Cargando…

Influence Maximization for Fixed Heterogeneous Thresholds

Influence Maximization is a NP-hard problem of selecting the optimal set of influencers in a network. Here, we propose two new approaches to influence maximization based on two very different metrics. The first metric, termed Balanced Index (BI), is fast to compute and assigns top values to two kind...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karampourniotis, P. D., Szymanski, B. K., Korniss, G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41822-w
_version_ 1783408524112429056
author Karampourniotis, P. D.
Szymanski, B. K.
Korniss, G.
author_facet Karampourniotis, P. D.
Szymanski, B. K.
Korniss, G.
author_sort Karampourniotis, P. D.
collection PubMed
description Influence Maximization is a NP-hard problem of selecting the optimal set of influencers in a network. Here, we propose two new approaches to influence maximization based on two very different metrics. The first metric, termed Balanced Index (BI), is fast to compute and assigns top values to two kinds of nodes: those with high resistance to adoption, and those with large out-degree. This is done by linearly combining three properties of a node: its degree, susceptibility to new opinions, and the impact its activation will have on its neighborhood. Controlling the weights between those three terms has a huge impact on performance. The second metric, termed Group Performance Index (GPI), measures performance of each node as an initiator when it is a part of randomly selected initiator set. In each such selection, the score assigned to each teammate is inversely proportional to the number of initiators causing the desired spread. These two metrics are applicable to various cascade models; here we test them on the Linear Threshold Model with fixed and known thresholds. Furthermore, we study the impact of network degree assortativity and threshold distribution on the cascade size for metrics including ours. The results demonstrate our two metrics deliver strong performance for influence maximization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6447584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64475842019-04-10 Influence Maximization for Fixed Heterogeneous Thresholds Karampourniotis, P. D. Szymanski, B. K. Korniss, G. Sci Rep Article Influence Maximization is a NP-hard problem of selecting the optimal set of influencers in a network. Here, we propose two new approaches to influence maximization based on two very different metrics. The first metric, termed Balanced Index (BI), is fast to compute and assigns top values to two kinds of nodes: those with high resistance to adoption, and those with large out-degree. This is done by linearly combining three properties of a node: its degree, susceptibility to new opinions, and the impact its activation will have on its neighborhood. Controlling the weights between those three terms has a huge impact on performance. The second metric, termed Group Performance Index (GPI), measures performance of each node as an initiator when it is a part of randomly selected initiator set. In each such selection, the score assigned to each teammate is inversely proportional to the number of initiators causing the desired spread. These two metrics are applicable to various cascade models; here we test them on the Linear Threshold Model with fixed and known thresholds. Furthermore, we study the impact of network degree assortativity and threshold distribution on the cascade size for metrics including ours. The results demonstrate our two metrics deliver strong performance for influence maximization. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6447584/ /pubmed/30944359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41822-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Karampourniotis, P. D.
Szymanski, B. K.
Korniss, G.
Influence Maximization for Fixed Heterogeneous Thresholds
title Influence Maximization for Fixed Heterogeneous Thresholds
title_full Influence Maximization for Fixed Heterogeneous Thresholds
title_fullStr Influence Maximization for Fixed Heterogeneous Thresholds
title_full_unstemmed Influence Maximization for Fixed Heterogeneous Thresholds
title_short Influence Maximization for Fixed Heterogeneous Thresholds
title_sort influence maximization for fixed heterogeneous thresholds
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6447584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41822-w
work_keys_str_mv AT karampourniotispd influencemaximizationforfixedheterogeneousthresholds
AT szymanskibk influencemaximizationforfixedheterogeneousthresholds
AT kornissg influencemaximizationforfixedheterogeneousthresholds