Cargando…
Comparing of Tp-Te Interval and Tp-Te/Qt Ratio in Patients with Preserved, Mid-Range and Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is classified in three class: HF with preserved EF (HFpEF); normal or LVEF ≥ 50%, HF with reduced EF (HFrEF); LEVF < 40% and newly HF mid-range EF (HFmrEF); LVEF 40-49%. On Electrocardiography (ECG) T wave, Tpeak-Tend (Tp-Te) interval reflects transmural dispersion...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Republic of Macedonia
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.186 |
_version_ | 1783408484842209280 |
---|---|
author | Son, Osman Boduroglu, Yalcin |
author_facet | Son, Osman Boduroglu, Yalcin |
author_sort | Son, Osman |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is classified in three class: HF with preserved EF (HFpEF); normal or LVEF ≥ 50%, HF with reduced EF (HFrEF); LEVF < 40% and newly HF mid-range EF (HFmrEF); LVEF 40-49%. On Electrocardiography (ECG) T wave, Tpeak-Tend (Tp-Te) interval reflects transmural dispersion of repolarisation (TDR) which of these indexes have been proposed as predictors of risk for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in many cardiac diseases. AIM: Aim of this study to asses these indices of TDR among three HF class. METHODS: Total of 192 patients were included in this study. RESULTS: Many of indices like Tp-Te, Tp-Te/QT wasn’t different between groups (P > 0.05). But mean Q-Tpeak (QTp), S-Tend (S-Te) and S-Tpeak (S-Tp) were found significantly different between groups (P < 0.05). Again S-Te was found different according to having fragmented QRS (fQRS) on ECG (P = 0.031). Comparing to mitral inflow E/A parameters showed significant differences for Tp-Te, Tp-Tec, Tp-Te/QT, Tp-Te/QTc and Tp-Tec/QTc parameters. Finally, we found correlations between S-Te and white blood cell (WBC) (r = - 0.171; P = 0.037) and S-Tp and WBC (r = - 0.170; P = 0.038) and between S-Te and fQRS (r = 0.158; P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: We didn’t find differences for many of indices of TDR like Tp-Te interval between groups except QTp, S-Te, S-Tp intervals. Also, S-Te and fQRS showed significant correlation. For prediction of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiovascular death newer indexes on ECG are needed to be established in the future which will make us facilitate to distinguish high risk patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6447328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Republic of Macedonia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64473282019-04-08 Comparing of Tp-Te Interval and Tp-Te/Qt Ratio in Patients with Preserved, Mid-Range and Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure Son, Osman Boduroglu, Yalcin Open Access Maced J Med Sci Clinical Science BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is classified in three class: HF with preserved EF (HFpEF); normal or LVEF ≥ 50%, HF with reduced EF (HFrEF); LEVF < 40% and newly HF mid-range EF (HFmrEF); LVEF 40-49%. On Electrocardiography (ECG) T wave, Tpeak-Tend (Tp-Te) interval reflects transmural dispersion of repolarisation (TDR) which of these indexes have been proposed as predictors of risk for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in many cardiac diseases. AIM: Aim of this study to asses these indices of TDR among three HF class. METHODS: Total of 192 patients were included in this study. RESULTS: Many of indices like Tp-Te, Tp-Te/QT wasn’t different between groups (P > 0.05). But mean Q-Tpeak (QTp), S-Tend (S-Te) and S-Tpeak (S-Tp) were found significantly different between groups (P < 0.05). Again S-Te was found different according to having fragmented QRS (fQRS) on ECG (P = 0.031). Comparing to mitral inflow E/A parameters showed significant differences for Tp-Te, Tp-Tec, Tp-Te/QT, Tp-Te/QTc and Tp-Tec/QTc parameters. Finally, we found correlations between S-Te and white blood cell (WBC) (r = - 0.171; P = 0.037) and S-Tp and WBC (r = - 0.170; P = 0.038) and between S-Te and fQRS (r = 0.158; P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: We didn’t find differences for many of indices of TDR like Tp-Te interval between groups except QTp, S-Te, S-Tp intervals. Also, S-Te and fQRS showed significant correlation. For prediction of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiovascular death newer indexes on ECG are needed to be established in the future which will make us facilitate to distinguish high risk patients. Republic of Macedonia 2019-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6447328/ /pubmed/30962833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.186 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Osman Son, Yalcin Boduroglu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Science Son, Osman Boduroglu, Yalcin Comparing of Tp-Te Interval and Tp-Te/Qt Ratio in Patients with Preserved, Mid-Range and Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure |
title | Comparing of Tp-Te Interval and Tp-Te/Qt Ratio in Patients with Preserved, Mid-Range and Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure |
title_full | Comparing of Tp-Te Interval and Tp-Te/Qt Ratio in Patients with Preserved, Mid-Range and Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure |
title_fullStr | Comparing of Tp-Te Interval and Tp-Te/Qt Ratio in Patients with Preserved, Mid-Range and Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing of Tp-Te Interval and Tp-Te/Qt Ratio in Patients with Preserved, Mid-Range and Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure |
title_short | Comparing of Tp-Te Interval and Tp-Te/Qt Ratio in Patients with Preserved, Mid-Range and Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure |
title_sort | comparing of tp-te interval and tp-te/qt ratio in patients with preserved, mid-range and reduced ejection fraction heart failure |
topic | Clinical Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.186 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sonosman comparingoftpteintervalandtpteqtratioinpatientswithpreservedmidrangeandreducedejectionfractionheartfailure AT bodurogluyalcin comparingoftpteintervalandtpteqtratioinpatientswithpreservedmidrangeandreducedejectionfractionheartfailure |