckel, J.
Hothi, H.
Allen, P.
Lewis, J.
Eskelinen, A.
Skinner, J.
Hirschmann, M. T.
Hart, A. J.
Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study
title Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study
title_full Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study
title_fullStr Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study
title_short Analysis of the Attune tibial tray backside: A comparative retrieval study
title_sort analysis of the attune tibial tray backside: a comparative retrieval study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6446526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30997039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.83.BJJ-2018-0102.R2
work_keys_str_mv AT cerquiglinia analysisoftheattunetibialtraybacksideacomparativeretrievalstudy
AT henckelj analysisoftheattunetibialtraybacksideacomparativeretrievalstudy
AT hothih analysisoftheattunetibialtraybacksideacomparativeretrievalstudy
AT allenp analysisoftheattunetibialtraybacksideacomparativeretrievalstudy
AT lewisj analysisoftheattunetibialtraybacksideacomparativeretrievalstudy
AT eskelinena analysisoftheattunetibialtraybacksideacomparativeretrievalstudy
AT skinnerj analysisoftheattunetibialtraybacksideacomparativeretrievalstudy
AT hirschmannmt analysisoftheattunetibialtraybacksideacomparativeretrievalstudy
AT hartaj analysisoftheattunetibialtraybacksideacomparativeretrievalstudy